Questions About Food Desert Assumptions

Deprivation amplification refers to the tendency of poverty to complicate and worsen situations that could be more readily handled by those in a relatively stable economic situation. For instance, when someone is evicted, their economic class makes it either more likely or less likely that they will have a relative who owns a rental apartment, or who has an empty guest house, or a vacation cottage that may not be ideal, but does at least provide a roof. Those options are not open to an inner-city single parent who was raised in the foster care system.

Another example of how being poor makes things worse is in the current news. Payday lenders located in strip malls are positioned and enabled to soak their captive customers even worse than banks do their middle-class clients. This ties to the previous post, which covered deprivation amplification.

Sally Macintyre, one of the authors of the paper that deals with this subject, has more to say about it. She draws a distinction between individual determinants, like the particulars of the person’s dilemma in our first example; and the factors that affect large groups of people, and that have become institutionalized.

There are features of the physical and social environment that either promote health, or damage health. Macintyre says,

Such environmental features may be modifiable, and environmental changes may help promote healthier behaviors.

But here’s the thing. Even when conditions are amenable to modification, how much evidence should be demanded before society takes extreme steps like making new laws? Will the change actually create change? Is it possible that we sometimes single out the wrong targets for reform? Specifically, are we getting our shirt in a knot over the food desert concept, when we should be looking elsewhere for the villain?

According to Macintyre, research into the distribution of facilities and resources shows that “location does not always disadvantage poorer neighborhoods.” She says,

It may not always be true that poorer neighborhoods are more likely to lack health promoting resources, and to be exposed to more health damaging resources. It may also be that the presence or absence of resources is less important than their quality, their social meaning, or local perceptions of their accessibility and relevance.

The point being, what that evictee in the example above needs is a generous aunt with a second home that just happens to be available, which is not in our societal power to give. What we can do, collectively, is make it harder to evict tenants without good cause; and force our city to relax zoning regulations so that more affordable housing can be built. We can legislate against allowing lenders to charge exorbitant interest.

The point of all this is, even though the activities of retail food outlets do come under the heading of things that can be modified, Macintyre and others are in doubt. While we can offer incentives for grocery stores to open in food deserts, the effort might be futile, and even counterproductive, because it costs the taxpayers something to offer those incentives. Some studies showed that better food availability did not improve a neighborhood’s health to any appreciable extent.

In 2007, Macintyre threw a wet blanket over the whole food desert idea:

Even at the time at which this term was receiving wide currency, there was very little empirical evidence about the existence of food deserts. Three studies in the UK often cited as proving the existence of food deserts mainly concentrated on the price of healthy compared with unhealthy food, and did not examine the location of food outlets.

Another study in the UK found that despite government beliefs that low income groups have difficulties in accessing and affording fruit and vegetables, few low income participants said that they experienced any difficulty visiting supermarkets, or perceived any problems in the choice of shops, or of fruit and vegetables, in their local area.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Deprivation amplification revisited; or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity?,”, 07/26/07
Photo credit: Erica Zabowski on Visualhunt/CC BY-ND

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:


Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources