Matters Worth Pondering

Unfortunately, there is more to say about bulimia, binging and purging, and the connection (or not) between severe, life-threatening eating disorders and the obesity epidemic that has, over the past few decades, inexorably overtaken large segments of humanity.

We have seen how individuals who are into binging and purging, or binging without purging, or purging only, have all kinds of unusual traits (such as being unable to see their mirror reflections accurately) and unconventional ideas (like a longing for non-existence.)

They quote slogans like “Why am I not dead yet” (without a question mark, which makes it sound more like a declaration of intent.)

In this realm of knowledge, it seems as if every answer spawns more questions:

— Why do many eating disorder victims declare themselves as having a very real death wish?
— Is that self-hatred related to the culture’s disgust in regard to obesity?
— Does the effort to end childhood obesity drive the tendency toward anorexia and bulimia?
— Does the same impulse to self-harm which drives the kids who starve themselves, also motivate the kids who seem determined to eat themselves into an early grave?
— Do both of those conditions stem from the same root cause?
— Do people in both those camps see themselves as doing these aberrant behaviors for the same reasons, even though the end results are radically different?
— Do they perceive themselves as doing for different reasons the harmful behaviors that culminate in identical results?

Here is a tough one: In light of the widespread concern over both childhood and adult obesity, what are we to make of the fact that services and institutions are much more likely to cater to severely underweight anorexics than any other type of eating-disordered patient? Anorexia accounts for only less than 10% of eating disorder sufferers, and even among anorexics, the majority are not in the life-threatened category.

Is it the glamour? Perhaps coaxing a person of waif-like thinness to partake of nourishment is aesthetically more appealing than convincing a tub-of-lard-proportioned individual to stop eating so much.

As for victims of the unglamorous disorder known as binge eating, the writer Róisín points out that due to societal fatphobia and other factors, it seems that the medical profession “does not view them as worthy of resources.” There are pragmatic and political aspects. Róisín goes on to say,

Whilst crime is treated as the problem in and of itself, instead of as a result of poverty and state abandonment, eating disorders are similarly seen as the primary issue to solve, instead of a symptom of a wider problem… By applying a universal approach to a complex mental illness, treatment perpetuates the very problem it professes to be solving… We cannot rely on getting rid of an eating disorder whilst coping with the same circumstances that enabled the illness to develop in the first place…

The issue has been contemplated from even more doctrinaire points of view. Alice Weinreb writes of how “second-wave feminists… analyzed anorexia and bulimia as a way to articulate the dangers posed by postwar consumer capitalism for girls and women”:

The analysis hinged upon the paradoxical meaning of consumption in postwar capitalism, which was the cause of and symbolized by the deadly self-denial of the anorexic and the irrational gorging and purging of the bulimic. Eating disorders thus expressed the gendered and destructive impacts of late-modern capitalism on the female body, combining the demand for unbridled consumption and individual empowerment with expectations of female self-denial and physical smallness.

So, there is a lot going on. As previously noted, one trait that people who binge tend to share is a total lack of discrimination. Food preferences have nothing to do with it. They will consume whatever happens to be available, regardless of quality; and whether they like it, or even hate it, is irrelevant. Basically, no food is off-limits, When the urge to stuff themselves hits, all bets are off. Of what help, then, is any advice to identify “problem foods” and describe strategies to avoid them — when literally any food is a problem food to these individuals?

Here is a matter that parents would prefer not to think about. It harks back to Tom Jones, an entertainment film made more than 60 years ago, which included a “lusty dining scene” that attracted considerable attention and comment at the time. One reviewer referenced the “lascivious meal, a lusty marriage of food and sex.”

Critic Wook Kim wrote, “The dinner begins innocently enough, but their furtive glances soon turn into almost incandescent gazing: even a village fool can see where this is going.”

The question is… but what has this to do with the contemporary child who consumes a whole package of cookies in one sitting?

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Tom Jones (1963) – Lusty Dining,” YouTube.com, undated
Source: “Of Lust, Ladies, And Lobsters,” NPR.org, 08/06/09
Source: “Top Ten Memorable Movie Eating Scenes,” TIME.com, 01/05/12
Image by Jean Louis Mazieres/Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic

Online Weight-Loss Drug Providers Pivot to HRT

In an unexpected twist, the rise of online weight-loss drug providers is driving renewed interest in an older, once-stigmatized treatment: hormone replacement therapy (HRT). As more women seek solutions for menopause-related symptoms, including weight gain, online healthcare platforms are stepping in to fill the gap.

Why the change?

As we’ve previously discussed, regulators declared that popular weight-loss drugs Wegovy and Zepbound are no longer in short supply. As a result, consumers who have relied on less expensive, compounded versions — often obtained through telehealth services or medical spas — will need to find other options.

As reported in Stat,

In the last two years, hundreds of businesses have cropped up to meet the surge in demand for the obesity and diabetes medications known as GLP-1s. The majority prescribe compounded copies of the drugs — a tenuous business strategy as shortages of the branded versions of the medications have come to an end.

Now, some businesses are setting their sights on another opportunity in compounding: hormones.

This leaves consumers potentially having to shell out the big bucks for the branded versions, and telehealth companies finding another cash cow.

As explained in a recent SELF article,

In theory, the FDA’s removal of GLP-1s from its shortage list should mean any patient who needs the brand-name drugs will be able to get them. But it’s more complicated than that. While the compounded options that have been filling the gap aren’t FDA-approved (a red flag), they have been available at much lower prices — making their imminent illegality a potential access issue.

Why this matters

Many women struggling with menopause symptoms find themselves facing a shortage of specialized healthcare providers. Turning to the internet for solutions, they are increasingly discovering comprehensive telemedicine platforms that offer not only GLP-1 weight-loss drugs but also HRT. While this growing market provides convenient access to treatments, it also raises concerns about patient care quality, the safety of compounded medications, and the evolving nature of doctor-patient relationships.

A booming market

The global HRT market was valued at nearly $21 billion in 2022 and is projected to surpass $35 billion by 2030, according to Grand View Research. This rapid growth reflects increasing awareness and acceptance of menopause treatments that were previously difficult to obtain. The demand is also fueled by a broader consumer interest in health and wellness, along with the rising popularity of GLP-1 medications for weight management.

Beth Mosier, a director in West Monroe’s healthcare M&A group, notes that the expansion of GLP-1 offerings has created a natural pathway for integrating HRT. “It coincides with increased consumer demand for more holistic health solutions,” she says.

Major players enter the space 

The weight-loss and wellness industry is quickly adapting to this trend. Earlier this month, Noom announced its entry into the HRT market, joining platforms like Midi, which already offer both GLP-1s and HRT. Additionally, Hims & Hers is expanding its services to include care for perimenopause and menopause.

Women between the ages of 40 and 60 represent a key customer base for Noom, making HRT a strategic addition to their GLP-1 offerings. Noom CEO Geoff Cook says:

As menopause approaches, metabolic shifts occur, altering how the body processes sugars and fat, leading to symptoms like hot flashes, mood changes, and weight gain.

A 2023 Mayo Clinic study published in Menopause found that using HRT alongside GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy resulted in approximately 30% greater total body weight loss than GLP-1s alone. Other studies have echoed these findings, reinforcing the synergy between the two treatments.

The growing role of telehealth

For years, high-end medical aesthetic and wellness clinics have combined GLP-1 and HRT treatments to optimize weight management and overall health. Now, telehealth providers are embracing this model, offering convenient and often more affordable access to these therapies.

Mosier says,

They’re realizing they can address not just weight concerns but also muscle mass, sleep, and quality of life… Telemedicine is catching up to what high-end clinics have been doing for years.

The risks of direct-to-consumer care

Despite the benefits, the surge in direct-to-consumer HRT services comes with risks. Unlike traditional in-person care, online platforms shift more responsibility onto patients, particularly when compounded medications are involved.

Dr. Robert Kauffman, a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Texas Tech University, acknowledges the positive shift in attitudes toward HRT but raises concerns about the quality of care. He says:

Most of us who specialize in menopausal medicine are pleased that more women are open to hormone therapy… But are these services encouraging women to bypass in-person exams, where critical health information can be uncovered?

The financial incentives driving companies into this space also raise red flags. “There’s a huge profit motive,” Dr. Kauffman warns. “How often are these doctors following up with their patients?”

The bottom line

The intersection of weight-loss treatments and menopause care is creating new opportunities for both patients and healthcare providers. As telehealth platforms expand their offerings, they provide unprecedented access to treatments that were once difficult to obtain.

As with any rapidly growing market, caution is warranted. Women considering these services should weigh the convenience of telemedicine against the benefits of traditional in-person care, ensuring they receive comprehensive and safe treatment.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “As GLP-1 compounding stares down a wall, telehealth companies pivot to hormones,” STAT, 3/11/25
Source: “Online GLP-1 sales fuel hormone replacement therapy,” Axios, 3/11/25
Source: “Access to Compounded GLP-1s Is Drying Up. Here’s What to Know About the Copycat Weight-Loss Drugs.,” SELF, 3/13/25
Image by RDNE Stock project/Pexels

Why Am I Not Dead Yet

As previously suggested, the ED Support Forum and other websites of its kind might constitute either a blessing or a curse. We reviewed a few of the various suggestions offered to eating disorder sufferers involved with refeeding, and worse yet, with refeeding syndrome. That condition may lead to consequences as severe as seizures.

One young woman reported in a post that she had suffered three of them, but told no one “because then they would find out about my ED, lol.” Laugh out loud, indeed. A paranoid mind might suspect that the forum exists, literally, to support eating disorders themselves, rather than the overcoming of them.

The contradictions and restrictions involved in maintaining binge eating disorder are exhausting. Keeping up with all the rules is like a full-time job, and the prospect of suffering the equally self-imposed penalties is dreaded.

A phrase seems to turn up frequently in the forum questions and answers about the hellscape known as disordered eating: “Why am I not dead yet” — without a question mark, which seems to remove it from the realm of the ordinary interrogatory. Put that way, the tone is not questioning, but resigned. Seemingly, the only thing a victim hates more than the eating disorder is the prospect of release from it.

That lying mirror

A peculiarity of pathologically emaciated individuals is the inability to actually see themselves in mirrors, photos, or the flesh. To themselves, they look repulsively fat, always. A forum participant known as Hiraeth_, a bulimia patient who accumulated more than 5,000 posts on the site, reminisced about the time when she had made herself so ill the question was legitimate — “Why am I not dead yet?” In one post, she named her ultimate goal as “being so […] thin that even I can see it.”

To maintain her “ideal” weight of 50 kilograms (110 pounds) she binged and purged almost every day, and took laxatives multiple times per day. A court ordered her into a hospital, where despite observation and strict rules, she still managed somehow to almost kill herself. That episode was followed by a year of being “in and out of hospital so many times I lost count, literally.” She writes,

After that horrible year, it surprisingly went better. I didn’t get hospitalized for 14 months. Until last week, lol. I hope this rollercoaster won’t start over again. Because this time, I bet I can’t be saved.

The gender factor

For whatever reasons, few eating disorder studies include males, but, surprise!

Despite the stereotype that eating disorders only occur in women, about one in three people struggling with an eating disorder is male, and subclinical disordered eating behaviors (including binge eating, purging, laxative abuse, and fasting for weight loss) are nearly as common among men as they are among women.

One might think that this refers to gay men, but one would be mistaken. Despite the shortage of reliable and wide-ranging statistics, it is suspected that males binge almost as often as females, although females are more likely to purge. Furthermore, it appears that women are more likely to purge in reaction to “normal” consumption patterns, and in the absence of binge eating.

Back to the ED Support Forum, one individual reported that she or he had been binging and purging for nearly five years, yet their blood work remained “completely normal,” which is “a bummer” because “I’m kinda hoping this kills me but it might take longer than I intended.”

The whole mess raises philosophical questions that can probably not be answered, such as: What does this have to do with the worldwide epidemic of childhood obesity? In a sense, it is almost as if the BP (binge and purge) people are some strange order of penitents doomed to suffer their ailment to compensate for all the planet-smothering obesity.

Like religious zealots who parade through the streets flogging themselves with whips, it is their destiny to take upon themselves the world’s sins of overindulgence, and somehow restore balance to the cosmic order. The one thing they cannot abide is the sin of obesity.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Search results for query: refeeding,” EDSupportForum.com, 2023
Source: “Bulimia Discussions,” EDSupportForum.com, June 2016
Source: “Eating Disorders in Men and Boys,” NationalEatingDisorders.org, undated
Source: “Bulimia Discussions,” EDSupportForum.com, 2016
Image by Gareth Williams/Attribution 2.0 Generic

Mutual Aid for Eating Disorders

One dangerous aspect of the World Wide Web is that young people can go there to be coached on exactly how to slim down in hazardous ways, by experts, i.e. other kids — or worse yet, adults — who are only too happy to indoctrinate them. The uninhibited spread of dangerous knowledge has been an ongoing problem ever since online forums were invented.

The one consulted here is ED Support Forum, a useful font of information on these topics, for better or worse. It apparently intends to help people escape from problem conditions, but in the course of helping, of course, readers will unavoidably find out a lot about how to acquire and maintain dangerous conditions.

The site is a huge resource, sorted into categories, where even those with unusual and arcane issues can find kindred souls. For instance, they ask each other about refeeding syndrome — a frequent consequence of malnutrition, whatever the cause, and not a challenge for amateurs to be handling on their own. Refeeding is the process of reconditioning the patient’s body to accept food without going all haywire from electrolyte imbalance and other complications. Refeeding syndrome is when it goes all haywire anyway.

The looming hazard posed by refeeding syndrome is a major reason for wanting to make sure that misguided young people do not become involved with any of the pathological and often grotesque efforts to lose weight in unsafe ways. Asking advice from people in the same boat is not a great choice but it’s as far as many people will go. They’re giving each other advice about how to manage refeeding syndrome at home, on their own. One poster asks,

Has anyone ever been thru refeeding at home? Went 8 days fasting with very little liquid. Then tried consuming the last 3 days. Every time I try, I break out in sweats head to toe. Then nausea. My lower legs and feet and ankles are swollen and even after hours of elevation don’t go down much. I have passed out a few times. My blood pressure is low. Last check was 86/58.

This person goes on to say that they have social anxiety, and rarely leave home, so of course going to a hospital “isn’t an option.” So they request not to be offered any advice like calling 911 or visiting a doctor or the emergency room. But then their next post says they “did end up at ER sunday.” The poster wrote:

Because of malnutrition/starvation/dehydration my body is trying to hold on to fluid nutrients or whatever it can. Fluid in chest/abdominal wall is what is causing the pain… I’m weaker now than I was Sunday. Still swollen. Wt up 8 lbs from swelling. My stomach has been removed and I’ve had 3 bowel resections.

This really sounds like hell on earth, and another member of the forum confirms that “refeed edema is super painful… Stick to whole foods, avoid processed since processed has high levels of sodium,” and goes on to give other advice gleaned from research papers. Another amateur counselor notes that the mental health toll an eating disorder imposes can be devastating. Implementing “damage control” is exhaustingly time-consuming, and the whole process is something “you can really beat yourself up over.” They write,

You will have to challenge your perfectionism which the ED is tightly bound around, so that’ll freak it out. Unfortunately, challenging perfectionism a little might be what keeps you mentally and physically safer during your ED.

Another person, and just for ease of communication we’re going to assume this is a female, confides that her “ED brain” looks in the mirror and sees a big, fat blob that absolutely needs to continue losing weight. Even if her calorie count is tiny, the ED brain gets angry. When the number on the scale goes up by even one pound, the ED brain tells her she is a failure, and is only happy when the number decreases. The person writes:

Then my little bit of sanity I have left sees the real me in the mirror and thinks I look disgusting… That this is the one body I’ll ever get and I’m ruining it… Also stop losing before I get put in forced recovery.

“Dark Seas” contributes information about how prickly and defensive her ED brain is, because when someone advises her not to vomit, or offers some other helpful advice, the ED brain hisses, “Of course they’d say that, because they don’t want me to be skinny.” So even a helpfully-intended intervention is received as an insult and a challenge.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Refeeding at Home,” EdSupportForum.com, 05/22/24
Source: “How to avoid/lessen binging,” EdSupportForum.com, 01/25/24
Source: “ed brain vs rational mind,” EdSupportForum.com, 06/11/22
Source: “ED Brain,” EdSupportForum.com, 03/08/22
Image by Edvard Munch/CC BY 4.0 rawpixel.com

The Lasting Impact of Early-Life Responsive Parenting on Childhood Weight

Childhood obesity remains a pressing public health issue in the United States, with over 22% of children between the ages of six and 19 classified as obese. While diet and exercise are often the focal points of obesity prevention efforts, a new study from the Penn State College of Medicine and the Center for Childhood Obesity Research at Penn State University suggests that responsive parenting during early childhood could play a critical role in shaping long-term weight outcomes.

Insights from the INSIGHT study

The research, part of the ongoing INSIGHT study, explored the effects of early-life parenting interventions on childhood weight. The study followed two groups of first-time mothers and their children from birth through age nine. One group received training on responsive parenting practices, which encouraged mothers to attune to their child’s emotional and physical needs, particularly in areas such as feeding, sleep, play, and emotional regulation. The control group, by contrast, received education on household hazard prevention.

Published in JAMA Pediatrics on March 10, 2025, the study builds upon previous findings that demonstrated a positive impact of responsive parenting on children’s weight through age three. The latest results show that children whose mothers received responsive parenting education had lower average body mass index (BMI) levels through middle childhood compared to their peers in the control group. Notably, the effects were more pronounced among female participants, indicating that this approach may be particularly beneficial for young girls.

The challenges of sustaining early gains

Despite the promising early outcomes, the study revealed that the benefits of responsive parenting interventions diminished over time, with BMI differences fading by age nine. Dr. Ian Paul, principal investigator and University Professor of Pediatrics at the Penn State College of Medicine, emphasized that while the intervention had a meaningful early impact, sustaining these effects in an environment that promotes unhealthy weight gain remains a challenge.

He said:

Our intervention stopped when the participating children were 2 years old and focused on the parenting of young children rather than behaviors and risk factors that emerge among school-aged children… While we are delighted that we made an impact early on, the fact that the beneficial effects disappeared by age 9 is not surprising, given the obesogenic environment we live in.

Dr. Jennifer Savage, another principal investigator and Director of Penn State’s Center for Childhood Obesity Research, echoed this sentiment, highlighting the importance of ongoing support for families beyond early childhood.

A call for a life-course approach

The study’s findings reinforce the notion that diet and exercise alone are not enough to combat childhood obesity. Instead, responsive parenting practices may help establish healthy growth patterns that reduce the risk of obesity as children grow. However, to sustain these benefits, researchers advocate for a broader, life-course approach that includes continued support for healthy habits throughout childhood and adolescence.

By integrating responsive parenting strategies into early childhood care and complementing them with ongoing reinforcement, healthcare providers, educators, and policymakers can help foster healthier futures for children. As this research suggests, equipping parents with the tools to respond to their child’s developmental needs may be an essential component of long-term obesity prevention efforts.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Early-life responsive parenting intervention yields lasting but diminishing benefits on child weight,” Penn State Health News, 3/10/25
Source: “Long-Term Effects of a Responsive Parenting Intervention on Child Weight Outcomes Through Age 9 Years,” JAMA Pediatrics, 3/10/25
“Effect of a Responsive Parenting Educational Intervention on Childhood Weight Outcomes at 3 Years of Age: The INSIGHT Randomized Clinical Trial,” PubMed, 8/7/18
Image by Vanessa Loring/Pexels

Oprah Through the Years, Part 21

Courtesy of the Oprah Winfrey Network, March of 2011 brought the TV audience a new reality show, “Addicted to Food.” It was recorded on location at the Shades of Hope Treatment Center, a facility specializing in eating disorders and addiction. Shades of Hope founder and CEO Tennie McCarty has found that addicts come from homes affected by dysfunction, abuse, addiction, or some combination of all three. The work that must be done is “to delve deep within and confront not only the outward behaviors of addiction, but also the secrets, pain, self-loathing, and blame that lie beneath.”

How long does that take? At minimum, 42 days, which is the length of the Intensive Residential Program. This has been shown to be enough time to dig into the psychological issues, learn the tools of recovery, and achieve a solid state of abstinence. The process is not easy, and the rules are strict, for good reason. No alcohol, no smoking, no other types of addictive substances are allowed, because to run a program meant to end one sort of addiction while allowing other addictive substance to be used is just plain silly.

While a client’s weight may be tracked, it is not revealed. The point is to get away from the idea that “it is always about the numbers and the connection of worth/control/success to the number on the scale.”

And that’s not all…

Oh — and no TV, or books or magazines are allowed either, because people need to be thinking about their own issues, not about the larger world or some imaginary characters. McCarty explains that the goal is to allow all the negative feelings to emerge and “slap the client in the face.” Hopefully, that blow will metaphorically knock the mask right off, exposing the anger and all the other stuff. When this happens, the client is said to be “showing up.”

The Intensive period includes Family Week, and then another week in which to process whatever transpired during that time, and to figure out what’s next — which might be a transitional period, either still at the Shades of Hope, or at another facility. Or perhaps it is time to return home, and get back to school, work, or whatever.

But… and this is a big but…

None of these stages can be regarded as an end point, because this is not a race where a person breaks through a ribbon at the end of the course. Nope, says McCarty. It’s all about a lifelong commitment, during which the individual must be constantly on guard because that inner void still cries out to be filled, and “switching” addictions is definitely a real possibility, to be avoided at all costs. Day by day and minute by minute, the commitment — to use new attitudes and new tools to change old patterns — must be scrupulously kept.

McCarty offers five helpful “tips” for recovery, more thoroughly described on her page, and worth looking into:

1. Be conscious of what you eat.
2. Eat with intention.
3. Maintain a healthy meal plan.
4. Eat by the clock.
5. Recovery is not a diet, but a way of life.

The show made at this “extremely difficult rehab center” involved eight clients, and it must have been edifying for Oprah to recognize which one (or ones) she most closely identified with. Seven years later, InTouchWeekly.com made an attempt to follow up on the participants, which proved to be rather half-hearted and largely unsuccessful. But their website also contains the trailer for the original show, which is pretty interesting. SocialWorkersSpeak.org also took note of the series and made some comments.

In the next chapter of Oprah Winfrey’s life of up-and-down weight shifts, we will see things take off in a whole different direction.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Addicted to Food Q&A: Tennie McCarty and Tough Love,” Oprah.com Source: “Remember Oprah’s Reality Show ‘Addicted to Food’? Here’s What the Cast Is up to in 2018,” InTouchWeekly.com, 03/01/18
Source: “Oprah Winfrey Network’s ‘Addicted to Food’ Tackles Emotions Behind Eating Disorders,” SocialWorkersSpeak.org, 05/12/11
Image by Pat Hartman

Oprah Through the Years, Part 20

We left off last time by mentioning how the rules change. This is one of life’s little jokes. As soon as you get used to one condition or set of circumstances, it will probably be necessary, before too long, to readjust to something else. For humans, the primary survival trait is adaptability, and the young are better at it. This is one reason why, when correctly applied, being like a little child is a very desirable state.

Youth is when many people are easily able to swallow and assimilate anything without suffering a physical penalty. As the body ages, it becomes less tolerant and… the rules change. When something else is going on at the same time, this fact might be easy to ignore. In the case of Oprah Winfrey, trainer and friend Bob Greene pointed out that her thyroid issue was an easy excuse to fall back on, and that she had “absolutely” done so on more than one occasion.

People are usually pretty good at generating excuses for not achieving their dreams. Just like a regular human, the global influencer and star had a particular and individual issue to deal with. In her case, it was a medical condition that required expert management, as well as patient compliance.

At the same time, like billions of regular people, Oprah was getting older every minute. As time goes on, and even with dedicated effort, it becomes more and more difficult to stave off weight gain.

In human history, this has rarely been the case. For obesity to become a significant problem, a society has to reach the stage of having food surplus to its needs. The civilization advances to where it can afford to have some members unable to defend themselves, and dependent on others for their continued well-being. When the society has abundant food, and physical fitness is not a priority requirement, people can become obese.

The Bob Greene worldview

Greene theorized that no one, be they an anonymous teenager or a world-famous star, would ever be able to completely overcome food addiction; that the problem would never completely disappear, and would always need conscious and diligent management. He also suggested that no one could properly start the recovery journey without squarely facing five crucial questions:

What are you hungry for?
Why are you overweight?
Why have you been unable to maintain weight loss in the past?
What in your life is not working?
Why do you want to lose weight?

The last query is a particular challenge, because the seeker is quite likely to come up with the wrong answer. “Then I’ll be happy” is not the right one, because it encompasses only two possible outcomes, neither of which can satisfy, as Greene explains:

You never reach that size or weight and you’re never happy. And even worse, you reach that size and weight and realize it has nothing to do with your happiness.

The following year, 2010, was when Oprah famously stated for publication that she was not fond of the term “food addict,” but…

I realize that I really have been one. And believe me, I — like so many of you — have punished myself for that. But I know that I’m not alone, and I know that the battle hasn’t ended.

This admission seems to cover two bases: First, it pleads guilty to the same fat-hate that dwells in the heart of even the most compassionate person. Also, it appears to confirm that the last person anyone is ever able to forgive is their own self.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Oprah’s Weight Loss Confession,” Oprah.com, undated
Image by Oprah.com/Fair Use

FDA Ends Compounding for Popular GLP-1 Drugs

 

Due to limited availability and high costs, many Americans have turned to compounding pharmacies for weight-loss medications. However, this alternative will soon be unavailable.

Federal regulations allow compounding pharmacies to produce copies of drugs during shortages. Recently, though (as it’s been widely reported) regulators declared that popular weight-loss drugs Wegovy and Zepbound are no longer in short supply. As a result, consumers who have relied on less expensive, compounded versions — often obtained through telehealth services or medical spas — will need to find other options.

This has left patients like Amanda Bonello, a mother of three from Marion, Iowa, feeling anxious. She has been using a compounded version of tirzepatide, the active ingredient in Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro (for diabetes) and Zepbound (for weight loss). With Zepbound’s retail price averaging nearly $1,300/month, Bonello fears she won’t be able to afford the brand-name drug.

She said,

It feels like we’re stranded while Big Pharma controls the only food supply, letting those who can’t pay go without.

In response, industry groups representing compounding pharmacies and suppliers have filed lawsuits to continue selling these medications. Meanwhile, patients have launched an online petition urging regulators to extend the use of compounded GLP-1 drugs, approve generic alternatives, or push pharmaceutical companies to lower prices. The petition also calls for health insurers to cover these medications.

What’s the status of compounded Wegovy and Zepbound?

Soon, compounding pharmacies will no longer be permitted to produce and sell these weight-loss drugs for widespread use. The government has set a transition period, with compounded versions of Zepbound and Mounjaro already being phased out. Compounded semaglutide (found in Wegovy and Ozempic) will remain available for a short time longer.

In December, the FDA announced that tirzepatide was no longer in shortage, giving pharmacies until February 18 to stop compounding, distributing, or dispensing the drug. Suppliers selling bulk batches have until March 19 to cease distribution. The Outsourcing Facilities Association, an industry trade group, has sued the FDA in Texas to delay enforcement of these restrictions.

In response, the FDA has asked the court to deny the request, arguing that upholding its decision would protect patients and align with Congress’ goal of encouraging drug development while permitting compounding only in temporary shortages.

Last month, the FDA also determined that Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide supply had stabilized. Pharmacies must stop selling compounded semaglutide by April 22, while suppliers must halt distribution by May 22.

What should patients who take compounded weight-loss drugs expect?

Pharmacists supplying compounded weight-loss and diabetes drugs are already informing customers about the upcoming changes. Some have stopped refilling prescriptions, while others are hesitant to start new patients on compounded versions, knowing they will soon need to switch to the brand-name medications.

A study found that within a year of stopping semaglutide, a group of 327 patients from the U.S., Europe, and Japan regained two-thirds of the weight they had lost while on the drug. The study also reported a decline in their overall health.

Jennifer Burch, an independent compounding pharmacist in North Carolina, educates her patients about how compounded drugs are only available when the FDA deems the brand-name versions to be in shortage.

She frequently hears from people interested in starting on compounded tirzepatide. But with the shortage ending, she advises against it if they cannot afford the brand-name medication long-term.

She said:

We want to be upfront with them… We don’t want them to feel abandoned.

Some patients are asking doctors for long-term prescriptions to stockpile the medication for up to a year. However, doctors are reluctant, as they need to monitor patients’ weight loss and overall health.

Burch said:

I had a provider tell me yesterday, ‘I’m worried about writing a 12-month prescription. What if the patient comes back weighing 100 pounds? That’s not the goal.

Are efforts being made to lower brand-name weight-loss drug prices?

Most major employers and private insurers cover diabetes medications like Ozempic and Mounjaro. However, fewer than half of large employers cover GLP-1 medications for obesity. As a result, many patients must pay out of pocket for drugs that can cost about $1,300 per month before discounts.

Congress has scrutinized pharmaceutical companies over the high costs of these drugs, prompting some manufacturers to introduce discounted options.

Eli Lilly reduces price for Zepbound

As was reported by major media outlets, including Reuters, Eli Lilly reduced the cash price for lower-dosage vials of Zepbound through its LillyDirect website. A one-month supply of 2.5 mg now costs $349, while the 5 mg version is priced at $499. Higher dosages (7.5 mg and 10 mg) are now $599 and $699 per month, respectively, with an initial discount to $499 for the first fill and refills within 45 days.

Meanwhile, legal battles over the FDA’s decision continue. The Outsourcing Facilities Association recently sued the agency again, challenging the determination that Wegovy and Ozempic are no longer in shortage. The group had previously sued over the ruling on tirzepatide.

In the tirzepatide lawsuit, the OFA argued that the FDA’s decision effectively created a new rule without proper regulatory procedures. The court has not yet issued a ruling, and the FDA has stated it will hold off enforcing the February 18 deadline until the court decides.

For Bonello, the FDA’s declaration means she must now explore other options. Initially, she had hoped to switch to compounded semaglutide, but she realizes that’s only a temporary fix.

Her employer-sponsored insurance covers GLP-1 medications for diabetes but not for weight loss. Since she doesn’t have diabetes — though her blood sugar is elevated, and her family has a history of the disease — she isn’t eligible for coverage.

Even with Eli Lilly’s discounted $499 price for higher dosages, Bonello says she still can’t afford it while covering her other expenses.

“That’s more than my phone bill and car insurance combined,” she said.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “These discounted versions of popular weight-loss drugs are going away: What to know,” USA TODAY, 3/2/25
Source: “Lilly offers weight-loss drugs in vials at a discount to fight competition,” Reuters, 2/25/25
Image by Anna Shvets/Pexels

Oprah Through the Years, Part 19

As we learned, during a decade or so of time the weight issue was not a major problem for Oprah. She had found a large amount of inner peace in not hating any part of herself, not even the pockets of cellulite. But old mental habits die hard, and there are contradictions involved in embracing the self, no matter how calorically challenged, while also carrying out public activities (on national television, for instance) that might be regarded by the cynically minded as the very embodiment of fat-hate.

Imagine this scenario: The problem you overcame, and so triumphantly buried with a great deal of ceremony (and publicity), has clawed its way out of the grave, hitched a ride on a garbage truck, and is now demolishing your front door. What could be more disheartening? Oprah Winfrey, after a lot of emotional ups and downs, had reached a pretty good emotional equilibrium and, if there was any justice, ought to have been able to coast.

Instead, after being advised to “learn to embrace hunger,” she gradually gained back 40 pounds. Some of the difficulty was simply due to nature taking its course. As a human body ages, multiple processes are responsible for making it less resilient. It does not mend itself like it used to, and pain occurs in parts you never even knew you had. The entire organism might suddenly begin to demonstrate an uncanny propensity to grow.

O, the publication

At the beginning of 2009, the cover of Oprah’s very own slick magazine showed her current self next to an earlier, much slimmer version, and the words “How did I let this happen again?”… all of which looked like a pretty clear case of fat-hate. The inside pages held her musings on that subject, including a strong suspicion that the ultimate cause was a life out of balance, “with too much work and not enough play, not enough time to calm down… I let the well run dry.”

The conclusion seemed to point in a productive direction:

I don’t have a weight problem — I have a self-care problem that manifests through weight.

In that same year, a segment of the immensely popular “The Oprah Winfrey Show” featured 16 teens participating in “a grueling eight-hour intervention where they confront the reasons why they’re overweight.” Author Natalie Flynn described it as “humanizing” and as a way for booth the participants and the audience to grasp “what living with obesity truly entails.”

A recent Salon.com article looked back over that time with a congratulatory pronouncement:

[W]hat Winfrey has largely consistently managed to get right is her approach to childhood obesity. In her recent special and in old episodes […] Winfrey allows children to speak candidly about their weight, often showing in raw detail how obesity takes a toll on them mentally, socially and physically.

Cynics might have identified it as just another, though perhaps superficially compassionate, demonstration of how obsessed society is with maintaining a standard of fat-hate, while at the same time blaming the victims for “abusing food.” That in itself is a tricky phrase, which could logically encompass chaining up food in a basement and striking it with a belt.

Meanwhile, Bob Greene was also in the public eye, providing for the official website “Oprah’s Weight Loss Confession.” Some of the problems in the media star’s case, not relevant to most teenagers, were the concurrent challenges presented by worldwide success. Oprah had met and overcome so many obstacles, he theorized, that it was difficult for her to grasp the inevitable challenge of aging, which means “the rules change.”

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “The Highs and Lows of Oprah Winfrey’s 50-Year Weight Loss Journey,” EOnline.com, 03/24/24
Source: “On abandoning ‘fattertainment’: Why the way we talk about childhood obesity matters,” Salon.com, 03/22/24
Source: “Oprah’s Weight Loss Confession,” Oprah.com, 01/05/09
Image by aphrodite-in-nyc/Attribution 2.0 Generic

Oprah Through the Years, Part 18

We have discussed the concept of displacement and its various manifestations. In the most primitive sense, displacement is an escape valve for the mental energy generated by a threatening situation. In the most elemental case, the choices might be limited to “fight” or “flight.”

In the simplest terms, someone with a threatening food addiction might opt to fight, by getting into a program of some kind; or to flee by ignoring the threat and by putting all that mental energy into (for instance) online gaming, a very sedentary occupation that offers a lot of opportunity for snacking.

But we humans are more complicated than that, and sometimes our wires get crossed. A previous post offered the example of the so-called “fitness freak,” who trades in their doughnut habit for an obsession with working out, losing fat, and gaining muscle — to a degree that bystanders might call obsessive. But as long as a displacement activity keeps the person away from their drug of choice, while at the same time doing no harm, and while actually achieving good results, why not just accept it and move on?

The fly in the ointment

For Oprah Winfrey, however, no amount of activity could displace her craving for bread and potatoes and a whole lot of other edibles. For decades, she was a whirlwind of energy, constantly involved with professional obligations and thoroughly invested in charitable efforts.

Going back to the most elementary definition of displacement behavior, she focused on helping people flee or fight; to escape or defeat obesity. One of her 1995 TV episodes on “fattertainment” was optimistically described like this: “By providing solutions, rather than showcasing problems, the show hopes to use the power of broadcasting in a positive manner.”

Three young girls had written to the host about their uncomfortable feelings and experiences around excess weight. Oprah’s crews filmed their families and the girls and their mothers appeared on the show to talk about the “emotional roadblocks” that contribute to obesity among the young.

On the personal level

In 1995, at age 47, Oprah started to work with trainer Bob Greene, because like any sane person, she realized that having an intellectual realization is not the same thing as living the newly revealed truth. Still, it took a few more years and some unnerving heart palpitations to really jolt her into high gear. Eventually, it occurred her that “taking care of my heart, the life force of my body, had never been my priority” — and then proceeded to organize life differently with an eye toward shrinking the influence of the three ominous O’s — “Overeating. Overstressing. Overdoing.”

Furthermore — and this appears to be a vital element of the whole equation — to quote Oprah, “I no longer hated any part of myself, including the cellulite.” Ten years later, the cover of O magazine feature a toned 160-pound Oprah. By this time, she thought the actual battle with excess weight had been won. Looking back later, she said,

I’d conquered it. I was so sure, I was even cocky. I had the nerve to say to friends who were struggling, ‘All you have to do is work out harder and eat less! Get your 10,000 steps in! None of that starchy stuff!’

Not long afterwards, puzzled medical professionals diagnosed her first with hyperthyroidism, then with hypothyroidism, and what with one thing and another, exercise began to seem less of a priority, and she was warned by a doctor that it would be necessary to “learn to embrace hunger,” which she was in no way prepared to do.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “On abandoning ‘fattertainment’: Why the way we talk about childhood obesity matters,” Salon.com, 03/22/24
Source: “Making Peace With My Body,” Oprah.com, 08/01/02
Source: “The Highs and Lows of Oprah Winfrey’s 50-Year Weight Loss Journey,” MSN.com, 03/24/24
Image by aphrodite-in-nyc/Attribution 2.0 Generic

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources