Atypical Antipsychotics and Childhood Obesity

Pills

There are disquieting hints everywhere that if we really were honest about discovering the causes of childhood obesity, we might not be happy about the answers. We might wish we had never asked. For example, some people believe our entire culture is warped by massive overdiagnosis of pathological conditions. We have discussed the question of whether food addiction should be defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

In a way, this could be a good thing for obese children who are blamed for being lazy, stupid, or greedy. Their problem would be reframed as a disease, like alcoholism or drug addiction, for which they need treatment, and ultimately hold no more stigma than a broken arm. The definition of food addiction as a legitimate medical condition might even mean that some kids’ treatment would be covered, if their parents are insured. But it could also lead to even more problems. How?

In Wired magazine, Gary Greenberg recently looked at what he sees as an example of that very process, through which a change in the DSM definitions led to unforeseen consequences. Upon publication of the most recent edition (DSM-IV), America suddenly and startlingly became full of bipolar children.

Greenberg says,

Within a dozen years, bipolar diagnoses among children had increased 40-fold. Many of these kids were put on antipsychotic drugs, whose effects on the developing brain are poorly understood but which are known to cause obesity and diabetes.

In other words, solving one problem led directly to another problem: kids on drugs, drugs that further research has shown to make them fat and diabetic. Greenberg is not alone in thinking that legal pharmaceutical drugs can be potentially as harmful to children as illegal street drugs. He also takes a swipe at the officially fuzzy definition of “metabolic syndrome,” pointing out that such a disease is basically a statistical construct, defined by a committee of humans who have agreed to lay out the parameters of its symptoms.

Greenberg says,

To harness the power of medicine in service of kids with hallucinations, or compulsive overeaters, or 8-year-olds who throw frequent tantrums, is to command attention and resources for suffering that is undeniable. But it is also to increase psychiatry’s intrusion into everyday life, even as it gives us tidy names for our eternally messy problems.

There is a class of drugs called atypical antipsychotics, also known as second-generation antipsychotics, prescribed to tranquilize the patient. They are thought by some to be better than first-generation antipsychotics, because of causing fewer side effects, especially fewer movement disorders, also known as uncontrollable Parkinson-like symptoms, in the users. It all has to do with dopamine and serotonin, and insulin sensitivity and resistance, but, basically, nobody really knows how the drugs work. As Wikipedia eloquently phrases it,

The mechanism of action of these agents is unknown…

That alone is enough to make a person say, “Whoa, let’s not take anything for granted about these substances.” Sometimes the stuff we take to make us better makes us worse in other ways. In other words, unintended consequences are rampant in the world, especially the world of pharmacology. The debate over a possible relationship between antipsychotic drugs and obesity is just getting warmed up.

Last spring, David Gutierrez explored the topic for Natural News. He says the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved some atypical antipsychotics for kids between 13 and 17, to treat bipolar disorder, autism, and schizophrenia. And then, at that point, had started to investigate whether they are “more likely to produce abnormal weight gain and diabetes in children than in adults.”

Gutierrez writes,

A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that children and adolescents taking atypical antipsychotics added between 8 and 15 percent to their body mass in only 11 weeks, which was sufficient for many of them to become overweight or obese.

There is little doubt that atypical antipsychotics cause weight gain and change the metabolism in ways that may lead to diabetes. This suggests that we need some better ways to help people in mental and emotional distress. Pharmaceuticals can be miraculous lifesavers, but they are not universally appropriate.

Sometimes a good after-school enrichment program can make all the difference. And yes, there are children who are incapable of appreciating an after-school program unless they’ve had their medication. But probably not as many as anyone thinks.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness,Wired, 12/27/10
Source: “FDA to probe risk of weight gain in kids using antipsychotic drugs,” Natural News, 04/28/10
Image by downing.amanda, used under its Creative Commons license.

Comments

  1. Marie Gage says:

    Yet another reason that drugs are not always a good solution for a child’s problem. It seems to me that more and more pediatricians seem to easily hand out prescriptions without really evaluating the true extent of the child’s problem, as reported by the parent. Perhaps I am not qualified to make these assumptions, but I have had experiences where it was really the problem of bad parenting, not a mental disease that the child had. However, as insurance companies are reticent to pay for counseling, finding drugs a cheaper option, I expect the trend to medicate our youth will continue. Great article as always.

  2. This suggests that we need some better ways to help people in mental and emotional distress. Pharmaceuticals can be miraculous lifesavers, but they are not universally appropriate.—

    I cannot stand the pill culture. So many people are ready to put their children on medications, rather than do the work themselves. Or even to avoid dealing with the children all together. That’s what the school was claiming about my FIVE YEAR old—that maybe the reason he has so many tantrums is he is bipolar. I do NOT believe that is a proper diagnosis for someone so young unless there is disruption beyond the normal i.e. he’s killing animals or he’s stabbing other children with scissors. Get what I mean?

    ADD, ADHD, Bipolar, ODD, OCD, Reactive Attachment Disorder—it has to stop. Yes, I am one that believes children (and adults as well but, definitely children) are “over-diagnosed” because what else is there to do than to simply say to a patient (and quite possibly lose their money and patronage): This is normal. Here are some suggestions on how to help cope with the behavior and to change the behavior. And here are some spa tickets. Go get some R&R.

    Because people want a badge of some kind. And having a prescription for your child can be just that. And yeah, if your kid isn’t doing the normal things, perhaps they are just different. Maybe they aren’t outgoing and you are forcing them to be. Whatever.

    There are better ways of helping children, and helping people raise and cope with children. They just have to be willing to do them, willing to work, willing–period.

Leave a Reply

Childhood Obesity News | OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say | Dr. Robert A. Pretlow
Copyright © 2014 eHealth International. All Rights Reserved.