Study Finds That Weight Loss Drugs Reduce Alcohol Craving

A recent study found that many people using medications for obesity, such as Mounjaro or Wegovy, report a decreased enjoyment of alcohol.

The study, which surveyed WeightWatchers members on obesity medications, found that around half of those who previously drank alcohol reduced their consumption after starting the medication. As was reported by NPR, Tamara Hall, 45, a mother of three, is one such example. She began using Mounjaro in 2023 as part of a WeightWatchers program to manage her obesity and elevated blood sugar. Hall has since lost over 100 pounds, and although she was never a heavy drinker, she now consumes significantly less alcohol.

Hall, whose blood sugar levels have improved, was a moderate drinker who previously enjoyed wine or cocktails at social events. Hall found that her tolerance for alcohol dramatically decreased after starting the medication. One drink would make her feel full and dizzy, an effect she hadn’t experienced before. As a result, cutting back on alcohol was easy.

She said:

I feel amazing… It’s life-changing… I didn’t know it would have this effect — I just don’t crave alcohol anymore, and that’s a huge benefit.

The findings align with a new study published in JAMA Network Open. The study, “Alcohol Use and Antiobesity Medication Treatment,” explored the impact of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) on alcohol use among people in the WeightWatchers telehealth weight management program (January 2022–November 2023). As reported by Medical Xpress, participants had a mean age of 43 and were primarily female (86%). They were prescribed various AOMs, including GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide), metformin, and bupropion/naltrexone (Contrave).

Of the 7,491 participants who used alcohol at baseline, 45.3% reduced their consumption, while 52.4% showed no change, and 2.3% increased their intake. Those with higher obesity levels and baseline alcohol use were more likely to reduce alcohol consumption. Notably, those taking bupropion and naltrexone had the greatest reduction in alcohol use, likely due to naltrexone’s ability to reduce cravings and rewarding effects, though this effect seemed tied to weight loss rather than the medication itself.

When adjusting for weight loss, the effect of bupropion and naltrexone disappeared, suggesting weight loss as a key factor in alcohol reduction. If AOMs reduce alcohol use through weight loss (e.g., via GLP-1 RAs), adjusting for weight loss might obscure the true contribution of the medications.

Interestingly, the reduction in alcohol consumption was observed across both newer obesity medications like Mounjaro and older drugs like metformin. “What surprised me was that alcohol consumption decreased among people using all types of anti-obesity medications,” says study author Lisa Matero, a health psychologist at Henry Ford Health. One possible explanation is that being part of a weight management program could encourage overall healthier behavior changes.

The study’s results add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that GLP-1 drugs, such as Mounjaro, have wide-ranging effects on behavior. Clinical trials of these medications have shown that participants report changes in their habits, such as drinking less or shopping less. Dr. Robert Kushner, a researcher at Northwestern University, explains that these drugs influence both appetite and the brain’s reward system, which may explain why many people also experience reduced cravings for alcohol.

While research on the topic continues, the findings highlight the potential of weight-loss medications not only for weight management but also for altering lifestyle habits like alcohol consumption. This comes at a time when there’s growing cultural awareness around the benefits of reducing alcohol intake for overall health and wellness.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Dizzy after one drink? Social drinkers on obesity drugs lose the taste for alcohol,” NPR, 12/2/24
Source: “WeightWatchers combined with weight loss medications may alter alcohol consumption, study finds,” Medical XPress, 12/1/24
Image by Heshan Perera on Unsplash

Weight-Loss Drugs and Human Subjects

In regard to GLP-1 RA drugs, a previous post asked a lot of questions about which questions most urgently need to be asked. That was only a few months ago, and maybe nothing major has happened, but the briefest web search assures us that plenty of people are working on it, and coming up with some startling possibilities.

The type of long-term research needed to settle all the questions must, obviously and unfortunately, be carried out over the long term — and by looking at the case files of many thousands of patients. Depending on variables, it must in some instances be extremely difficult for researchers to keep track of so many facts about so many people, over a span of years.

It may happen that some of the people under scrutiny develop conditions that take them outside the predetermined research parameters. They get pregnant, or move halfway around the world. Communication becomes difficult, or they just get tired of being totally conscious of and recording every detail of their existence.

Subjects may develop a reluctance to overshare, which morphs into an intense craving for privacy, especially if they are children entering adolescence, or teenagers turning into adults. Any individual might fall into a delusional wish to make the scientists happy; or feel the need, for whatever reason, to be less than honest with them.

You lookin’ at me?

When a subject is recruited, the research concerns literally every cell of their body. Tracking what they put into it and what comes out of it, is only the start. To live under a microscope can be taxing in ways that the subjects did not anticipate. Under those circumstances, some folks get antsy. They can fall into, or away from, religious or political convictions, or be caught up in an unhealthy emotional relationship, or be influenced by an individual who exerts control. They might be drafted into military service. In the worst case, some subjects die.

Over the long months that such observations should be expected to take, even the experience of mental or emotional growth could shake a person loose and make them unable to tolerate their participation for one more day. Just as some citizens will go to great lengths to avoid jury duty, a person who is really fed up with being part of an experiment will find a way out.

Ideally, a significant long-term study encompasses a very large number of participants. They might need to give up many informational tidbits, starting with simple ones like, “How much did your mother weigh when you were conceived?” and, “Now, 30 or 50 years later, how much do you weigh?” But gathering basic data is only the beginning.

Academia = intellectual rigor in lab coats

It all becomes fiendishly complicated, with linear miles of charts and suchlike. Another layer of complexity includes underlying philosophical assumptions and aspirations. According to what standards and rules must medical research be performed? What is seen as important, and what should be treated as even more important?

One thing we discover from research is how to do better research. Does the thinking on these matters advance, or has it solidified? When researchers write up their results, can they weasel without actually telling a lie? Why would anyone do that?

For a scientific researcher or anyone else, questions should never cease. Once a large number of 20-year studies of semaglutide, for instance, have been compiled, someone will come along and say, “Not good enough. This can’t be definitively judged until more evidence comes in — like for instance, a pile of 30-year studies.”

And quite rightly. Mistakes have been made. Science does not always progress in an immaculate, untarnished linear fashion. There have been errors and oversights, and that is unlikely to change.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Image by Beckie/Attribution 2.0 Generic

Of Mice and Men and Women

Anyone in any of the health professions will necessarily be aware of, and often intensely involved with, the results of scientific studies. Systemic investigations in the hard sciences include research development, testing, and evaluation that hopefully will contribute to the general pool of knowledge for the benefit of everyone.

How often do we think about what is really behind the numerous studies that must be completed in order for a drug or other treatment to eventually become acceptable to and accessible by the general public? Observing a caged rodent is a whole different proposition from keeping tabs on a human being. What behavior of the human subject will be observed? Will they be following their natural, normal course and recording it? Or dealing with something different being done to the natural course, like taking a different medication?

Any objections?

To track the trajectory of a planet is one thing. To convince a person to, for instance, meticulously record every particle of matter that goes into them and comes out of them is a whole different situation. Even with the most cooperative subject, in the most meticulously conducted experiment, there will be times when the person just wants out.

On other occasions, it might be that the professionals doing the research will decide to end a subject’s participation. In either case, there are plenty of guidelines and multiple strict rules, declared by different agencies, concerning any possible circumstance.

For the benefit of scientists connected with the Marshfield Clinic, MarshfieldResearch.org turned its attention to research itself in a document by Lori A. Scheller titled “Withdrawal of Subjects from Research.” In some instances, the participation of a human subject consists of interaction and/or intervention with the research team.

Or, it might be that their identifiable personal information is used, whether that information consists of data only, or specimens obtained from them. A whole set of rules defines what is considered individually identifying information. This is one of the circumstances that can lead to the involvement of lawyers.

A person might discontinue participation in a research study through voluntary withdrawal, and the federal government requires that human subjects retain the right to withdraw their informed consent at any time. In other cases, the Principal Investigator (PI) might end someone’s participation, for the good of the project. Of course, in any case where the PI withdraws a subject, it is strongly urged that the reasons be explained to that individual.

To prevent trouble, regulations demand that any prospective research participant (or parent of a participating minor) must be fully informed of their rights before they sign anything. The information about withdrawal, voluntary or otherwise, includes…

[…] statements that participation in the research is voluntary, that participation may be discontinued at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, a description of any circumstances whereby an investigator may terminate a subject’s participation, consequences of withdrawal, and procedures for orderly withdrawal.

Then, there will be another whole set of rules about what happens to the data already generated by their previous involvement. For instance,

According to the guidance, a biological specimen collected but not analyzed prior to a subject’s withdrawal may not be analyzed following a subject’s complete withdrawal from a study…

The guidance states that an institution may choose to honor a subject’s request that his or her data be destroyed or excluded from further analysis at withdrawal, but only with agreement from the funding agency, and only if the research is not FDA-regulated.

Where the Food and Drug Administration is involved, however, there is a requirement for “all data collected on withdrawing subjects to remain as part of the study database or records after withdrawal.” This “ensures clinical study validity and prevents unreasonable risks to enrolled subjects, future subjects, and eventual users of marketed products”:

The FDA describes its concern that subjects who withdraw from research are more likely to have experienced adverse events or a failure of efficacy, and allowing exclusion of their data would increase the probability of introducing bias, and would negatively impact the scientific validity of the research.

What happens when a PI has to cope with a lot of the subjects quitting, or with the necessity to “withdraw” them through executive action? In that case, it might be time to fall back and regroup:

He or she should re-evaluate the protocol and determine whether changes are necessary to facilitate subject retention without weakening the scientific integrity of the research.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Withdrawal of Subjects from Research,” MarshieldResearch.org, 09/11/15
Image by Steve Jurvetson/Attribution 2.0 Generic

Experts Continue Evaluating Benefits and Risks of GLP-1 Agonists

As we know, over the past 30 years, rates of overweight and obesity in the U.S. have more than doubled, creating a growing public health crisis. Projections suggest that by 2050, 213 million adults and 43 million children will face overweight or obesity. Researchers have been emphasizing that urgent action is needed to address this issue.

A recent Medscape article looks into one promising intervention that involves glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), initially developed for diabetes and now approved for weight loss. These drugs have seen a dramatic rise in popularity, with prescriptions increasing by 132.6% from late 2022 to late 2024. Public awareness has also surged, with 32% of surveyed U.S. adults reporting familiarity with GLP-1 RAs in 2024, compared to just 19% in 2023.

GLP-1 RAs and their effectiveness

GLP-1 RAs, including tirzepatide (which targets additional receptors beyond GLP-1), have demonstrated effectiveness in weight loss. A 2022 analysis of 22 trials involving over 17,000 participants found that 50.2% achieved at least a 5% weight loss, while 17.5% experienced a ≥10% weight reduction compared to placebo. A subsequent 2023 review of 41 trials confirmed significant reductions in weight, BMI, and waist measurements.

Dr. Andres Acosta from the Mayo Clinic highlighted the long-standing use of GLP-1 RAs and the growing enthusiasm for their application in treating obesity. However, experts like Dr. Daniel Drucker from Mount Sinai Hospital caution that while these medications are highly effective, not everyone benefits. Approximately 10% of users may experience minimal weight loss or intolerable side effects.

Dr. Drucker said,

[W]e know some people don’t lose much weight when taking these medicines and others don’t feel well and can’t take them… [It’s} essential for us to identify who will be the best responders, as we do with medications for other conditions, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Understanding obesity phenotypes

Dr. Acosta’s research has identified four obesity phenotypes that can guide treatment approaches:

  • Hungry Gut (HG). Patients experience rapid gastric emptying and feel hungry shortly after meals.
  • Hungry Brain. Individuals have impaired satiety and tend to overeat during meals.
  • Emotional Hunger. Emotional or hedonic eating behaviors dominate.
  • Slow Burn. Patients have a sluggish metabolism and burn fewer calories.

 

In a study of 312 patients, those receiving phenotype-specific treatments achieved significantly greater weight loss (15.9% vs. 9.0%) after one year. Acosta’s lab has developed a genetic test to predict the best responders to GLP-1 RAs, showing promise in identifying individuals who might benefit most. It’s licensed by Dr. Acosta’s lab and available through Phenomix Sciences.

His group has also studied which lifestyle interventions are most effective for each phenotype. Dr. Acosta said,

When a unique lifestyle intervention targeting each phenotype was applied, patients lost more weight and had greater metabolic improvement.

Concerns about side effects

Despite their benefits, GLP-1 RAs carry risks. Common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, and constipation, while more serious issues like pancreatitis and gallbladder diseases have been reported. Additionally, cases of compounded GLP-1 RAs from pharmacies have been linked to fatalities. These risks emphasize the need for cautious use, especially as discontinuation rates are high due to cost (over $12,000 annually) and side effects.

Optimizing treatment

Experts like Dr. Marc-Andre Cornier stress that GLP-1 RAs should be part of a broader strategy that includes lifestyle changes, such as a high-protein diet and resistance exercise to prevent muscle loss. Furthermore, precision medicine approaches tailored to individual phenotypes may enhance treatment success and minimize trial-and-error prescribing. Recently published recommendations can help healthcare experts guide patients taking GLP-1 RAs to optimize nutrition.

Public attitudes and sustainability

Despite rising interest, a recent survey found that most Americans prefer alternative methods, such as plant-based diets, over weight-loss injections. Moreover, many discontinue GLP-1 RAs within a year, raising concerns about long-term effectiveness and potential weight cycling.

Dr. Acosta highlighted the importance of identifying ideal candidates for these medications to maximize benefits while addressing cost and insurance coverage challenges. Tailored approaches are key to ensuring sustainable, effective obesity treatment.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “As GLP-1 Use Surges, Clinicians Weigh Benefits and Risks,” Medscape, 11/22/24
Source: “Metabolic Bariatric Surgery in the Era of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity Management,” JAMA Network, 10/25/24
Source: “Reasons for discontinuation of GLP1 receptor agonists…,” Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 9/29/17
Image by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Weight-Loss Drugs on the Horizon

There are medications that a child needs in order to preserve life, improve an aspect of health, or prevent a damaging condition from occurring. With some pharmaceutical products, like for instance GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, the case is not so clear-cut, and the use of such products on children can initiate a vigorous discussion among adults.

At any rate, no one wants to see minors sticking hypodermic needles into themselves. Even adults who need to treat their type 2 diabetes would prefer not to carry out the self-injection process day after day, but they don’t have a choice.

A healthcare marketing research and business consulting firm called DelveInsight is one of several similar companies that issue annual reports on the state of the pharmaceutical arts. The typical report covers the “present clinical development scenario and growth prospects” in the specialized market of weight loss and weight management. It describes “pipeline products from the pre-clinical developmental phase to the marketed phase.” According to DelveInsight,

In the report, a detailed description of the drug is proffered including mechanism of action of the drug, clinical studies, NDA approvals (if any), and product development activities comprising the technology, Weight Loss/Weight Management (Obesity) collaborations, licensing, mergers and acquisition, funding, designations, and other product-related details.

Such a report includes all the companies in the field, along with descriptions of their various products in early-, mid-, and late-stage development. It includes information on the drug’s target receptor within the human organism, along with the route of administration, mechanism of action, molecular type, and whether it is suitable for monotherapy or combination therapy. The list of “key questions” covered by the report comprises 14 areas of inquiry. This year’s report covers more than 80 companies and 100 pipeline drugs. So there is a lot going on.

Weird and unanticipated

The human body has a vested interest in keeping unknown and potentially dangerous chemicals out of itself. Where medicine is concerned, in many cases the body can adapt, even though that might take time and entail discomfort. Science persists in trying to find ways to make ingestion work because needles are expensive, a lot of trouble to use properly and dispose of, and just generally icky.

Now let’s segue to tomorrow, and a fascinating article by Anil Oza about an amazing innovation the future might bring to the realm of drugs that require needles because the destructive nature of stomach acid precludes oral delivery. Very recently, STATNews.com reported on a device that is under development after drawing its inspiration from sea creatures. Hopefully, this item will introduce into the body drugs that formerly had to be injected either quickly by syringe or slowly via intravenous drip.

Described as blueberry-sized, it is meant to be swallowed. Also,

It then uses jets, modeled after the organs cephalopods use to propel themselves through the water and to release ink, to eject drugs into the tissue lining the digestive tract. The researchers report […] a series of experiments that serve as a proof of concept, showing that the device was more efficient at delivering drugs than other methods of delivering drugs orally.

The innovation has been tested on a pig, with GLP-1 drugs, and the outlook is promising although of course a long and complicated program of testing and more testing lies ahead. But the implications are exciting, especially if the results will make useful drugs available to children without the necessity for needles.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Obesity Pipeline Insight, 2024,” DelveInsight.com, undated
Source: “A new device for delivering drugs without needles draws inspiration from the elegant squid,” STATNews.com, 11/20/24
Image by Dawn Pedersen/Attribution 2.0 Generic

GLP-1 Drugs — Are Alternatives Feasible? (Continued)

This post is a continuation of a recent post.

A probiotic supplement may also contain golden turmeric extract (anti-inflammatory), black pepper extract (for bioavailability), sunflower lecithin, and other natural ingredients which are said to provide additional benefits. A fiber, glucomannan, helps a person to feel full, and various ingredients promote thermogenesis, or actual heat inside the body, which literally burns calories (or possibly not.)

A typical brand of natural stuff combines several ingredients and does come with the possibility of side effects which however are said to be rare. They are bloating, headache, and gut imbalance (dysbiosis), a particularly disconcerting outcome because one never knows whether to expect constipation or diarrhea, and they are pretty much the opposite phenomena.

But even if that internal chaos occurs, it is said to improve within weeks. One is tempted to ask, how many weeks? Four weeks? That would be a month, or one-12th of a year, at least. Many people prefer to remain overweight and enjoy life, instead.

A USNews.com article names seven high-satiety foods (high in fiber, healthy fats, and protein) and assures that a diet rich in them will aid in reaching weight loss goals. They are oats, barley, legumes, eggs, Greek yogurt, avocado, and fish. It goes on to say,

Foods high in protein, fiber and healthy fats can trigger the release of GLP-1 hormones and other satiety-enhancing effects… Eating more of these foods is less expensive than weight loss medications and have none of the unwanted side effects.

Even better, a piece by Joe Cannon, who for three decades has advised people about how to stoke up their own innards to manufacture their own GLP-1, names a total of 31 such foods. There are major groups, like fermented foods (yogurt, kefir and kimchi) and high-fiber foods (beans, oats, and barley), as well as resistant starch, whey protein, phytonutrients, Spinach Thylakoid Extracts, certain nuts and seeds, extra virgin olive oil, and other esoteric ingredients.

Along with the substances already mentioned, he recommends Resveratrol, glutamine, Valine, glycine, arginine, tryptophan, and more. Cannon also also warns of what to stay away from, and adds,

While going the natural route may not produce as impressive weight loss as drugs like Ozempic (semaglutide), it’s also true that it will cost less, and the risk of side effects may be lower, too.

…[T]he fact that natural therapies work is valuable knowledge to those who cannot afford these medications and who are averse to taking drugs for weight loss purposes.

A WebMD.com article by Jessica Migala adds some important information, namely that GLP-1 production is aided by exercise because it also facilitates the production of insulin, giving the body’s cells energy — and although research is not definitive, this appears to also be true for patients with type 2 diabetes. “Exactly what’s going on needs further study,” the report says.

Migala warns that natural supplements cannot achieve the same results as the drugs will. Although berberine might do something, the trials that opinion is based on have all used different doses and durations, so the overall picture is not clear. Also, it can cause the same nausea, bloating, and constipation that GLP-1 drugs are known for. She writes,

[I]t’s clear what the prescription medications are supposed to do, and at specific doses. But supplements may rely on preliminary or incomplete data, so it’s less clear what effect they will have on you.

The author warns patients to keep their physicians aware of anything they are taking, because some herbs and other remedies might interfere with or accentuate the effects of some medications. If the supplement route is chosen, it is important to try just one at a time, in order to be able to get clear answers about exactly what is working, and where the cause of any side effects can be found.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Provitalize Side Effects: What are the Side Effects of Provitalize Probiotics?,” TheBBCoo.com, undated
Source: “7 Foods that Mimic the Effects of Ozempic and Other GLP-1 Drugs,” USNews.com, 07/17/24
Source: “31 Best Foods and Supplements That Raise GLP-1 Levels,” SupplementClarity.com, 05/11/24
Source: “Can You Boost GLP-1 Naturally?,” WebMD.com, 07/26/24
Image by Michał Parzuchowski on Unsplash

What Doctors Say About Prescribing GLP-1 Receptor Agonists to Kids

Yesterday, MedPage Today published another part of its series called “Ozempic: Weighing the Risks and Benefits.” In the piece, Enterprise & Investigative Writer Sophie Putka examines how often doctors prescribe new weight loss drugs to kids and interviews a few professionals about their thinking process, reservations, and concerns.

As enthusiasm for GLP-1 receptor agonists as a weight-loss solution has grown, their use in children has also increased. Currently, liraglutide and semaglutide are the only GLP-1 drugs approved by the FDA for treating obesity in children aged 12 and older.

Between October 2022 and September 2024, prescriptions for these two medications by pediatric and adolescent medicine specialists surged from 3,448 to 24,435 — a sevenfold increase in just two years, according to a MedPage Today analysis of Symphony Health data. During this time, total prescriptions for all GLP-1 drugs written by these specialists more than doubled, rising from 59,868 to 125,538. These figures include prescriptions for 11 GLP-1 brands, many of which are approved for type 2 diabetes, but exclude those written by primary care or family medicine physicians and compounding pharmacies.

Many specialists feel cautiously comfortable prescribing GLP-1 medications to children when other options have been exhausted, provided that families are engaged in lifestyle interventions. However, concerns remain about long-term effects, particularly on bone density, and some experts remain uneasy about the rapid adoption of these drugs in pediatric care.

The jury is still deliberating

According to a recent article in Scientific American, written by Lauren J. Young, an associate editor for health and medicine, experts express concerns about potential impacts on bone health, growth, puberty, and restrictive eating habits, emphasizing the need for long-term studies like this JAMA study. These medications, considered lifelong treatments, pose unique challenges for teenagers compared to adults. Here at Childhood Obesity News, we also covered all kinds of questions and concerns regarding the potential risks of pediatric, adolescent, and adult use of GLP-1 drugs.

Still,

Clinical trials in younger age groups have shown significant weight and BMI reductions compared to lifestyle changes like diet and exercise, leading to FDA approvals of liraglutide (Saxenda) in 2020 and semaglutide (Wegovy) in 2022 for children 12 and older. A recent study reported a nearly 600% increase in GLP-1 prescriptions for adolescents and young adults between 2020 and 2023, largely driven by Wegovy’s approval for weight management in late 2022.

Proceeding with care

Last year, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued an updated Clinical Practice Guideline for recommending the use of pharmacotherapy for adolescents 12 and up, including GLP-1 agonists.

Sarah Hampl, M.D., of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and lead author of the AAP guidelines, emphasized the role of other interventions that accompany medication. She said:

It was recommended, not in isolation or not as a monotherapy, but as adjunct or addition to intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment… [AAP] needed to comment on [pharmacotherapy], because it can be a very effective form of treatment — again, as an adjunct and these kids, especially with severe obesity, they have some really serious and real comorbidities right here and now, in their childhood.

On the other hand, Dr. Fatima Cody Stanford, a pediatric obesity specialist at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, avoids prescribing GLP-1 drugs to children under 12.

She said:

I would still probably use my other drugs where we do have some data, like a topiramate or metformin, or if they have very severe obesity, I would wonder if they had something else,” such as proopiomelanocortin (POMC) deficiency or leptin receptor deficiency.

Dr. Stanford ensures her adolescent patients receive comprehensive care, including dietitian support and psychological counseling, while closely monitoring bone health given the lack of long-term data on GLP-1 use.

It looks like family medicine doctors tend to use weight-loss drugs as a last resort. Dr. Tochi Iroku-Malize, former board chair of the American Academy of Family Physicians, noted that while medications might be necessary for some children with severe obesity, their long-term effects on developing bodies remain unclear.

She said:

When we’re starting with children, they have a longer way to go than adults when it comes to using these medications… [W]e don’t yet know what the long-term effects of taking the weight-loss medications are, and whether the young patients would have to continue taking them indefinitely to maintain their weight.

Despite these challenges, experts agree on the importance of combining medication with healthy lifestyle habits, stressing that the long-term success of any treatment relies on addressing the broader environmental and behavioral factors contributing to childhood obesity.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “How Often Do Doctors Use New Weight-Loss Drugs in Kids?,” MedPage Today, 11/18/24
Source: “Teenagers Are Taking New Weight-Loss Drugs, but the Science Is Far from Settled,” Scientific American, 10/25/24
Image by Ben Wicks on Unsplash

GLP-1 Drugs — Are Alternatives Feasible?

In recent times, numerous illnesses have caused conventional medicine, and particularly the pharmaceutical industry, to be challenged by those who believe that natural substances and actions can achieve a cure. When it comes to the GLP-1 RA drugs (leaving type 2 diabetes aside, and considering only the weight-loss aspect) the case for nature has been proven in enough instances to make the idea worth considering.

A previous post asked,

What if, instead of making semaglutide universally comfortable to use, the emphasis could be on making it obsolete?

Well, first of all, many large corporations would commence to bleed from the pockets. But, leaving that aside, could dietary supplements be the answer? Would natural products work as well, only slower? Could people be convinced to try other substances instead?

Possibly they could, because apparently, GLP-1 drugs have some bad effects, and current science does not reveal how to eliminate the bad ones while keeping the good ones. Some practitioners believe that, rather than supply a GLP-1 receptor agonist, medicine’s goal should be to encourage the body to make its own GLP-1, which the expensive pharmaceutical product definitely does not. So, the market also features probiotics, which do not cause as much harm as the GLP-1 RA drugs.

What problems with Ozempic (and other semaglutide brands) have natural alternatives been found to avoid? Not surprisingly, it seems that one of the earliest to be noted was unwanted facial remodeling. As Zsa Zsa Gabor reputedly said long ago, “As a woman, you have to choose between your fanny or your face. I chose my face.”

Apparently, when weight is lost too fast, especially if it is from muscle, the metabolism may slow down and the whole hormonal system can be thrown out of sync. The immune system could be impaired, bones could become brittle, and hair could be shed. For women, any menopause-related symptoms might intensify.

Okay, so what else is there?

One suggestion is berberine:

When taken as a pill or powder, berberine enters the bloodstream and interacts with cells, influencing various biological processes. Instead of targeting a single pathway, berberine acts on multiple fronts, impacting several conditions simultaneously.

Proponents of the natural approach say that three bacterial strains (Lactobacillus gasseri, Bifidobacterium breve, and Bifidobacterium lactis) trigger the gut to release GLP-1 on its own. They also in some way make the body more responsive to the chemical, and incidentally, help prevent the leaky gut syndrome.

Endorsements from the public say that the probiotic combo helps to eliminate the craving for junk food. One enthusiast quoted in the advertising claims to have lost three inches from her stomach; another claims to have dropped three jean sizes. It is also asserted that these natural probiotics do not lead to what is called “rebound” weight, in other words gaining it all back again if the drug is discontinued.

A probiotic supplement can reportedly prevent that negative outcome, while still providing the benefits sought by Ozempic users. As always, a doctor should be consulted, especially about potential conflict with other substances, prescribed or otherwise, and it should be firmly understood that patient compliance, in the matters of dosage and timing, is paramount.

(To be continued…)

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Image by South Australian History/Public Domain

What’s Wrong With Ozempic and Its Kin?

A recent post mentioned some of the complications of using Ozempic or other brands of semaglutide, which are GLP-1 receptor agonists used to facilitate weight loss. It’s necessary to look closely at this trend for the sake of patients, who are being prescribed these drugs at ever-younger ages. We don’t want them to suffer (or hate us) 20 or 40 years from now, if their future bodies are messed up in some way that present-day science does not even suspect.

And of course, as has been widely publicized, a lot of their bodies are already messed up while using the stuff now. One big problem is that even the injectable form can cause misery in the patient’s digestive system, in addition to other difficulties. Yet, users and potential users clamor to have this medication in oral form, delivered directly to their stomach and gastrointestinal tract. (And how about the suspense of using a substance so versatile, it can bring on both constipation and diarrhea?)

In addition to possibly causing pain, nausea, and vomiting, the pills have to be swallowed on a strict daily schedule: upon awakening, with an empty stomach, and half an hour before eating a bite of food. They come with quite a few cautions and contraindications, including a list of almost 40 side effects.

The person taking oral semaglutide may have to give up alcohol and/or tobacco because of negative interactions, according to the Mayo Clinic, which also adds:

Appropriate studies have not been performed on the relationship of age to the effects of semaglutide in children. Safety and efficacy have not been established.

One foundational and undeniable fact here is that on the whole, people would rather not give themselves injections, no matter how streamlined the process. Also, there is an ecological angle. The users do not refill a single apparatus with the substance they need. The tool is not a reusable syringe. The medication arrives in individual, single-dose devices. Eons from now, there will still be millions of them in landfills, and in the oceans.

Additionally, these gadgets are costly to manufacture, forcing people to spend lavish amounts on objects destined to be thrown away. Viewed from a certain perspective, this just looks insane.

Speaking of mental health…

Everyone has heard of semaglutide’s desirable effects: decreased appetite and a feeling of fullness that lasts longer because the stomach empties slowly. But we aren’t done mentioning the undesirable effects yet. Semaglutide has some serious drawbacks that are classified as uncommon, which means it affects one person in 100; and rare, which translates to one in 1,000. These include hypoglycemia, allergic reactions, pancreatitis, stomach paralysis, and liver abnormalities.

Because of the factor called titration, which means getting just enough of the drug at just the right time, the patient has to check in with the doctor quite frequently. Most people don’t have enough money or time to spend either resource so extravagantly.

And of course, there is the expense of the substance itself. And the fact that a user’s facial appearance may change in unexpected and unwelcome ways. And it has begun to look pretty certain that they have to stay on the medication forever, or else gain the weight back.

Previous posts have mentioned how some weight-loss drugs cause depression and suicidal ideation, which is ironic, considering that many patients have been programmed to equate weight loss with ecstatic happiness, or at least with the potential to solve many life problems. Their disappointment and discouragement must in some cases be profound.

Here is a question: What if, instead of making semaglutide universally comfortable to use, the emphasis could be on making it obsolete?

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Semaglutide (oral route),” MayoClinic.org, undated
Source: “How Ozempic Works: The Science Behind the Medication,” JoinLevity.com, 06/19/24
Image by Richard Riley/Attribution 2.0 Generic

Gene Therapy for Childhood Obesity

Childhood Obesity News has been looking at various types of treatment for childhood obesity, including GLP-1 agonists, digital technology, and behavioral interventions. Now, let’s take a quick look at yet another promising treatment — gene therapy.

For the past four years, researchers at Shriners Children’s St. Louis have been exploring new methods to combat the impacts of childhood obesity. Led by Farshid Guilak, Ph.D., and Ruhang Tang, Ph.D., the research team has developed a promising approach using gene therapy. Their studies in mice have shown that this therapy can convert harmful fatty acids into beneficial ones, which may help children with obesity lower their risk of associated health problems, particularly arthritis.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, details a gene therapy technique called “fat-1 gene therapy,” which prevents metabolic dysfunction, cellular aging, and arthritis linked to obesity.

According to Dr. Guilak, excess weight is the top preventable risk factor for arthritis in children. The team’s findings highlight that it’s not only obesity itself but also the diet that contributes to arthritis risks. Specifically, the type of fatty acids children consume significantly affects their weight and health.

Dr. Tang explained that gene therapy involves using an adeno-associated virus (AAV) to introduce a gene coding for an enzyme into cells. This enzyme automatically transforms pro-inflammatory Omega-6 fatty acids into Omega-3 fatty acids, which are healthier for metabolism. Omega-3s — found in foods like fish and certain nuts — enhance metabolic health by improving insulin sensitivity, promoting fat breakdown, and reducing inflammation, potentially lowering the risk of diseases related to obesity. Natalia Harasymowicz, Ph.D., another study leader, noted that the therapy also reduces the number of inflammatory cells involved in obesity and arthritis.

The study specifically examined post-traumatic arthritis, a form common among children due to injuries such as knee meniscus tears. A single gene therapy injection was shown to significantly reduce the negative effects of a high-fat, Omega-6-heavy diet on both metabolic health and knee arthritis. The therapy also appeared to prevent early “aging” in the mice caused by diet-induced obesity.

Dr. Guilak said:

What we are observing is that obesity results in old knees in young patients… The modern diet, especially in the United States, tends to be high in Omega-6s and low in Omega-3s, which can lead to an imbalance, especially for kids… Arthritis can be a very painful and debilitating condition for children so we’re hopeful that this research will help reduce the risk of it developing and make treatments more effective. The implications for how this research might be used in the future are vast but we’re excited about the potential for it to help kids lead healthier lives.

The research team, led by Dr. Guilak, is now collaborating with the FDA, aiming to start clinical trials within the next three to five years.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Gene Therapy Method Converts Omega Fatty Acids to Combat Childhood Obesity,” Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, 10/14/24
Source: “Gene therapy for fat-1 prevents obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction, cellular senescence, and osteoarthritis,” PNAS.com, 10/14/24
Image by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources