GLP-1 Drugs and Youth: Why More Research Is Needed Before Expanding Use

In just a few years, medications like Ozempic and Wegovy have gone from niche diabetes treatments to global sensations. On social media alone, the hashtag #Ozempic skyrocketed from 2 million views in 2021 to over 1.2 billion by 2023, fueling massive demand and positioning GLP-1 drugs among the fastest-growing prescriptions of the century.

While originally intended for people with type 2 diabetes, these medications are now being hailed as revolutionary tools for weight loss. Their success has inspired both clinical innovation and public fascination, but it’s also raising difficult questions, especially as their use spreads to younger populations.

What are GLP-1 drugs?

GLP-1 drugs mimic natural gut hormones called glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, which help regulate blood sugar and appetite. Older versions, such as exenatide and dulaglutide, have existed for decades, but newer formulations like semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) are far more potent. They’re now considered a central part of modern obesity and diabetes care.

However, the rise of GLP-1 prescriptions isn’t limited to adults. In the United States, use among children and teens has surged nearly 600% in the past five years, driven by rising obesity rates and FDA approval for adolescents 12 and older. Yet despite this rapid growth, international data remain sparse, and pediatric guidelines lag far behind adult research.

How GLP-1s fit into pediatric weight management

According to the Global Obesity Observatory, the U.S. ranks among the top 10 countries for obesity rates. Traditionally, treatment for childhood obesity has focused on nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral change. But that approach is evolving.

In 2023, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) updated its clinical guidelines, recommending that pediatricians consider weight loss medications for patients aged 12 and older with obesity (defined as a body mass index (BMI) in the 95th percentile or above). The AAP also suggests bariatric surgery for teens 13 and up who face severe obesity and related health complications.

Still, the AAP stresses that medication should not be the first step. Lifestyle and behavioral interventions — especially those involving family participation — remain the foundation of care. These programs focus on building sustainable habits around eating, exercise and emotional well-being, often requiring consistent, long-term engagement.

GLP-1 use around the world

While the United States has embraced GLP-1 medications more rapidly than most nations, the global picture looks very different. In the U.K., GLP-1s are only approved for people with a BMI over 30, and patients must reapply for treatment every two years. In the Netherlands, approval starts at a BMI over 35. In the U.S., insurance often covers the medication for just one year, even though it’s meant for long-term use.

Some countries, such as India and Canada, have begun crafting pediatric guidelines. The Indian Academy of Pediatrics permits GLP-1 use for adolescents 12 and older with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40) or life-threatening complications. Similarly, the Canadian Medical Association Journal recommends combining GLP-1 therapy with behavioral and psychological interventions.

Yet, despite these developments, international research on pediatric use remains limited. Most studies focus on adults, leaving many unanswered questions about long-term safety, effectiveness, and psychological impact for children and teens.

Balancing benefits and concerns

GLP-1 drugs offer a promising new tool in the fight against childhood obesity, but they also introduce complex challenges. For one, starting these medications at a young age could mean lifelong use, with uncertain implications for physical and emotional development. Adolescents may not fully grasp the commitment or side effects that come with chronic medication use.

There’s also the question of mental health and body image. Adolescence is a sensitive time, and focusing heavily on weight can affect self-esteem, peer relationships, and social participation. For many families, the goal isn’t just weight loss — it’s helping children build confidence and lifelong healthy habits.

Finally, researchers simply don’t know enough about how GLP-1s affect children over the long term. Clinical trials in adults show promising results, but pediatric data trails far behind. Without clearer evidence, experts caution against over-reliance on these drugs before understanding their full impact. Until science catches up, one thing remains clear: when it comes to kids and GLP-1s, careful consideration is just as vital as clinical innovation.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “How Ozempic and GLP-1s Are Changing Childhood and Teen Weight Management,” Think Global Health, 10/31/25
Source: “The Ozempic Era,” Medical University of South Carolina, 8/29/24
Image by Markus Winkler/Pexels

Diabetes Still Rising Despite Weight-Loss Drug Boom

New data shows a surprising shift in America’s health landscape: fewer adults are obese today compared with just a few years ago. According to a new Gallup National Health and Well-Being Index survey released on October 28, 2025, an estimated 7.6 million fewer adults now meet the clinical definition of obesity than in 2022.

GLP-1 drugs may be part of the reason

The national adult obesity rate — defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher — has dropped from 39.9% in 2022 to 37% in 2025, Gallup found. It’s a modest but meaningful decline after decades of steady increases.

Experts suggest that a major contributor could be the growing use of GLP-1 injectable drugs, such as Ozempic and Wegovy. These medications, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for weight loss in 2021, help regulate appetite and make people feel fuller longer — resulting in significant weight reduction for many users.

A rapid surge in weight-loss drug use

In just the past year, GLP-1 use among adults more than doubled, according to Gallup. About 12.4% of respondents now say they use these drugs, compared with 5.8% in early 2024, when the survey first began tracking them.

The popularity of these injectables has soared so much that nine in 10 Americans are now aware of them, according to separate research from the Pew Research Center. Over half of U.S. adults believe that using GLP-1s for weight loss is a good idea.

At the same time, Medicaid coverage for these drugs has expanded: 13 states now fully cover GLP-1s for obesity treatment. However, major disparities remain — access to the drugs still varies widely across income levels, racial groups, and regions, as some research indicates. Some people even attempt to make GLP-1 compounds at home to cut costs, raising safety concerns. Yes, really. It’s called “gray GLP-1s,” or just “gray.” And we’ll look at it soon.

Experts say that a stronger insurance and pricing framework could make GLP-1 treatments more accessible and sustainable in the long run, potentially cementing them as a cornerstone of America’s obesity strategy.

Diabetes hits a record high

Even as obesity rates fall, the picture isn’t entirely bright. The same Gallup survey found that diabetes diagnoses have reached an all-time high of 13.8% among U.S. adults.

Among those with diabetes, 14.1% said they use GLP-1 drugs — a slightly higher rate than among the general adult population. While the medications can improve blood sugar control and aid weight management, they aren’t a cure. Experts caution that genetics, environment, and lifestyle choices still play major roles in both obesity and diabetes risk. GLP-1s are one tool among many — not a silver bullet.

Health beyond the injection

The findings highlight an important truth: While medical advances can make weight loss easier, lasting health improvements still depend on holistic habits. Balanced nutrition, regular physical activity, and preventive healthcare remain essential.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “The obesity rate in the US has declined. Are GLP-1s responsible?,” USA TODAY, 10/28/25
Source: “Uptake of and Disparities in Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Prescribing for Obesity in the US,” JAMA Network, 4/29/25
Image by Moe Magners/Pexels

How AI Could Help Kids Develop Healthier Eating Habits by Tracking Bite Rate

On this blog, we’ve been looking for a while at how digital technology can help reduce obesity and improve pediatric care. Perhaps unsurprisingly, AI is one of the tech tools playing in the field.

In a collaborative project between Penn State’s Departments of Nutritional Sciences and Human Development and Family Studies, researchers developed ByteTrack, an AI model designed to detect how often a child takes a bite during a meal. The pilot study, published in Frontiers in Nutrition, marks a promising step forward in using technology to support children’s health. Let’s take a quick look.

The link between eating speed and childhood obesity

How quickly a child eats might be more important than parents realize. According to researchers, children who take faster bites during meals are at greater risk of developing obesity. The speed at which a child eats — especially when paired with larger bite sizes — has been shown to lead to higher calorie intake and weight gain over time.

Alaina Pearce, Ph.D., research data management librarian at Penn State and co-author of the study, said:

Bite rate is often the target behavior for interventions aimed at slowing eating rate… It’s a stable characteristic of children’s eating style that can be modified to reduce intake and ultimately lower obesity risk.

Why studying bite rate has been so difficult

While the link between bite rate and obesity is well-established, studying it has been a major challenge. Traditionally, researchers had to watch hours of video footage and manually count each bite, which was a time-consuming and expensive process. This limitation meant most studies were small and conducted in tightly controlled lab settings.

To expand research beyond the lab, Penn State scientists set out to find a more efficient way to measure bite rate, and turned to artificial intelligence for help.

ByteTrack: an AI-powered tool for measuring bite rate

Lead author and doctoral candidate Yashaswini Bhat partnered with Dr. Timothy Brick, associate professor of human development and family studies, to design a system capable of identifying children’s faces in videos, even when multiple people were present, and detecting each bite.

Using over 1,400 minutes of video from Penn State’s Food and Brain Study, which included 94 children aged 7 to 9, the researchers trained and tested the AI to recognize when a child took a bite. They then compared the AI’s results with those of human observers.

Promising results, but room to grow in smart eating tech

The system performed remarkably well in identifying children’s faces, achieving 97% accuracy compared to human evaluators. When it came to detecting bites, it reached about 70% of human accuracy, a strong start for such a complex task.

The AI struggled most when children’s faces were partially blocked or when they played with their food. Bhat said:

Chewing on a spoon or playing with food can look like a bite to the AI… These situations made it harder for the system to tell the difference.

Despite these challenges, the research team views ByteTrack as a successful proof of concept. With more data and refinement, the system could soon learn to better distinguish between bites, sips, and other actions.

Bhat said:

Our ultimate goal is to create a robust tool that can work in real-world environments… One day, we might have a smartphone app that gently alerts children when they’re eating too fast — helping them form healthier habits that last a lifetime.

Mobile apps are not a stranger to healthcare

As we’ve covered before:

Studies have shown their effectiveness in promoting weight loss and healthy behaviors, both as standalone tools and in combination with traditional treatments. The apps the authors mention include MetaWell, OBEST, and MINISTOP 2.0. Let’s not forget Dr. Pretlow-designed W8 Loss 2 Go and BrainWeighve either.

The ability to rechannel displacement into less harmless activities rather than succumbing to urges is behind the behavior modification app, BrainWeighve, currently ramping up for a trial through the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). The trial focuses on weight loss for obese teens using a self-directed, physician-supervised program withdrawing from one problem food at a time.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “New AI tool detects bite rate to help prevent childhood obesity,” News-Medical.net, 10/16/25
Source: “AI Counts Kids’ Bites In Fight Against Obesity,” U.S. News & World Report, 10/20/25
Image by RDNE Stock project/Pexels

Managing Obesity With Long-Term Care

The European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) has introduced a new clinical management algorithm that reinforces a key message echoed across the medical community: obesity is a chronic, relapsing disease requiring long-term, sustained care.

Moving away from short-term, weight-focused approaches, the new EASO guidelines present a comprehensive, evidence-based framework centered on personalized, multi-faceted treatment strategies. The algorithm marks a major step forward in how obesity should be addressed across clinical settings — not as a temporary condition, but as a complex disease that demands continuous management, just like diabetes or hypertension.

A comprehensive, individualized approach

At the foundation of EASO’s new model lies a triad of core lifestyle interventions: nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral therapy. While these remain essential, the guidelines acknowledge that lifestyle changes alone are often insufficient for achieving and sustaining meaningful weight loss in many patients.

To close this gap, the algorithm integrates obesity management medications (OMMs) and, where clinically appropriate, metabolic bariatric surgery. The framework encourages healthcare providers to tailor interventions based on each patient’s specific health profile, comorbidities, and response to treatment.

Evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations

The EASO algorithm reviews a spectrum of approved OMMs, including orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide. Among these, The GLP-1 receptor agonists semaglutide and tirzepatide are identified as preferred first-line options when substantial weight reduction is required.

Key clinical highlights

Semaglutide is highlighted as a cornerstone therapy for a broad range of patients. It produces over 10% total body weight loss on average and offers proven benefits, including a reduction in all-cause mortality and Type 2 diabetes remission.

Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, is recommended for patients with liver disease or obstructive sleep apnea, and as a co-first-line option for certain metabolic conditions.

Here are some condition-specific recommendations highlighted in Healthcare Radius:

Cardiovascular disease: Semaglutide was the only recommended OMM due to its proven ability to reduce Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).

Heart failure: Both semaglutide and tirzepatide should be considered as first-line treatments.

Knee osteoarthritis: Semaglutide should be considered as the first-line treatment as it reduces pain associated with this condition.

Type 2 diabetes or prediabetes: Semaglutide and tirzepatide are first-choice medications, and liraglutide and naltrexone–bupropion are second-line treatments.

Perhaps the most significant takeaway from the EASO update is its emphasis on continuity of care. Clinical data show that discontinuing pharmacotherapy often results in weight regain, reinforcing the need for ongoing management.

This represents a crucial shift in mindset: Obesity treatment should mirror the long-term care models used for other chronic diseases, combining sustained pharmacologic therapy with lifestyle and behavioral support to improve health outcomes and quality of life.

New evidence: GLP-1 receptor agonists effective for pediatric obesity

While much of the EASO algorithm focuses on adults, emerging research highlights the growing importance of early intervention. A recent meta-analysis published in Pediatric Research by Romariz et al. found that GLP-1 receptor agonists — a class that includes liraglutide and semaglutide — are also effective in managing obesity in children.

Study findings

The meta-analysis included 11 randomized controlled trials with 1,024 participants aged 6-19. Results showed that GLP-1 agonists significantly reduced body weight, BMI, and waist circumference. Importantly, the study demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in BMI even among children under 12 years old, a critical finding given the limited treatment options for younger patients.

Implications for pediatric care

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently recommended authorizing liraglutide for weight loss in children under 12, following a year-long trial in 82 participants showing significant BMI reductions.

The Romariz et al. study provides additional support for this move, confirming that GLP-1 receptor agonists are effective regardless of diabetes status or specific drug used. Early pharmacologic intervention may help improve long-term health outcomes and reduce future cardiovascular risk by addressing obesity before it progresses into adulthood.

A step toward population health improvement

By identifying effective pharmacologic tools for managing obesity across all age groups, these developments have the potential to transform public health. Treating obesity early, especially in children, can dramatically lower the lifetime burden of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other obesity-related conditions, ultimately reducing healthcare costs and improving overall quality of life.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “EASO releases new obesity care model focused on long-term results,” Healthcare Radius, 10/13/25
Source: “Semaglutide, Tirzepatide Named First-Line Drugs for Obesity,” Medscape, 10/9/25
Source: “Weighing up the options: childhood intervention to tackle obesity,” Nature.com, 10/9/25
Image by Pavel Danilyuk/Pexels

Pediatric Obesity Management: Insights From the AAP 2025 Conference

Managing pediatric obesity requires more than just prescribing medication. Experts at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2025 National Conference and Exhibition emphasized that successful treatment demands a whole-child approach, such as addressing not only physical health, but also psychological and social factors that shape a child’s well-being.

Key takeaways

  • A whole-child approach is essential, considering physical, psychological and social health.
  • Medication choice depends on patient preference, comorbidities, contraindications, and insurance coverage.
  • Open communication, stigma awareness, and family engagement are critical for long-term treatment success.

Establishing criteria for pharmacologic therapy

According to Ihuoma Eneli, MD, MS, professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado,

Obesity is defined by a body mass index above the 95th percentile. We always treat obesity as part of a whole-child approach.

This means evaluating not only a child’s physical condition, but also their mental health, environment, and social drivers of health. Shared decision-making between clinicians, patients and families helps determine whether to introduce pharmacologic therapy.

Jaime Moore, M.D., a physician researcher at Children’s Hospital Colorado, added that lifestyle interventions and patient interest should always be considered before moving to medications.

Choosing between medications

Several medications are available, but the best choice depends on the individual child. Dr. Moore highlighted commonly used options: Phentermine, topiramate, liraglutide, semaglutide, and metformin (off-label but frequently used).

Factors that guide selection include:

  • Patient preference: oral vs. injectable, daily vs. weekly dosing
  • Contraindications, such as a kidney stone history or mental health considerations
  • Comorbidities: Children with prediabetes or fatty liver disease may benefit more from GLP-1 receptor agonists due to their effects on hemoglobin A1c and liver enzymes

Addressing barriers to access

Access to medications remains one of the biggest challenges in pediatric obesity care. Dr. Moore emphasized:

We want to use the medications that are easy to access and are inexpensive.

Phentermine, topiramate and metformin are more likely to be covered by Medicaid and commercial insurance. Clinicians can also advocate for policy changes so that insurance coverage keeps pace with evidence-based treatment.

Engaging families and addressing stigma

Treatment conversations with families must be sensitive and inclusive. Dr. Eneli explained that families typically fall into two groups: Those actively asking about medication, and those unfamiliar or hesitant about medication. For both groups, the clinician’s role is to listen, reflect, and present all treatment options, including behavioral strategies, pharmacotherapy, and even bariatric surgery where appropriate.

Stigma also plays a major role in care. Dr. Moore shared the advice of one patient:

When you walk into the room, don’t let my weight be the first thing that you see.

This reminder underscores the importance of reducing bias and treating each child as more than their weight.

Both physicians agreed that more research is needed to understand the long-term safety and effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy for pediatric obesity. But one thing is clear: Effective treatment requires partnership with families, awareness of social context, and a compassionate, stigma-free approach.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Ihuoma Eneli, MD; and Jaime Moore, MD, discuss pediatric obesity management,” Contemporary Pediatrics, 10/2/25
Source: “What’s New in Obesity Management,” presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics 2025 National Conference & Exhibition, 9/26 – 9/30/25
Image by Luis Quintero/Pexels

Childhood Obesity in Europe: Could GLP-1 Drugs Play a Role?

As we’ve been saying over and over, across many different subjects on this blog and stretching for years, childhood obesity is rising at an alarming rate (sadly, not exactly news anymore). And not only in the U.S. It’s also happening across Europe and Central Asia. The World Obesity Federation predicts that between 2020 and 2035, obesity among boys will climb by 61%, while rates among girls are expected to soar by 75%.

Faced with this surge, health experts are asking a difficult question: What is the best way to treat this chronic disease in children? Could GLP-1 medications play a role?

Again, on this blog, we’ve been covering them in terms of research and policymaking, whether they are safe for children to use (and if yes, from what age?), whether there are any promising, successfully used alternatives, and how those aren’t enough but must come as part of the package, combined with lifestyle changes and families working together.

All that said, our content is almost exclusively focused on the U.S. But what’s the approach to rising obesity rates in other parts of the globe, in Europe in particular?

Turns out, it’s pretty much on the same page, though perhaps with a more cautious attitude. And while this might not necessarily constitute earth-shattering news, it shows that we as a global community can work together, or at least try to, if not to eradicate childhood obesity altogether, then at least to alleviate the issue using the same tools.

And those include GLP-1 medications. Sophie Cousins, MIPH, a global health journalist who has reported from more than 20 countries, dives into the subject for Medscape.

The rise of GLP-1 medications

Over the past few years, GLP-1 receptor agonists have gained global attention as effective treatments for obesity. As has been established and backed by research, these drugs act on the brain and the gut to curb appetite, slow digestion, and increase feelings of fullness.

In parts of Europe, medications such as liraglutide (Saxenda), semaglutide (Wegovy), and orlistat (Xenical) are already approved for use in adolescents aged 12 and older. But change may be on the horizon. Novo Nordisk has applied for regulatory approval of liraglutide in children as young as six years old in both Europe and the United States.

Early trial results are promising but mixed. In a phase 3 study, children aged 6 to 12 years who received 3 mg liraglutide plus behavioral therapy for 56 weeks saw a 5.8% BMI reduction, compared with a 1.6% increase in the placebo group. However, 80% of the children on liraglutide experienced gastrointestinal side effects.

These results raise a pressing question: Should children be treated with powerful weight-loss drugs, or should medical professionals and society focus more heavily on prevention?

Concerns over safety and equity

Some experts remain skeptical. Malta, for instance, has one of Europe’s highest rates of childhood obesity, driven largely by poor diet, inactivity, and socioeconomic factors. Renald Blundell, Ph.D., of the University of Malta, is deeply concerned about long-term safety.

He worries about the effects of GLP-1 medications on “growth, puberty, fertility, mental health, and lifelong health.” He stresses the need to monitor for issues such as anxiety and depression.

Dr. Blundell said:

Drugs don’t fix the unhealthy food environment, car dependency, poverty, or school systems that drive obesity. If relied on as the main solution, they risk overlooking prevention.

Still, he acknowledged their potential for children already struggling with severe obesity:

For children already suffering from severe obesity and related illnesses, medication can be life-changing and may give them a better chance to engage with lifestyle changes.

Blundell does not, however, support widespread use in children under 12:

We don’t yet know their long-term safety in young children. There are ethical concerns about medicalizing children, and their high costs and limited access to specialist care could cause inequities.

His conclusion was clear:

The bottom line is that GLP-1 drugs may be appropriate as an adjunct treatment for some children with severe obesity, but their use in 6- to 11-year-olds should be limited, cautious, and tightly monitored. The bigger priority is to change the environment, policies, and support systems so fewer children develop obesity in the first place.

Food policy and the bigger picture

Christina Vogel, Ph.D., a nutritionist and professor of food policy at City St George’s, University of London, echoed similar concerns. She said:

I don’t believe we have sufficient evidence to be able to confidently say they are good to use among children. Children’s bodies are growing, and we don’t know the long-term physical effects.

Vogel emphasized the responsibility of both governments and the pharmaceutical industry to protect children:

We need to get the school food environment right. We need to protect them against heavy marketing of high in fat, sugar, and salt. And we need to promote the availability, accessibility, and appeal of fruit, vegetables, and whole grains.

She also questioned whether children on these drugs might still eat poorly:

Will children continue to eat unhealthy foods because marketing hasn’t disappeared? Could children on these drugs face a higher risk for malnutrition and have more vitamin deficiencies?

Support for cautious use

Some specialists see GLP-1 drugs as a breakthrough, if used carefully. Julian Gomahr, M.D., of Paracelsus Medical University in Salzburg, Austria, noted that treating obesity was “frustrating” before these medications. He said:

We finally have effective medications available that can truly make a difference in treatment — especially when metabolic comorbidities are already present early on and lifestyle interventions have been exhausted. It is crucial that children are treated by an experienced team, particularly during the initial phase of pharmacological therapy.

He also argued that these drugs could reduce long-term healthcare costs but stressed that access must be equitable. He urged policymakers to fund both medications and interdisciplinary obesity centers to ensure children receive the care they need.

No silver bullet

Other experts emphasize that medication is only part of the picture. Annemarie Bennett, Ph.D., of Trinity College Dublin, made it clear: “There is no silver bullet for weight management in childhood.”

If GLP-1 drugs are prescribed, she argued, they should be integrated into a broader plan, such as “food-based and exercise supports, therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, and family therapy may be considered.” We agree!

She explained that overeating often stems from distress and difficult circumstances, such as “difficult relationships at home or in school, experiencing inappropriate methods of discipline, or bereavement.” Addressing these root causes remains critical. This is also something we’ve been discussing on Childhood Obesity News for years (and will continue to do so): displacement.

The road ahead

Regulatory decisions on expanding the use of GLP-1 medications to children under 12, as well as the arrival of daily weight-loss pills in the coming years, could reshape treatment.

But for now, the debate continues: how to balance access to promising new drugs with prevention, therapy, and long-term strategies to protect children’s health.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Should Children Be Prescribed Anti-Obesity Drugs?,” Medscape, 9/26/25
Source: “Liraglutide for Children 6 to <12 Years of Age with Obesity — A Randomized Trial,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 9/10/24
Image by Yan Krukau/Pexels

Mounjaro Shows Promise for Kids With Type 2 Diabetes, Study Finds

A new clinical trial has found that Mounjaro, a popular treatment already approved for adults, can significantly lower blood sugar and body weight in children as young as 10 living with Type 2 diabetes.

The findings could pave the way for wider access, as drugmaker Eli Lilly, which funded the study, works to expand the drug’s approval beyond adult patients. The study focused on tirzepatide, the active ingredient in both Mounjaro, used for Type 2 diabetes, and Zepbound, prescribed for weight management.

How the study worked

Researchers enrolled 99 participants between the ages of 10 and 17 who had obesity and poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes despite being on treatments like metformin or insulin. Over the course of 30 weeks, patients received either a weekly dose of 5 milligrams, or 10 mg of tirzepatide, or a placebo.

By the trial’s end, the differences were striking:

  • Blood sugar control: Patients taking tirzepatide saw their average A1C levels drop by 2.2%, compared with just 0.05% for those on placebo.
  • Reaching safe A1C levels: 71% of participants on 5 mg and 86% on 10 mg achieved an A1C of 6.5% or less, which is below the diabetes threshold. Only 28% of the placebo group did the same.
  • Body weight impact: Participants also saw major improvements in BMI. Those on 5 mg lost an average of 7.4% of their BMI, while those on 10 mg lost 11.2%, compared to just 0.4% in the placebo group.

 

Importantly, the benefits to blood sugar and BMI were sustained through 52 weeks with no signs of plateauing.

The study authors wrote:

Tirzepatide is the first drug used for Type 2 diabetes in this age group that has shown sustained clinically-meaningful, BMI-lowering effects.

Safety and side effects

The treatment’s safety profile looked similar to what’s been observed in adults. The most common issues were mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects, which generally eased over time. Two patients in the 5 mg group stopped treatment due to side effects.

Why this matters

Dr. Tamara Hannon, director of the Clinical Diabetes Program at Indiana University and lead investigator on the trial, said:

Youth living with Type 2 diabetes often face a more aggressive disease course, and in many instances, first-line treatments like metformin and basal insulin fail to control their A1C adequately… These results offer a promising opportunity to help shift the long-term health trajectory for young people living with this complex condition.

What’s next?

Eli Lilly has submitted the trial results to regulators worldwide, seeking approval for use in younger patients. Currently, the FDA has approved three GLP-1 drugs for Type 2 diabetes in kids 10 and older, and two for obesity in adolescents ages 12-17.

If approved, Mounjaro could become another powerful option in the fight against childhood obesity and Type 2 diabetes, two conditions that are rising at alarming rates in young people.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-PEDS)…,” The Lancet, 9/17/25
Source: “Drugs like Mounjaro can help kids as young as 10 lose weight and control blood sugar: new study,” New York Post, 9/19/25
Image by Pavel Danilyuk/Pexels

UNICEF Warns Childhood Obesity Has Surpassed Underweight Worldwide

Obesity has now overtaken underweight as the more common form of malnutrition among children, according to a new UNICEF report. The study, “Feeding Profit: How Food Environments are Failing Children,” reveals that 1 in 10 school-aged children and adolescents — about 188 million — are living with obesity, putting them at risk of serious, life-threatening diseases.

Pratik Pawar wrote for Yahoo:

Obesity in children isn’t just about size; it raises risks for Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and even certain cancers later in life. Starting so young makes the costs even higher. By 2035, being overweight and obesity are expected to drain more than $4 trillion a year globally — about 3 percent of the world’s GDP.

The report draws on data from more than 190 countries. Since 2000, underweight prevalence among children ages 5-19 has dropped from nearly 13% to 9.2%. At the same time, obesity has more than tripled, from 3% to 9.4%, and now exceeds underweight in every region except sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

Alarming trends across regions

The findings highlight especially high rates of childhood obesity in several Pacific Island nations. In Niue, 38% of 5-19-year-olds live with obesity; in the Cook Islands, 37%; and in Nauru, 33%. These figures have more than doubled since 2000, largely due to a shift away from traditional diets toward cheap, energy-dense imported foods.

Wealthier nations are not immune. For instance, 27% of children and adolescents in Chile are obese, along with 21% in the United States and 21% in the United Arab Emirates.

UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell commented:

When we talk about malnutrition, we are no longer just talking about underweight children… Obesity is a growing concern that can impact the health and development of children. Ultra-processed food is increasingly replacing fruits, vegetables and protein at a time when nutrition plays a critical role in children’s growth, cognitive development and mental health.

The health and economic costs

While undernutrition such as wasting and stunting remains a problem for children under five in many low- and middle-income countries, the prevalence of obesity among older children is rising quickly. Globally, 391 million children and adolescents, which is 1 in 5, are now overweight, with a significant proportion classified as obese.

The report stresses that this crisis is not about individual choices but about environments saturated with unhealthy foods. Ultra-processed products (high in sugar, salt, refined starches, and unhealthy fats) are dominating children’s diets. Schools and shops are filled with them, while digital marketing gives food companies unparalleled access to young audiences.

A UNICEF U-Report poll of 64,000 young people aged 13-24 across 170 countries showed just how pervasive this influence is. Seventy-five percent of respondents recalled seeing ads for sugary drinks, snacks, or fast foods in the previous week, and 60% said the ads made them want the products more. Even in conflict zones, 68% of young people reported exposure to such marketing.

The long-term costs are staggering. In Peru alone, obesity-related health impacts could cost more than US$210 billion. By 2035, the global economic toll of overweight and obesity is projected to exceed US$4 trillion annually.

Policies that make a difference

Despite the bleak outlook, there are success stories. Mexico, where ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks make up 40% of children’s daily calories, has banned the sale and distribution of these items in public schools. This policy shift has improved food environments for more than 34 million children.

UNICEF is urging governments, civil society, and global partners to act quickly by:

  • Enforcing strong policies such as food labeling, marketing restrictions, and taxes or subsidies to shift demand toward healthier foods.
  • Supporting social and behavior change programs that empower families to demand better food options.
  • Banning junk food sales and sponsorship in schools.
  • Safeguarding policy-making processes from food industry interference.
  • Strengthening social protection measures so vulnerable families can afford nutritious diets.

 

Russell emphasized:

In many countries we are seeing the double burden of malnutrition — the existence of stunting and obesity. This requires targeted interventions… Nutritious and affordable food must be available to every child to support their growth and development. We urgently need policies that support parents and caretakers to access nutritious and healthy foods for their children.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Obesity exceeds underweight for the first time among school-age children and adolescents globally — UNICEF,” UNICEF, 9/9/25
Source: “Child obesity level surpasses underweight cases worldwide for the first time, UNICEF warns,” UN.org, 9/9/25
Source: “For the first time, more kids are obese than underweight,” Yahoo.com, 9/15/25
Image by Porapak Apichodilok/Pexels

WHO Declares Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Essential Medicines

One of the world’s most in-demand medications has just earned a new designation: essential. The World Health Organization (WHO) has added semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy, to its Model List of Essential Medicines, alongside tirzepatide and other GLP-1 drugs.

This move is more than symbolic. By declaring semaglutide and tirzepatide “essential,” the WHO is signaling to governments worldwide that these treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity are not luxuries but critical tools for public health.

What does it mean to be an “essential” medicine?

The WHO’s essential medicines list has existed since 1977. It’s designed to highlight drugs that provide the greatest health benefits, with the goal of improving affordability and access globally.

Today, the list includes 523 medicines for adults and 374 for children. More than 150 countries rely on it to guide decisions about which medications to prioritize for purchase, insurance coverage, and distribution.

When a drug makes the list, it’s often a catalyst for lower prices, expanded insurance coverage, and wider availability. As Yukiko Nakatani, WHO’s assistant director-general for health systems, put it:

The new editions of essential medicines lists mark a significant step toward expanding access to new medicines with proven clinical benefits and with high potential for global public health impact.

Why GLP-1 drugs are game-changers

As we’ve discussed before, the GLP-1 receptor agonists mimic natural hormones that regulate hunger, metabolism, and insulin response. For diabetes, they reliably help patients control blood sugar, reducing complications and improving long-term outcomes. For obesity, they are far more effective for weight loss than diet and exercise alone, helping many patients lose significant, sustained weight. And for overall health, by addressing obesity and diabetes, they also lower risks for cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic illnesses.

Tirzepatide goes a step further by targeting not just GLP-1 but also GIP-1, another hormone involved in hunger regulation. The impact is already measurable. In the U.S., 2023 marked the first year in a decade that adult obesity rates declined, a trend many experts attribute to GLP-1s.

The accessibility is a problem, however

Despite their promise, GLP-1s are often out of reach for the people who need them most. This is due to a number of reasons, including:

  • High cost. Even after price reductions, monthly expenses can run into the hundreds of dollars.
  • Limited insurance coverage. In the U.S., many public and private insurers do not cover these drugs for obesity, restricting access to wealthier patients.
  • Global inequity. In many countries, access is even scarcer, despite diabetes and obesity being rising global health threats.

 

Deusdedit Mubangizi, WHO’s director of policy and standards for medicines, emphasized the urgency of addressing this gap:

Achieving equitable access to essential medicines requires a coherent health system response backed by strong political will, multisectoral cooperation, and people-centered programs that leave no one behind.

What the WHO’s decision could change

By adding semaglutide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide to its essential medicines list, the WHO is paving the way for broader access. Some potential outcomes include generic development, for one. Canada is expected to approve the first generic semaglutide as early as 2026. In the U.S., however, generics likely won’t arrive until 2031.

The designation could also pressure drugmakers to reduce prices and encourage governments to negotiate more aggressively. The other two potential outcomes include better insurance coverage as public and private insurers may be more willing to cover drugs considered essential, and wider distribution, where primary care doctors could play a bigger role in prescribing GLP-1s, not just specialists.

Adding GLP-1s to the WHO’s essential medicines list is about more than lowering blood sugar or reducing waistlines. It’s a recognition that obesity and diabetes are among the world’s most pressing health challenges, and that effective tools to treat them must be accessible to all, not just the privileged few. As more countries act on this designation, millions of people may finally gain access to medications that can improve — and even save — their lives.

How it will play out globally remains to be seen, but let’s choose to be optimistic.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Ozempic Is an ‘Essential’ Drug, WHO Says as Agency Calls for Cheaper Generics,” Gizmodo, 9/5/25
Source: “WHO Includes Popular Anti-Obesity Drugs on Essential Medicines List for Diabetes Control,” Health Policy Watch, 9/5/25
Image by cottonbro studio/Pexels

Digital Tools in Pediatric Obesity Care

Childhood obesity continues to be one of the most pressing public health issues in the U.S. Beyond weight gain, the condition raises risks for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and emotional challenges that can carry into adulthood. While traditional, in-person programs remain valuable, many families struggle with barriers such as cost, travel, scheduling, and stigma.

That’s where telehealth and digital health interventions (DHIs) come in. These tools offer clinicians new ways to support patients through approaches that are scalable, family-centered, and easier to access. Let’s take a look at a piece penned by Mollie R. Cummins, Ph.D., RN, about the benefits of DHIs backed by research, recommended strategies for clinicians and parents, and current challenges.

What the research shows

Recent systematic reviews and clinical trials suggest that digital programs can do more than just help lower body mass index (BMI). Children who participate in well-designed DHIs have shown improvements in diet quality, increased physical activity, and better emotional well-being. Some programs also document reductions in body fat percentage, especially when combined with traditional clinical care.

Importantly, these findings align with the 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Clinical Practice Guideline, which encourages clinicians to consider digital tools as part of comprehensive obesity treatment.

Broader benefits beyond BMI

Cummins writes:

Beyond weight, DHIs have demonstrated benefits in nutrition, physical activity, and psychosocial health. Children engaged in digital programs consumed fewer sugary beverages, ate more fruits and vegetables, and became more active. Interventions that incorporated gamification or active video gaming promoted movement and reduced sedentary time. Importantly, several studies also documented improvements in quality of life, self-efficacy, and self-esteem.

Key strategies for clinicians

When using DHIs, clinicians should think beyond the technology itself and consider how to integrate these tools effectively into care. Here are some best practices:

  • Blend digital with traditional care. Programs work best when paired with in-person visits or established clinical management.
  • Engage parents actively. Family involvement improves adherence and helps reinforce healthy habits at home.
  • Focus on behavior and psychosocial goals. Increases in activity, improved diet, and boosts in self-esteem can be as meaningful as weight-related outcomes.
  • Prioritize interactive, tailored tools. Children stay engaged when programs feel relevant and enjoyable.
  • Plan for the long term. Short-term results are promising, but sustained change requires ongoing support and structured follow-up.

Barriers and challenges

While promising, digital interventions aren’t without hurdles. Clinicians need to anticipate challenges such as:

  • Declining engagement. Many families start strong but taper off after a few months. Booster sessions or scheduled check-ins may help maintain momentum.
  • Access and equity gaps. Not all families have reliable internet, digital devices, or the literacy to use them effectively. Screening for these issues is critical.
  • Safety considerations. Too much screen time or excessive focus on weight tracking can be counterproductive. Monitoring mental health and encouraging balanced use is essential.
  • Workflow integration. Without alignment to electronic health records or clinical processes, DHIs can add strain. Programs must fit seamlessly into care delivery.
  • Evidence variability. Not all digital tools are created equal. Clinicians should prioritize those with peer-reviewed research and transparent methods.

Digital obesity care of the future

Cummins writes:

The next phase of telehealth-supported obesity care will require innovation and clinical adaptation. These priorities are consistent with the World Health Organization’s global recommendations

Areas of growth include:

  • Personalized care pathways using artificial intelligence and data analytics to deliver real-time, adaptive feedback.
  • Wearable integration for tracking activity, sleep and nutrition, but only if clinicians can incorporate the data without overwhelming workflows.
  • Sustained models of care such as year-long hybrid programs that blend telehealth visits, digital coaching and community resources.
  • Family-centered design, ensuring interventions reflect cultural needs and practical realities.
  • Broader outcome measures, including sleep, self-esteem and social participation, not just BMI.

 

Summing it up, Cummins writes:

Telehealth and digital health interventions can be valuable tools for clinicians working with children and families affected by obesity. While weight reduction outcomes appear modest, the broader behavioral and psychosocial benefits are also important. By selecting evidence-based, interactive, and family-centered programs and by planning for long-term support, clinicians can use DHIs to expand access, increase engagement, and promote healthier futures for children.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Using Telehealth and Digital Health to Treat Childhood Obesity,” Telehealth.org, 8/27/25
Source: “Digital health interventions to treat overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: An umbrella review,” Obesity Reviews, 2/19/25
Source: “Digital health, technology‐driven or technology‐assisted interventions for the management of obesity in children and adolescents,” Cochrane Library, 7/10/25
Image by Tima Miroshnichenko/Pexels

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources