More on Ecological Momentary Assessment

field-notes

The most recent Childhood Obesity News post, “Ecological Momentary Assessment and Teens,” noted that Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) works effectively in combination with technological data-gathering devices. When researchers are able to capture 81% of the expected survey data from adolescent subjects, it is considered satisfactory.

Let’s look at another study, this one concerned with the compliance rate to EMA among 461 teenagers who had ever smoked cigarettes at all. Also investigated were several covariates “including gender, race, smoking rate, alcohol use, psychological symptomatology, home composition, mood, social context, time in study, inter-prompt interval, and location.”

What might be problematic is, the information about most of those variables is the product of self-reporting. Realistically, any teen in the survey could spin tall tales, and even lie about whether they had ever smoked or not. It seems as if the biggest question was:

To date, there has been little detailed research into the predictors of EMA compliance. However, patterns or predictors of compliance may affect key relationships under investigation and introduce sources of bias in results.

There is good reason for concern. A study using the EMA/wearable technology combo may seem to be rife with objective facts, but that is not true to the extent accepted by some practitioners. At any rate, this study found EMA protocols are less likely to be complied with by boys who smoke and drink and have bad attitudes.

One school of thought holds that any data that is the product of self-reporting should be disregarded. Nevertheless, EMA is showing up a lot in the domains of rehabilitation, sport science, and behavioral medicine.

A recent meta-study on using EMA to evaluate current physical activity (PA) included children, adolescents, and adults, and even encompassed one study of elder activity. Trouble is taken to define such terms as “physical activity,” “exercise,” and “sedentary behavior,” which helps to ensure that all debate participants are on the same page, as it were. This is actually encouraging, because it often seems that opposing parties in an argument are not even talking about the same subject.

The objective was to discover whether EMA “fulfills the criteria of validity, reliability, objectivity, norms, and standardization applied to the tools used for the evaluation of physical activity.” The researchers arrived at these conclusions:

Ecological momentary assessment is a valid, reliable, and feasible approach to evaluate activity and sedentary behavior. Researchers should be aware that while ecological momentary assessment offers many benefits, it simultaneously imposes many limitations which should be considered when studying physical activity.

This article goes into a great deal of detail about methodology, hardware, software, and planning. One disadvantage of EMA is that it requires active participation and is considered “a more burdening and time-consuming approach for participants in comparison with retrospective methods.” Usually, a retrospective method requires only a reporting session at the end of the day. Another drawback is, as mentioned, the need to bring all participants into alignment in regard to the definitions of terms.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Factors predicting compliance to ecological momentary assessment among adolescent smokers,” NIH.gov, 10/04/13
Source: “Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Evaluate Current Physical Activity,” NIH.com, 07/14/14
Photo via Visualhunt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources