Yes to Prevention, But Also Access to Care

In her opinion piece in El Paso Matters, Dr. Lourdes Asiain, a pediatrician with more than 20 years of experience, makes a case for insurance coverage for treatment of obesity. We’ve also emphasized multiple times the importance of access to the best tools possible, not just to treat already-existing obesity but also to prevent it.

Fat-shaming and creating stigma around childhood obesity helps no one, and is likely coming from misguided notions and ignorance. We don’t know that person’s struggle, or their family’s. It might be an unfortunate side effect of a medical condition, or a side effect of the medication a person is taking for that condition. It might be caused by the situation in the family, or at school, or anywhere.

For years, childhood obesity has often been viewed as a problem that can be solved simply by eating less and exercising more. However, pediatric obesity specialists say that understanding has changed dramatically. Today, obesity is recognized as a complex chronic disease influenced by genetics, biology, hormones, environmental factors, and lifestyle — not a lack of willpower.

Despite significant advances in treatment, many families still struggle to access effective medical care because insurance coverage remains limited. As a result, children who could benefit from evidence-based therapies are often left without the support they need until serious health complications develop.

Childhood obesity continues to affect millions of young people across the United States. In Texas alone (where the author of the opinion piece lives), approximately one in four children between the ages of 6 and 17 is living with obesity, placing the state among those with the highest childhood obesity rates in the country.

We might sound like a broken record, but it’s worth repeating. Obesity can have lifelong consequences, such as an increased risk of developing diabetes, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, and more.

The effects extend beyond physical health. Many children also experience bullying, social isolation, anxiety, depression, and lower self-esteem, which can affect academic performance and overall quality of life.

Medical organizations increasingly emphasize that obesity should be treated like other chronic diseases. Instead of assigning blame, physicians encourage families to understand the biological factors that contribute to weight gain.

Dr. Asiain writes:

We would never tell a child with asthma, diabetes or cancer to simply “try harder” to overcome their condition. Yet, children living with obesity routinely face blame, stigma and judgment rather than receiving medical care. This stigma is uniquely destructive for young people still developing their sense of identity, confidence and self-worth.

Recognizing obesity as a disease rather than a personal failure can be transformative for families. It shifts the conversation away from guilt and toward treatment, allowing children and parents to focus on managing a medical condition instead of carrying unnecessary shame.

Today’s approach to pediatric obesity, Dr. Asiain points out, is far more comprehensive than it was just a decade ago. She writes:

Fortunately, medical science has advanced. Comprehensive obesity care includes nutrition counseling, behavioral interventions, physical activity support, FDA-approved medications, and, when clinically appropriate, metabolic and bariatric surgery — supported by telehealth to reach our rural communities. These treatments are not shortcuts. They are evidence-based medical interventions for a serious, costly chronic disease.

When patients in my practice have coverage for modern obesity treatments, the results are remarkable. I see significant weight loss, normalized lipid profiles and reversal of prediabetes.

While effective treatments exist, affordability remains one of the biggest obstacles for many families. Critics argue that insurance policies often cover illnesses caused by obesity, such as diabetes or heart disease, while refusing to pay for treatments that could help prevent those conditions in the first place. This creates a frustrating situation where families may be forced to wait until a child’s health worsens before coverage becomes available.

According to Dr. Asiain:

As physicians, we should never have to tell a suffering family that an effective treatment exists but is denied to them by an insurance loophole.

Experts agree that prevention remains essential. Access to healthy foods, regular physical activity, safe neighborhoods, and nutrition education all play important roles in reducing childhood obesity rates. However, prevention alone cannot help children who are already living with obesity. Those children often require individualized medical care, just as they would for asthma, diabetes, or other chronic conditions.

In another opinion piece, Dr. Barry Ramo drives this point home (which is something we’ve been doing as well). Research shows that family-based weight management programs can improve children’s weight and body mass index (BMI). To support healthier lifestyles, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the “5-2-1-0” approach: eat at least five servings of fruits and vegetables daily, limit recreational screen time to two hours, get one hour of physical activity each day, and avoid sugary drinks. Together, these simple guidelines encourage better nutrition, more exercise, and healthier routines for the entire family.

Treating obesity early may reduce the risk of serious health complications later in life while helping children develop greater confidence, improved mental health, and a better overall quality of life.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Opinion: Children with obesity deserve access to treatment, not stigma,” El Paso Matters, 7/15/26
Source: “Family-focused plan offers simple steps to address childhood obesity,” KOAT.com, 7/15/26
Image by Yan Krukau/Pexels

Childhood Obesity Not a Problem

Okay, then, what is the problem? Some folks think the problem is anybody who believes that an obese person needs counseling about the drawbacks of remaining in that condition, or who tries to find answers that can eliminate or at least alleviate the burden of carrying around a detrimental amount of fat.

Sadly, some folks preach that the main thing wrong with the world is anti-fat bias. They seem to believe that the slightest mention or hint that to remain obese would not be in an individual’s best interest is a vile insult which violates that individual’s humanity.

“Fat activists” like Virginia Sole-Smith think they have a duty to correct all the people who see obesity as an unhealthy state, or at least as a condition that could lead to health problems. She authored a book titled Fat Talk: Parenting in the Age of Diet Culture, which aims to correct the worldview of people who believe that childhood obesity is a problem that needs to be addressed.

The other side

Rachel Bowman wrote a review, and while Dailymail.com has since removed it from their website, we did copy it some time ago as research material. It is brought up now because the annoying mindset that inspired it has not disappeared.

With scorn for both “diet culture” and anti-fat bias, Sole-Smith has claimed that any attempt to control a child’s weight is bad. (However, it seems that folks hooked up to her Instagram account voiced strong disagreement, mentioning the increasing rates of both diabetes and of costs to healthcare systems.)

Sole-Smith has told journalists that her own kids are routinely served snacks and desserts because when parents restrict certain kinds of food (like the ones containing fat, sugar, and chemical additives), their children will grow up lacking the ability to make informed decisions about what is or is not suitable. It is an interesting theory, but one which has been widely contested.

Medical profession criticized

Folks who possess this mindset are angry that doctors presume to advise their patients to slim down, because weight loss cannot solve all medical problems. So, it seems they believe it should not be prescribed for, or attempted by, anyone at all — a rather narrow viewpoint, to say the least.

“Treat patients as they are” is one of the slogans, and on closer examination it does not make much sense. A doctor treats a patient with a hip fracture like a patient with a hip fracture — by attempting to correct that distressing and disabling condition. A doctor treats a patient with pneumonia like a patient with pneumonia — by trying to cure it and make sure it doesn’t return. We could go on like this all day, but hopefully, the point is made.

“Sure, go ahead and let the sick person continue to live with pneumonia. As long as they can do normal stuff like get back and forth to the bathroom, or hold a phone conversation, what’s the problem?” That is hardly a sane point of view, and any doctor who voiced it should probably be forbidden to practice.

Sole-Smith uses the example of drug addiction to assert that all patients, even addicts, “are worthy of dignity and respect… It doesn’t matter whether you caused it, doctors are supposed to meet you where you are.” Except for one thing… What kind of a lousy doctor would think it’s okay to leave the patient still being an addict? Around here, we too believe that a patient should be accorded every ounce of dignity and respect — while at the same time being advised that obesity is not a desirable condition to remain in, and that there are ways out of it.

Refutation

Bowman’s review included words from Kelly Brownell, professor emeritus of public policy at Duke University, who said,

I think it’s possible to simultaneously hold in your mind that the condition of obesity is concerning, while at the same time protecting the rights of the people who have it… You can think of many other parallels, like depression or alcoholism, where you don’t want the people who have these things to be stigmatized — there are clearly negative effects of that — but it doesn’t mean you discount the ravages of those diseases.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Fat activist who thinks childhood obesity is a myth”, MSN.com
Image by GDJ/Pixabay

How Young Is Too Young for GLP-1 Meds?

GLP-1 medications such as Wegovy and Zepbound have reshaped obesity treatment for adults and are increasingly being used to help adolescents with obesity. Now, a more challenging question is taking center stage: Should these medications be used in even younger children?

While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved some GLP-1 medications for adolescents ages 12 and older who meet specific criteria, a small but growing number of physicians are prescribing them off-label for elementary school-age children with severe obesity. The trend has sparked debate among healthcare providers, researchers, and parents over whether early intervention outweighs the unknown long-term risks.

Not all GLP-1 medications are approved for pediatric obesity treatment, and those that are have age restrictions. Wegovy, for example, is approved for chronic weight management in adolescents aged 12 and older who have obesity and meet certain medical requirements.

Doctors generally reserve these medications for children whose obesity has not improved despite comprehensive lifestyle interventions, including healthier eating habits, increased physical activity, and behavioral support.

The medications are not intended for children who simply want to lose weight. Instead, they are considered for young people with obesity who face increased risks for serious health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular disease.

Many obesity specialists argue that treating obesity early may prevent lifelong health complications. Clinical trials have shown that GLP-1 medications can produce significant weight loss in adolescents when combined with lifestyle changes. Physicians who support their use view obesity as a chronic disease that often requires medical treatment alongside healthy habits.

For some children with severe obesity, waiting until adulthood may allow health problems to progress. Dr. Jessica Reilly, medical director of the Strong4Life pediatric obesity clinic at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, sees the consequences firsthand:

I see kids who have developed Type 2 diabetes at 10, 11 years old… They need help so desperately.

Although GLP-1 medications are approved for obesity beginning at age 12, some physicians are prescribing them off-label for children as young as six. One widely reported example involves nine-year-old twins Ayden and Kayden Gatlin-Wright. After years of unsuccessful efforts with diet, exercise, and nutritional counseling, doctors discovered the brothers carried a genetic mutation that affects feelings of fullness and increases their risk of obesity.

Despite working closely with healthcare professionals, their body mass index (BMI) continued to rise, and by age seven, they showed elevated blood sugar levels, abnormal cholesterol, and signs of liver dysfunction.

Their parents decided to pursue off-label treatment with Wegovy, paying approximately $700 every four weeks out of pocket for both children.

The medication appears to be helping. According to reports, Ayden’s BMI has declined by about 5%, while Kayden’s has fallen by roughly 7%. Beyond the numbers, their parents say the boys are developing healthier habits and enjoying more energy.

Despite encouraging early results, many pediatric experts urge caution. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of long-term research on children who might remain on these medications for many years — or even decades.

Questions remain about:

  • How long children may need to stay on GLP-1 medications
  • Whether weight returns after treatment stops
  • The effects of long-term use on growth and development
  • Potential nutritional deficiencies if children eat significantly less
  • Whether medication could unintentionally replace healthy lifestyle habits

Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Although uncommon, more serious complications can include pancreatitis and gallbladder disease.

Dr. Sarah Hampl, who works in the pediatric obesity program at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, believes more research is needed before expanding treatment to younger children. She said:

We do not have enough evidence to safely prescribe under 12 at this point… I think that potential is there for positive impact, but there are not enough studies yet.

Drug manufacturers are also proceeding cautiously. Novo Nordisk, the maker of Wegovy, does not promote off-label prescribing, although it is studying the medication in children as young as six. Eli Lilly is conducting similar research with Zepbound.

Even among families who have seen success with GLP-1 medications, the goal is not lifelong dependence on the drugs. The parents of Ayden and Kayden hope the medication will provide a window of opportunity for their sons to establish sustainable habits that last well beyond treatment. As their father explained:

They can learn to manage themselves, the exercise, the healthy habits, read their bodies properly. The goal is for them to learn that, you know, as they grow, this is going to be their life.

This perspective reflects the broader approach recommended by obesity specialists, who generally view medication as one part of a comprehensive treatment plan that includes nutrition, physical activity, behavioral counseling, and family support.

Even for patients who qualify, obtaining GLP-1 medications can be difficult because of cost and insurance coverage. To improve access for eligible older adults, Medicare launched the temporary GLP-1 Bridge Program on July 1. The program allows qualifying Medicare Part D beneficiaries to receive eligible weight-loss medications, including Wegovy and certain formulations of Zepbound, for a $50 monthly copay while broader coverage policies continue to evolve.

Families with younger children, however, often face significant financial barriers. Off-label prescriptions are frequently not covered by insurance, leaving parents responsible for hundreds of dollars each month.

For now, experts remain divided. While some see early treatment as an opportunity to prevent serious disease, others believe the science has not yet caught up with the growing interest in prescribing these medications to children under 12.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Fact Check Team: How young is too young for GLP-1 medications?,” The National News Desk, 7/10/26
Source: “Kids as young as six are being given weight-loss drugs as a way to curb obesity before it gets too late,” The Independent, 06/22/26
Image by Tima Miroshnichenko/Pexels

Till There Was Chicken Fat

Recently, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made the news by not doing too well in a noteworthy way:

We are giving parents, schools, and communities the tools to help children build healthy habits, strengthen their bodies, and discover what they’re capable of achieving.

Long before former First Lady Michelle Obama ever appeared in the news, a great leader ushered in an earlier health-conscious era, when childhood fitness was deemed essential as a pillar of America’s future. That man’s nephew recently said,

More than 60 years ago, my uncle, President John F. Kennedy, challenged America to make physical fitness a national priority because he understood that the strength of our nation begins with the health of our people…

By bringing back the Presidential Fitness Test and launching GetActive.gov/kids, we are giving parents, schools, and communities the tools to help children build healthy habits, strengthen their bodies, and discover what they’re capable of achieving.

The J.F.K. era was also presided over by a particular song, to which it is possible that more people have performed their calisthenics than to any other musical composition in history.

The anthem of that 1960s aspirational effort was “Chicken Fat,” which, aside from accompanying the largest total number of workouts, is a contender in another field: cringe-worthy lyrics. It’s so goofy, it is basically a self-parody.

There is nothing a gymnasium full of children or teenagers could do to it that it hadn’t already done to itself… and they had plenty of opportunity, because every school in America received a free phonograph record of “Chicken Fat.”

Who did it and why?

The creator of this masterpiece was Meredith Willson, more generally and widely known as the creator of “The Music Man” (which, incidentally, also included a song later recorded by the Beatles, “Till There Was You.“)

The government needed to send phonograph records into 142,000 schools, and several patriotic professionals stepped up to make it happen. Willson donated all his efforts for free, and so did Robert Preston, who was filming The Music Man at the time. During a break from the set, he slipped away to record “Chicken Fat.”

The original disc held the shorter “radio edit” on one side and the six-minute version for school gym class on the other. Capital Records made the actual discs for free, and they were often shipped with a printed instruction card illustrating the exercises, designed by a college football coach.

The Junior Chamber of Commerce got in on the act, financing the purchase and delivery of 50,000 copies to schools. Eventually, one way or another, American schools received around half a million free copies of the record, and some schools still faithfully carried out its instructions into the 1980s.

Plenty of Chicken Fat to go around

YouTube.com offers multiple versions of the song, including a very lively and humorous version from the University of Evansville Cheer Squad. This official website includes a summary of the fitness program’s history, methods, intentions, and aims, designed to reach into every school in the nation, and not only to arrive in those institutions, but to change the very nature of their goals and ambitions.

It goes without saying that the concept of achieving fitness was intended to move from the educational setting into every home in America. And into the military establishment if need be. Then, as now, the nation experienced a shortage of young men who could do Push-up #1, and then along came this perky, annoying song telling them to do 10. As we learn from material written by an uncredited author:

First, during and after World War II, the US Military became concerned over the high number of young men who, when drafted, proved to be too physically unfit to become part of the US Armed Forces. (Imagine what they would find today!)

Any new idea can attract more attention with some variety of fun, though it might be risky, because notions about what is or is not fun tend to vary widely. Speaking of fun, any aficionado will enjoy this Chicken Fat quiz, and may discover they don’t know as much as they thought.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “RFK Jr. mocked online after failing public fitness test,” MSN.com, undated
Source: “Secretary Kennedy Restores the Presidential Fitness Test, Launches Get Kids Active,”
www.HHS.gov, 06/29/26
Source: “Go You Chicken Fat, Go!,” YouTube.com, undated
Source: “University of Evansville Cheer Squad,” undated
Source: “Go, Chicken Fat, Go!,” LOC.gov, undated
Source: Boomers: “Do you remember exercising in school to ”Chicken Fat”?”, MeTV.com, 06/22/26
Image source: Pat Hartman

Another Nation Jumps on the Banned-Wagon

Globally, one in five children aged 5-19 is overweight, according to journalist Charity Kilei. Our blog has previously tackled the subject of what happens when a nation becomes fed up with the careless and irresponsible feeding of children. Since governments, for various reasons, cannot or will not stop companies from selling products they should be ashamed to call edible, decisions have been made aimed instead at reducing awareness of those products’ existence.

Relentlessly, childhood obesity has invaded here, there, and everywhere. In recent years, one country after another has become fed up with using its resources to treat increasing numbers of cases of heart disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and other maladies, even including some cancers, that result from HFSS diets — those initials representing, of course, high levels of fat, salt, and sugar.

The Earth groans under multitudes of overweight children. Of course, the statistics vary somewhat from place to place, but in general, worldwide, among the 5- to 19-year age span, one young person among every five is carrying around too many pounds, liters, stones, kilograms, or whatever the local unit of measurement happens to be.

A long history

For centuries, the religious establishment has recognized that if education is left in its hands until a child reaches the age of 7, the indoctrination pretty much lasts for a lifetime. Junk food advertising works in exactly the same way.

As mentioned, it has been a while since Childhood Obesity News brought up this topic, but the archives are bounteously filled with it. An 11-part series on “Selling Crap to Kids” appeared here three years ago. Quite some time before that, we featured a five-part series on “Television Advertising and Childhood Obesity.” But despite our best efforts (and those of multiple concerned organizations), the situation has continued to deteriorate.

Around the world with junk food

Kilei names France, Norway, Sweden, and South Korea as countries that have already enacted measures to limit the sort of advertising that children, to their detriment, were routinely absorbing. In the United Kingdom, the decision has been made to keep the harmful advertising off television before 9:00 in the evening, and around the clock on the Internet:

The UK government estimates the new regulations will remove up to 7.2 billion calories from children’s diets each year, prevent around 20,000 cases of childhood obesity, and generate approximately £2 billion in long-term health benefits.

In England, nearly one-quarter of all the children who start primary school each year are already overweight, and by the time they are through with those grades, the number is more like 35%. But this is not the only issue. In the 5-to-9-year age group, the major reason for hospital admissions is tooth decay. For this and other reasons, the U.K. had already cracked down on “soft drinks,” which, though they are filled with sugar, exert an effect that is far from sweet on the children’s health and the nation’s budget.

The Food and Drink Federation (FDF) even started to voluntarily comply early, last fall, partly encouraged by the fact that they are still permitted to advertise sugar-free versions of oat cereal granola, and muesli:

In Kenya, if current trends persist, projections suggest that by 2030, more than 1 million children aged 5–19 could be living with obesity.

Kenya is also planning tighter controls to better protect children. There, the Ministry of Health announced plans to, if not forbid, at least tame the commercial glorification of unhealthy foods, and is developing a Nutrient Profile Model to illustrate the expectations regarding the promotion of salt, sugar, and saturated fats.

Countries that are working on this issue look to the pioneers like Singapore, where “similar policies have been effective.” But the World Health Organization (WHO) has not found voluntary measures alone to be successful anywhere:

Globally, an estimated 188 million children and adolescents aged 5-19 are living with obesity, representing about 9.4 per cent of that age group. This marks a sharp rise from around 3 per cent in 2000. In total, approximately 391 million children and adolescents aged 5-19 are overweight.

Somehow, and this does not speak well for us as responsible citizens and parents, the government always has to get involved and make laws if real progress is to even be hoped for.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “UK follows France, Sweden and South Korea in banning junk food ads for children,” EastLeighVoice.co.ke, 01/05/26
Image by Laborrate/Pixabay

The Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity

Who amongst us has not wished for a top-notch resource containing almost 200 podcast episodes, along with transcripts of those broadcasts? Obviously, we are talking about the University of Oxford’s interdisciplinary research unit that endeavors to decode “the complex and interwoven causes of obesity in populations across the world.”

With each individual work available as either a podcast or a transcript, the Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity (UBVO) is a spectacular collection of information compiled by some of the smartest scholars on the planet. For proof of that assertion, let’s look at the work of Zofia Boni, titled “Fatness and the Body,” which is concerned specifically with childhood obesity as viewed through the lenses of both biomedical research and social constructivism.

Although Boni did not set out to specifically study obesity, her work experience and academic studies have included “anthropology, food, anthropology of childhood, as well as socialist studies and feminist scholarship,” while current and future work includes such diverse fields as “social anthropology, quantitative sociology, epidemiology, climate science, demography and physics.”

Among the questions for which she seeks answers are:

Where or what is the difference between obesity and fatness, and who has the right to decide that, and also why is that important?

How and why has obesity changed in the way in which is it constructed as a public problem?

How do different actors, especially children, experience childhood obesity?

The scholar has interviewed a slew of professionals who work with children in the areas of overweight and obesity, including “psychologists, nutritionists, dietitians, medical doctors, physical activity experts, and more.” In the field work aspect of her investigations, with children and their parents, she was often made acutely, even painfully, aware of the many ramifications and connotations of these studies.

Every answer brought forth more questions. Is obesity a disease or a condition that causes other diseases? Should childhood obesity be defined and treated as a public health crisis? As an epidemic?

Awkward questions

One aspect that appears problematic is the continuing use of BMI measurements on children, “sort of assuming that obesity is only about excessive weight and always about excessive weight.” And an ongoing question is exactly what the distinction is, or should be, between overweight and obesity.

Even worse is to drag morality into the equation, causing an individual biomedical problem to become a “social, socially constructed form of biomedical oppression.” Enough oppression already exists in the form of “wider social processes, such as inequalities in education and employment opportunities, and environmental exposure to pathogens and pollution…”

Fatness and obesity are often treated as two names for the same phenomenon, but is that a basic error that impedes progress in the field? There is also something distasteful about the widespread assumption that childhood obesity is chiefly caused by mothers and expected to be dealt with mainly by mothers.

How and why did flab make the shift from being pretty much a personal problem, all the way to becoming a matter of public concern? How can it be prevented and/or treated without bringing harmful stigmatization into the picture? How do actual people, especially children, experience not only obesity, but the role of public enemy into which it seems that factions of society often try to cast them?

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity (UBVO) seminars,” OX.ac.uk, undated
Source: “Series name: Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity (UBVO) seminars,”
Podcasts.ox.ac.uk, undated
Image by Kyrnos/Pixabay

Ways to Quiet Food Noise in Children

For many people, the term “food noise” became familiar through conversations about GLP-1 weight-loss medications such as Wegovy. However, health experts emphasize that food noise isn’t limited to adults. Children and teenagers can also experience persistent thoughts about food that affect their emotional well-being, relationships with eating, and overall quality of life.

Much has been written about food noise on this blog, but it doesn’t hurt to revisit this topic with emphasis on food noise in kids in particular and what parents can do to quiet it. But first, let’s briefly reiterate what food noise is, how it develops, and what signs to look for.

According to pediatrician Daniel Ganjian, M.D., FAAP, food noise is “the constant, intrusive chatter in a person’s mind regarding food, eating, and cravings.” (He is quoted in a recent article focusing on the topic in Parents magazine.) For some kids, it becomes challenging to focus on school, sports, friendships, or other daily activities.

So, how does food noise develop? Experts say that it doesn’t necessarily have one cause. Instead, it results from several factors working in tandem. Those can include genetics, hormonal changes, and exposure to food advertising targeted at kids. And because children’s brains are still maturing, they may have a harder time managing repetitive thoughts and cravings than adults.

For someone who has never experienced food noise, it can be difficult to understand. Therapist and certified eating disorders specialist Alli Spotts-De Lazzer, LMFT, LPCC, CEDS-C, compares it to having a song endlessly repeating in your head. Just as a catchy holiday tune can play on repeat long after you’ve left the store, food-related thoughts can continually return throughout the day.

She explains:

There’s nearly always food close by, available, or purchasable, and there can feel like an urgency to act on the noise to quiet it.

While food noise is frequently discussed alongside obesity, experts caution that its effects go well beyond body weight. According to Gabriella Clarke, RD, LD, CEDS-C, persistent thoughts about food can take an emotional toll:

Some children may feel as though their thoughts about food are out of control, and this has the potential to increase feelings of guilt or shame with eating.

While parents cannot eliminate food noise entirely, they can create habits and routines that help reduce its intensity. Those include sticking to eating routines, for one. Regular meals and snacks help children know when food will be available, reducing anxiety and uncertainty.

Pediatric endocrinologist Michelle Maresca, M.D., says:

When a child can anticipate when they will next eat, they are less likely to obsess over it.

Eating consistently throughout the day also helps prevent extreme hunger, which can lead to overeating before fullness cues have time to register. Experts generally recommend offering three balanced meals along with two or three planned snacks, rather than allowing long gaps between eating opportunities.

Another example is to keep meals distraction-free: no screens at the table (TV, tablets, phones, etc.). This will ideally result in children focusing on eating, conversation, and recognizing when they feel full.

Unfortunately, completely banning favorite foods may unintentionally make them even more appealing. To reduce feelings of deprivation and lessen the urge to overeat them later, parents can occasionally allow desirable foods but overall consistently offer balanced, healthy meals.

Nutrition experts also recommend not labeling food as “good” or “bad.” Giving foods moral labels may increase a child’s preoccupation with eating and give their food choices unnecessary emotional weight. So avoid terms like “junk food,” “cheat foods,” or calling desserts “treats.”

Finally, mind how you talk about people’s bodies in front of your kids, and with your kids, including their own. Children learn from what they hear at home. Conversations about dieting, weight, or criticizing your own body can influence how they think about themselves. Experts encourage parents to avoid assigning value to bodies based on size, shape, or appearance. Focusing instead on health, strength, enjoyment, and self-care helps build a more positive body image.

Easier said than done, we know. But parents can play an instrumental role in shaping their kids’ relationship with food early on. Knowing this should be (ideally) encouragement enough.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Why ‘Food Noise’ Can Start in Childhood — and 5 Ways Parents Can Help,” Parents, 7/3/26
Source: “The Impact of Social Media on Adolescent Body Image: A Comprehensive Review,” NIH.gov, 8/26/25
Image by Nadine Sh/Pexels

Stumbled-Upon Shame

In the mind of a typical parent, there are several things that they hope a child will not grow up to be. Researching those possibilities, a journalist will occasionally run across something fascinating to pursue, and here is a great example from the archives of Tumblr.com. The material itself is more than 10 years old, authored by a female cartoon figure pseudonymously known as “edcynic.”

That page was accidentally found in the course of a search for the author of a 10-point list of items relevant to “The Shame of an Eating Disorder,” and here we will elaborate on that rather brief and brusque list, and add a bit of empathic imagination, with the purpose of capturing some of the more distinctive and awkward aspects of living with a pitiful secret that probably everyone around you has long ago guessed. If not treated, what does a binge-eating child have to look forward to?

“Who dunnit?”

Yes, it is easy to imagine the embarrassment when a roommate says, “Where’s that ice cream that was in the freezer?,” and you have to say, “Well, the empty and crumpled container is under the sink…” — especially when it is the third time this week that a supposedly shared treat did a disappearing act. The original author did not go into that much detail, but we know how to extrapolate.

And sure, you want to be as quiet as possible when raiding the refrigerator at 2 AM and everyone else is asleep. Still, that particular awkwardness can be avoided with careful planning, and the average binge eater probably catches on to the techniques of ninja-like stealth pretty early on.

The author mentions how shameful it is to realize that you can’t get to work or to school, or pick up the kids from their school, because you spent the gas money on food. But taking into account the number of people within a 10-mile radius who spent their gas money on crack or lottery tickets, it could be a lot worse.

You again…

A shame that cannot be avoided, unless you want to spend even more of that gas money driving around to stores outside your neighborhood, is the third, fourth, or fifth encounter this month with the same checkout clerk who also processed your last cartful of junk food, and the one before that…

Excessive exercise is a slow-motion purge method, lacking the elements of drama and urgency that a problem eater may be hooked on. And then, there are episodes that qualify as more than just a little embarrassing. Like calling off a plan to do something with friends, because it has become clear that staying home to binge and purge is really the only possible way your mental/emotional quirk will allow you to get through a Saturday night.

Binge-and-purge

In this equation, the “binge” element is simple. Just acquire plenty of edible items made from flour, sugar, fat, and additives. Eat as much of that stuff as possible. So far, the program is pretty straightforward.

The “purge” part is when it gets complicated. Vomiting can be induced in a couple of different ways, and is rough on the digestive system, and expensively destructive to the teeth. However, it is a relatively quick process that can successfully be accomplished in a public restroom or a friend’s bathroom, or even outdoors.

Alternately, the resulting waste may be let out through the other end. A person can swallow a substance to induce diarrhea, a choice that involves the constant threat of exposure in the most elemental, irrefutable way. And, depending on how much you like your job and/or your paycheck, you need to be technically adept at the precise self-administration of your laxatives on workdays. This purge method can also damage a person’s innards, and is not recommended by any sane individual.

A tough one

According to journalist Paula Spencer Scott, binge eating disorder (BED) is “one of the most common eating disorders.” WebMD offers a concise page covering the pertinent categories of questions that parents may have if they don’t want binge eating disorder to become a part of their child’s future.

What should a parent watch for? Exactly how harmful can it be to overall health? At what point is it appropriate for a parent to say, “Okay, this needs to be addressed”? What are the treatment options? What about prevention? And more…

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Pro-Anas and Their Ridiculous “Mono” Diets,” edcynicArchive.tumblr.com, undated
Source: “Binge Eating Disorder in Kids and Teens,” WebMD.com, 02/14/26
Image by Ricinator/Pixabay

Embracing Shame and Blame

Members of the general public who tend to hunt for scapegoats can’t help noticing a huge category of humans who are eligible to receive a share of the blame for the crushing expense of modern life: the population of obese children, along with their parents, who seem to be co-conspirators in a plot to make everyone else go bankrupt.

Some families receive government assistance with their medical bills, which may be caused or exacerbated by a child’s unfortunate condition. At any given time, there is only so much money to go around, and one school of thought says that available funds should only be spent on kids whose condition was 0% caused by any actions of their own, or by any neglect or wrongdoing on the part of their parents.

And it must follow, as night follows day, that in a universe shaped like that, childhood obesity is always 100% the parents’ fault.

Yes, in certain circles, a child’s obesity is fondly accepted as being his, or her, and/or the parents’ exclusive problem. Each time a medical professional or institution is paid to alleviate a situation caused by obesity, it reduces the funding available to cure children whose medical problems cannot be dismissed as their own fault.

It means that some other child might not obtain help at all. It is the sort of public budget scandal, based on half-baked evidence and janky reasoning, that some taxpayers love to be upset by.

Universal participation

Of course, overweight kids and their progenitors are not the only recipients of blame in modern society. Shamers get blamed too, and blamers also are shamed. There are plenty of bad feelings to go around! Some grownups are blamed for trying to make overweight people feel not just lousy about themselves, but unworthy of human consideration, period. Moreover, obesity arguments tend to metastasize into every aspect of life.

For instance, more than one critic has pointed out that the average passenger airplane seat is an inch and a half narrower than its counterpart of two decades ago. And yet, the average passenger’s rump is not 1.5 lateral inches slimmer than those of his immediate ancestors. Or even close. It gets worse. Some frequent flyers report, instead, that seat width has actually narrowed by an entire two inches, while “leg room” is now as mythical as a leprechaun.

Meanwhile, folks with other interests note that, although airplane seats may have shrunk, theater seats have widened. And yet, that is not universally appreciated. In another context, a different anonymous online malcontent recently complained that theater is a dying art form because the seats are still too small. In their opinion, to discriminate against large-bottomed moviegoers is a losing strategy for an art form that hopes to stay relevant in this day and age.

Freedom of speech

It is not surprising that the more secret a website allows posters to be, the more open their communications become. A pseudonymous woman, for instance, might point out that “Fat people deserve dignity, fat people deserve to be treated with respect, fat people deserve to have their healthcare concerns taken seriously and their healthcare needs met.”

Confronted by unsympathetic normies, some correspondents take great care to explain just why their weight is so difficult to control, while others declare with explosive anger that the reason why a person is fat is nobody’s business and doesn’t matter anyway, when it comes to a basic issue like common courtesy. No one owes a rude stranger, or even a polite one, any justification for their own existence.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Image by Wadams/Pixabay

Some Doctors Are Prescribing GLP-1 Weight-Loss Drugs to Children Under 12

How young is too young for GLP-1 meds? The use of GLP-1 weight-loss medications in children continues to expand, but a growing number of physicians are raising questions about whether these drugs should be prescribed to children younger than 12 years old.

Although medications such as Wegovy (semaglutide) are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating obesity in adolescents ages 12 and older, some physicians are prescribing them off-label to younger children with severe obesity. The practice reflects the difficult choices doctors face as childhood obesity rates rise and obesity-related health complications appear at increasingly younger ages.

At the same time, many pediatric specialists caution that there is still too little research to understand the long-term effects of these medications on young children’s growth and development.

As has been established, GLP-1 receptor agonists, including Wegovy, help regulate appetite by slowing stomach emptying and increasing feelings of fullness, often leading to significant weight loss. For children under 12, however, these medications have not been approved by the FDA for obesity treatment. Physicians who prescribe them are doing so off-label, which is a legal and common medical practice in some circumstances when a doctor believes the potential benefits outweigh the risks.

According to reporting by The Wall Street Journal, some pediatric obesity specialists say they are seeing severe obesity-related complications in children at increasingly younger ages. Conditions that were once considered adult diseases, including high blood pressure, elevated blood sugar, and fatty liver disease, are now appearing in children as young as four years old. Four! Just think about that.

Doctors who support earlier use of GLP-1 medications argue that traditional interventions often do not produce enough weight loss for children with severe obesity. While intensive nutrition counseling, physical activity programs, and behavioral therapy remain the foundation of treatment, many children continue to struggle despite these efforts. For some families, physicians believe medication may offer another tool to reduce health risks before permanent complications develop.

Despite the potential benefits, many experts urge caution. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of long-term research involving younger children. Scientists still do not fully understand how years of GLP-1 treatment might affect a child’s bone growth, brain development, nutritional status, and future weight regulation after stopping medication.

Because children are still growing physically and neurologically, specialists say more evidence is needed before these medications can be widely recommended for elementary school-aged patients. Some physicians also worry about whether children who stop taking the medications could rapidly regain weight, potentially creating additional health challenges later in life.

Current recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) continue to emphasize intensive, family-based behavioral treatment as the first-line approach for childhood obesity. The AAP recommends intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment for children six years and older with obesity.

Another recommendation is to consider weight-loss medications beginning at age 12, when appropriate, as an addition to lifestyle treatment. The organization does not currently recommend routine use of anti-obesity medications in children younger than 12 because there is insufficient evidence regarding safety and effectiveness in this age group.

Dr. Sarah Hampl, who chaired the development of the AAP’s obesity treatment guideline, has stated that more research is needed before these medications can be safely recommended for younger children. Although these medications are not yet approved for younger children, research continues.

Drug manufacturers, including Novo Nordisk, are conducting clinical trials evaluating medications such as Wegovy and Saxenda in children as young as six years old. These studies aim to determine whether the medications are both safe and effective in younger pediatric populations. The results could eventually influence future FDA approvals and pediatric treatment guidelines.

The debate highlights the difficult decisions physicians and families face when treating severe childhood obesity. On one hand, delaying effective treatment may allow obesity-related diseases to progress during critical developmental years. On the other hand, introducing medications before long-term safety is fully understood raises legitimate concerns about children’s growth, development, and lifelong health.

For now, experts generally agree that healthy nutrition, increased physical activity, behavioral support, and family involvement remain the cornerstone of pediatric obesity care. Whether GLP-1 medications will become a standard treatment for children under 12 will likely depend on the results of ongoing clinical research.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Wegovy and other GLP-1s are reaching kids,” NewsNation, 6/28/26
Source: “When Diets Don’t Work: Parents Turn to Wegovy for Elementary School Kids,” The Wall Street Journal, 6/22/26
Source: “Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 RAs in Children and Adolescents With Obesity or Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” NIH.gov, 12/1/25
Image by Atlantic Ambience/Pexels

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.