Deep Emotions, Useful and Otherwise

Whether it is called a moral, ethical or spiritual matter, messing around with substances tends to affect our inner beings. This is where animal experimentation around the problem runs into a snag. In “Addiction: The View from Rat Park,” Prof. Bruce Alexander pointed out, as a basic premise, that rats are rats, and went on to ask,

How can we possibly reach conclusions about complex, perhaps spiritual experiences like human addiction and recovery by studying rats?

Surely, some critics must have asked him what on earth he meant by that. What does shooting up in an alley have to do with our interior spiritual selves? Only everything! Dr. Pretlow has written,

Disordered overeating and obesity in youth appears to be a psychological problem, suggestive of an addictive process. Disordered overeating and obesity should be considered an eating disorder and treated by psychologists/psychiatrists.

He is not the only expert to have noticed that in these cases, psychological factors are inevitably at work. Be that as it may, the sad state of affairs is that mental health professionals who specialize in treating obesity, whether child or adult, are rare.

An essay titled “Shame and Addiction” by an uncredited Gateway Foundation author outlines the symptoms of shame (perfectionism, low self-esteem, people-pleasing, and guilt) and also lists the beliefs that someone may be led into by a sense of shame. These include convictions that the self is bad, defective and unlovable, and a failure undeserving of happiness.

Counterproductivity

The article says that shame “can trigger a dependency on alcohol or drugs as a method of escape,” which of course is no help at all when dependency on a substance (or on behavior associated with substance use) is the underlying problem in the first place. Dr. Pretlow often speaks of vicious cycles, and this is one of them.

The article goes on to specify how the addiction recovery process is impacted by shame. The person may keep quiet and hide the truth about matters that would better be explored aloud. Shame can destroy a person’s sense of worthiness, and convince them that their dreams can never be achieved. To get better, the person needs proper guidance and a safe, supportive environment. But those side effects are the very factors that prevent so many people from seeking help.

Then, the Gateway Foundation includes instructions for healing, which can be accomplished with proper guidance in a safe and supportive environment:

Recognize shame
Face the root of your shame
Accept self
Make amends and let go
Be kind to yourself
Find a safe space
Develop a support network

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Addiction: The View from Rat Park,” BruceKAlexander.com, undated
Source: “Shame and Addiction,” GatewayFoundation.org, undated
Image by CPSU/CSA/CC BY-SA 2.0

Painful Emotions Complicate the Problem

Rightly or wrongly, moral baggage is carried (or not!) by most humans in their every interaction with the world. Many people spend their lives drowning in guilt and shame about something or other, and that is a problem in itself. Now, what about spiritual or moral qualms regarding one’s attachment to a behavior, like compulsive overeating, for instance — especially if it is identified as an addiction?

Regret is probably the mildest sort of moral reaction to one’s own actions. Dr. Pretlow and co-author Suzette Glasner, Ph.D., addressed this in “Reconceptualization of Eating Addiction and Obesity as Displacement Behavior and a Possible Treatment,” saying:

Activation of the (irrepressible) displacement mechanism may explain why individuals feel compelled to overeat or binge in the face of a rewarding cue yet feel substantial regret afterward. Regret felt by individuals after a binge episode could also be, at least in part, due to social pressure, diet culture, and potential effects on body weight. Regret would not occur if it were simply a matter of reward.

Many professionals in the field of disordered eating have remarked on these emotional quandaries. According to neuroscientist Dr. Billi Gordon, who was morbidly obese for most of his life,

Holiday binge and compulsive eating, like drug addiction, causes guilt, self-loathing, and psychological distress. There is consistent and considerable co-morbidity between compulsive overeating and substance abuse. Hence, the predisposition for compulsively overeating voluminous amounts of food, suggests an underlying neurobiological process similar to addiction.

In “The trauma behind the addiction,” counselor and therapist Sam Coleman discusses the many studies through which Adverse Childhood Experiences, or ACEs, have been linked to substance misuse in adults. For most addicts, their journey into darkness begins with the simple effort to self-medicate the bad memories out of existence. The secrecy they had to maintain throughout their childhood added an extra burden, and by the time they grow up enough to be able to reveal those dark secrets, it is of course far too late to do anything about the abuse. The person gets all wrapped up in layers of self-judgment and self-condemnation.

This category of experience, whether caused by simple violence, sexual abuse, or even sustained and inescapable emotional abuse, tends to breed in the victim a sense of shame and an inner conviction of unworthiness. They feel isolated from what they perceive as a normal society made up of people who are not haunted by such demons.

This is one reason why even the most basic forms of group therapy can be helpful, at least as a beginning step. It is often a revelation to learn that other people are coping with similar difficulties. Coleman says,

The word “addiction” derives from the Latin word which means “enslaved to”. Anybody that has suffered with addiction will fully understand this. You become a slave to the drug of your choice. It fills your thoughts and everything else fades into the background.

We will be talking more about the two emotions of guilt and shame, because people who know about these things have taken the trouble to carefully differentiate between the two. Briefly, shame is like being shackled, while guilt can actually be the key that unlocks the chains.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Reconceptualization of Eating Addiction and Obesity as Displacement Behavior and a Possible Treatment,” ScienceGate.app, 2020
Source: “Christmas Cookie Blue,” PsychologyToday.com, 12/06/13
Source: “The trauma behind the addiction,” Medium.com, 02/13/20
Image by Anthony Easton/
CC BY 2.0

Moral Factors in Addiction

How does DSM-5, the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, define addiction? In the simplified addiction criteria, there are four subheadings, one of which encompasses social problems. This includes such matters as the neglect of relationships and their ensuing responsibilities, like keeping the rent paid and taking care of the necessary life tasks at home, or in educational or employment settings. Maintaining an addiction will cause a person to give up the activities they used to care about unless purposes can be combined. A parent who can score dope at their child’s sports event has exceptional life-management skills.

Another whole category of “tells” concerns ignoring risk in the pursuit or use of the addictive substance. Getting a supply from another parent at a park is not quite the same as driving to a bad neighborhood at night to meet a stranger. This escalating behavior includes not only dicey environments but stubborn persistence in the destructive habit even though it causes obvious problems.

Similarities

It is easy to picture a heroin addict doing any of those things. But with just a bit more imagination, it is also possible to conceptualize a food addict making the same mistakes — perhaps not on such a large scale, and not with large consequences like prison — but still, life-damaging bad decisions.

Indeed the consequences may seem, to an outsider, trivial and even ridiculous. Friends make fun of each other’s eating habits, often as a caring gesture, because it is one of the few acceptable ways to address another adult’s potentially destructive habits. But to the person burdened by those habits, it is no joke. Here are some excerpts from a piece by Anita Badejo, in a series of confessional articles by people with eating disorders:

Eventually, my mom realized I was sneaking food and she started hiding sweets in the kitchen in hopes of curbing my steady weight gain. Instead, I became an expert at climbing on countertops, calculating how much I could eat of something before she would notice, and burying wrappers in the trash. Often, I’d throw away the balanced, nutritious lunches she’d pack me […] in favor of pizza and curly fries.

This was obviously someone who did not suffer from insatiable hunger, but selective hunger. Otherwise, she would have consumed both the healthful lunches and the fat-filled and fried meals. By climbing on kitchen counters, Badejo risked a fracture or a concussion. That her mother would be disappointed or angered by the lies (and the wasted good food) did not faze her. But what really caused her to focus on the idea that her behavior was not normal was the realization that “I thought more about what I’d eat when I got to my friends’ houses than the time I’d spend with them.” Then,

I hoped going to my dream college would somehow absolve me of my lack of self-worth and, with that, my eating habits. Instead, I spent much of my freshman and sophomore years […] feeling like a fraud and making full use of my unlimited meal plan by stuffing to-go containers and eating alone in my dorm room.

This was both a social problem and, in terms of health, a calculated risk. Very close to the end of her essay, the author admits,

I’ve come to realize I eat the same way I hit my snooze button every morning: just a little bit more. Tired when I should feel energized, so empty despite being so full. Food is still the first thing I think about when I wake up and the last thing I think about before I go to bed. I still spend much of my time trying to hide just how much I eat it.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “DSM-5 Criteria for Addiction Simplified,” AddictionPolicy.org, 08/20/20
Source: “I’m Mending My Broken Relationship With Food,” BuzzfeedNews.com, 02/26/15
Image by airpix/CC BY 2.0

Breastfeeding Steadily Gains Traction Against Obesity

The introduction to an online interview with Dr. Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello says,

Imagine if there were an organ in your body that weighed as much as your brain, that affected your health, your weight, and even your behavior… There is such an organ — the collection of microbes in and on your body, your human microbiome.

Dr. Dominguez-Bello is known as the expert on both the effects of C-section births on a child’s development and on how breastfeeding affects the baby’s microbiome. It’s known to affect many physiological processes “ranging from adiposity/obesity, to energy metabolism, blood pressure control, glucose homeostasis, clotting risks or even behavior.” A 2019 paper by this researcher and three others, with 111 listed sources, is peppered with interesting statements like these:

Infants develop during the first 6 months under the selective pressure of milk shaping the gut microbial communities…

[E]vidence suggests that longer duration of breastfeeding is associated with decrease in risk of overweight.

Obesity risk has been epidemiologically associated with C-section birthing and early antibiotic exposure.

Our previous post discussed how C-section births are often associated with the decision not to breastfeed, so this all ties in together. Other studies indicate that breastfeeding for the first five months is “associated with an approximately 25 per cent lower likelihood of being overweight or obese in childhood.” This is only one reason why various experts have described breastmilk as irreplaceable, perfectly customized food, the gold standard, nature’s superfood, and the ultimate in personalized medicine.

While serving as executive director and chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Dr. Chris Urbina announced that the state is the foremost in breastfeeding, saying, “Breastfeeding is one of our best protections against childhood obesity.”

Researchers at Wake Forest Baptist indicated that “gut bacteria and its interactions with immune cells and metabolic organs, including fat tissue, play a key role in childhood obesity,” adding that…

[…] a series of studies over the past decade has confirmed that the microbes living in our gut are not only associated with obesity but also are one of the causes… In addition, having a better understanding of the role of the gut microbiome and obesity in both mothers and their children hopefully will help scientists design more successful preventive and therapeutic strategies to check the rise of obesity in children.

Adrain Corbett, the founder of GutGeek.com, wrote:

Baby’s new microbiome is topped up several times a day through breastfeeding… Again this prevents the wrong bacteria getting established and taking over.

Studies show that babies born via C-section start off with random bacteria from the hospital, rather than the special ones from Mum. “Swabbing” baby with microbes taken manually from Mum may help to counter this!

In 2020, Dr. Jorge Chavarro wrote,

The results of our study highlight the need to be even more vigilant about decreasing the overall rate of cesarean deliveries, especially in the absence of a clear obstetric or medical indication, as adverse health effects on the offspring could even manifest decades later.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Web interview: Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello,” undated
Source: “Role of the microbiome in human development,” BMJ.com, 2019
Source: “Large babies born to moms with gestational diabetes face nearly triple the risk of childhood obesity: study,” Folio.ca, 12/11/18
Source: “Colorado ranks No. 1 in breastfeeding,” LamarLedger.com 08/05/12
Source: “Gut bacteria is key factor in childhood obesity,” ScienceDaily.com, 10/30/19
Source: “Kickstart Your Kids’ Gut Health,” GutGeek.com, 07/05/21
Source: “Do C-Section Babies Become Heavier Adults?,” UCLAHealth.org, 04/14/20
Image by Maja/CC BY-ND 2.0

Everything You Know About Breastfeeding Is Wrong, Continued Again

Following the two previous posts, this one is about to go deeper into two sub-topics, the first being birth by surgery, and the second being the suspected reason why that seems to contribute to childhood obesity.

Overweight mothers are very likely to have large babies. The baby’s size is a strong determining factor in the medical decision to deliver by cesarean section. Also, C-section mothers are statistically less likely than vaginal birth mothers to breastfeed their babies, or if they do, they tend not to continue with it for as long. In addition, obese women, in general, are “less likely to start breastfeeding […] and less likely to breastfeed for at least 6 months,” according to the American Journal for Managed Care. These four related facts create a complicated and often self-perpetuating group of circumstances that conspire to add to the overall prevalence of childhood obesity.

Birth by surgery

For The Atlantic, economist Emily Oster and physician W. Spencer McClelland wrote,

Evidence and expert consensus are consistent on the message that C-sections, on average, come with greater risks than vaginal births: more blood loss, more chance of infection or blood clots, more complications in future pregnancies, a higher risk of death. Even if serious complications don’t occur, C-section recovery tends to be longer and harder.

[H]ospitals’ C-section rates vary from 7 percent to 70 percent. Differences in patient complexity cannot account for that spread.

Whatever challenges may be present with vaginal birth, a C-section intensifies them. In the U.S., almost one-third of births (over 30%) are surgical. Many people feel that this happens for the convenience of physicians, who would prefer not to come out in the middle of the night for deliveries. Yet despite life being made easier for them, the financial rewards are greater, so this is a very controversial subject. If C-sections were limited to medical necessity, the World Health Organization feels that the rate would be more like 10% or 15%.

For these post-op mothers, whether they are obese or normal weight, feeding the newborn becomes even more complicated, which is why such guides as “10 Tips for Breastfeeding After a C-Section” exist. Its author, nurse and lactation counselor Shantel Harlin, mentions that whether a C-section is planned or decided on after labor has already begun, the baby’s nutrition is affected. Apparently, women who deliver by predetermined C-section frequently have no intention to breastfeed anyway, or if they start, they only keep it up for about three months.

The role of the microbiome

All this increasingly points to a connection between breastfeeding and the trillions of tiny organisms that live inside us and evidently control large portions of our lives. It is strongly suspected that C-sections cause obesity in infants because these microbes are not given the chance to play their appointed role in preventing it.

The theory is not universally accepted, but the last post in this series will quote some of the many experts who have adopted this way of thinking. Childhood Obesity News has briefly touched on the subject before, citing…

[…] studies that have observed increased obesity rates in children delivered by caesarean section. During a vaginal delivery, the baby is supposed to pick up microbiota on the way out, collecting a starter kit of bugs as the basis for its own colony. When a child is surgically removed, the opportunity to acquire those valuable bacteria is denied. What if it’s true that C-section kids get fat because of an inadequate microbiome? A lot of assumptions would have to be questioned.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Understanding Why Women With Obesity Don’t Breastfeed,” AJMC.com, 01/12/19
Source: “Why the C-Section Rate Is So High,” TheAtlantic.com, 10/17/19
Source: “10 Tips for Breastfeeding After a C-Section,” KindredBravely.com, 08/11/20
Image by Marc van der Chijs/CC BY-ND 2.0

Everything You Know About Breastfeeding Is Wrong, Continued

This continuation makes more sense if the reader first checks out the previous post based on an article by Aubrey Hirsch that goes into exquisite detail about the actual expense involved in breastfeeding, which is believed to help prevent obesity. For instance, a breastfed baby will not overfeed, because when hunger is satisfied he will voluntarily unlatch, or fall asleep.

Even when it is feasible, no one should be lulled into the false idea that this is an economical choice. On the most mundane level, there is the cost of supplies and equipment — a breast pump, for occasions when the milk is ready but the baby is not, or the mom is away from home; and milk storage bags; and bottles for milk that has been expressed by hand or by a mechanical pump. And nursing bras, and nipple cream, among other amenities. Prenatal vitamins should be continued, and a mom who serves as a feeding station needs to fuel up with an extra three to four hundred calories per day.

Natural?

Contrary to popular belief, breastfeeding does not come naturally or easily to every woman. To help with that, there are classes, and in an extreme case, the services of a lactation consultant can be hired for $200 per hour.

Plutus Foundation has determined that breastfeeding, in the first year, runs about $950, which includes all the startup coats, so it works out to less in the second year. About six months is the average time for exclusive breastfeeding, before other nourishment is introduced. But in this country the average maternity leave, if indeed such an amenity is offered at all, seems to be about 10 weeks, or two and a half months. Formula, by the way, runs about $1,200 per year.

Even though the annual price tag for breastfeeding decreases, not many have the chance to appreciate this, because the indirect cost — for instance, of not having gainful employment — goes up and up and up, which ties into another concept that Hirsch mentions:

And breastfeeding is only “free” if you think lactating parents’ time is worthless…. [The] amount of time spent breastfeeding (or pumping) in a year is nearly equivalent to the hours worked in a full-time job.

Her calculations also take into account the toll on the mother’s body, and even though some of these negative consequences have been mentioned here already, let’s just list them all, the better to appreciate the full effect.

The breasts themselves can suffer plugged ducts, fungal infections, mastitis, engorgement, and cracked nipples, while the rest of the body is subject to inadequate sleep, back pain, cramping, osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome. Oh, and let’s not forget emotional health, including significant loss of time, and bodily autonomy, along with exhaustion, and being targeted by strangers with negative judgments.

Also, there is the pain of being misunderstood by friends and family members. When a well-meaning person says, “At least there is no cost,” how does a mom feel, knowing that person totally discounts the value of the work she put in and the toll on her mental and physical health?

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “The Many, Many Costs of Breastfeeding,” Vox.com, 05/17/22
Image by Sacha Chua/CC BY 2.0

Everything You Know About Breastfeeding Is Wrong

In recent weeks, it would have been difficult to avoid knowing that in many places, the baby formula shelves were empty. This is pertinent because Childhood Obesity News has published several posts on the topic of nature’s solution, breastfeeding, as it relates to obesity.

Many experts are of the opinion that feeding an infant the old-fashioned way helps prevent obesity, for various reasons. This current, heavily politicized supply chain problem nevertheless presents an opportunity to make several points that families will want to take into consideration when planning to breastfeed an expected baby as a stopgap against obesity.

For Vox.com, Aubrey Hirsch put together an amusingly illustrated guide to the ins and outs of the practice, subtitled “Breastfeeding isn’t free — and it isn’t a solution to the national baby formula shortage.” Her first important point is that the people who have the most to say are, as usual, the ones who do not know what they are talking about. Total novices hop onto social media platforms to scold parents for wanting to buy formula in the first place, because if they were good people — especially if they were good mothers — they would not dream of doing such a thing. As in so many cases, critics take a patronizing, superior attitude regarding a subject with which they have zero familiarity.

What’s stopping you?

There are cases where breastfeeding is literally impossible, maternal death being one that Hirsch did not darken our day by even mentioning. But never fear, there are plenty of other possibilities. The child may be immediately adopted or placed in foster care.

If the mom has had surgery to remove cancerous growths, that could be a problem. In some cases, a mother was born with a mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, and sacrifices her breasts to prevent cancer. And what about implants, elective cosmetic surgery that can, in a shockingly large percentage of cases, make breastfeeding dauntingly difficult, if not impossible?

One factor would be the type of surgery, and the amount of damage done to breast tissue and nerves. The glandular tissue might have been not quite up to the job of producing milk in the first place. The size of the implants can also affect the outcome, as can scar tissue, which is capable of causing complications like mastitis and blocked milk ducts. Among other things that can go wrong, the tissue around the implants may harden.

The baby might have medical problems, including allergies, or other urgent issues that must be dealt with, and rule out the possibility of breastfeeding. The mother could be on medications that should not be passed through to the baby. Or the unfortunate mom might simply have an inadequate milk supply to offer. And some might be unwilling or unable to embark on such a project, for other than strictly medical reasons.

Is that the end of the bad news? Not even close.

(To be continued…)

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “The Many, Many Costs of Breastfeeding,” vox.com, 05/17/22
Source: “Breastfeeding With Implants,” breastfeeding.support, 06/18/20
Image by SUN Movement/CC BY-ND 2.0

If It Isn’t Addiction, What Is It?

In the light of how much attention has been paid to addiction over the last few decades, the amount of mystery that still surrounds the subject is considerable. As a small example, take Dr. Vera Tarman’s words about weighing and measuring portions:

A food addiction treatment plan may also include ample amounts of food so that the person does not over/under eat. To this end, it may even be necessary to weigh and measure foods. This is not about calorie counting or food restriction, it is about keeping the food addict safe by controlling the amount and type of food choices.

But if you can put a leash on it, is it really an addiction? Or just a bad habit? And, is the problem in the substance, or the person? Prof. Bruce Alexander, of Rat Park fame, says research has confirmed that “the great majority of individuals in reasonably healthy social environments who use the so-called ‘addictive drugs’ do not become addicted.”

Is addiction forever?

Even long-term users, like surgical patients, Vietnam veterans, and others, have shown that the inescapable addiction trope is not accurate. So, if drugs with proven addictive potential don’t necessarily hook everybody who tries them, isn’t it overly dramatic and even silly to talk about being addicted to potato chips or cookies?

A phrase that lurks in many minds is, “Once a junkie always a junkie.” In other words, even if someone is not currently using, and has not used for years, they are still just as much an addict as the on the long-ago day when an ambulance picked them up from the gutter and took them to a hospital. Another way of expressing the notion is, “Never recovered, always recovering.” Even within Alcoholics Anonymous, the granddaddy of all programs, the controversy continues, as shown by a lengthy collection of opinions from AA members.

The BED conundrum

We have been talking about the concepts of food addiction (FA) and eating addiction (EA), and also about what a person’s own body and/or psyche might contribute to the likelihood that they will become addicted, obese, neither, or both. In “Is food addiction a valid and useful concept?,” H. Ziauddeen and P. C. Fletcher discussed “the possible validity of a FA model in the context of a subgroup of individuals in whom obesity is prevalent: specifically those who suffer from binge eating disorder (BED).” They wrote,

In BED, we have a phenotype that goes beyond obesity with a behavioral profile of disordered and compulsive eating, and this is critical to begin an evaluation of the underlying processes and neural circuitry.

The NeuroFAST research organization has made an interesting statement about obesity: that in most types of it, food addiction is “unlikely to be relevant.” While FA may exist, most weight accumulation results from “marginal overconsumption of calories over long periods of time,” a slow process that is unlikely to be noticed in the short term, somewhat like facial wrinkles. Instead, they see the FA concept as more likely to apply to regular and significant overeating “within the context of a clinical eating disorder resembling an addiction.”

According to the research brief,

Patients with drug addiction or eating disorders that mimic food addiction (such as BED) do share some character-traits, such as impulsivity. In particular, it will be important to establish how comparable the behavioral and neurobiological processes in chemical and food addiction really are, and whether similarities and differences can be exploited to benefit.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Guest Post: Food Abstinence for Food Addicts: Deprivation or a New Freedom?,” DrSharma.ca, February 2015
Source: “Addiction: The View from Rat Park,” BruceKAlexander.com, 2010
Source: “Recovered versus Recovering — What’s your position?,” BigBookSponsorship.org, undated
Source: “Is food addiction a valid and useful concept?,” NIH.gov, January 2013
Source: “The Biology Behind ‘Food Addiction,” Europa.eu, undated
Image by Fabio Venni/CC BY-SA 2.0

Happiness Quotient vs. Obesity, Continued

Some national populations have a fortunate genetic heritage that leaves their feel-good genes unfettered, making them happy countries, and we are looking at the inner workings of this phenomenon, with an eye to comparing the happiest with the least obese, to see how much overlap there might be.

To many researchers, it seems self-evident that life problems cause psychological distress, which in turn causes people to overeat and put on unhealthy and unwanted weight. So, people who have the A allele in their FAAH gene, allowing natural happiness, should logically be more likely to have a healthy weight. But that is proposed with many reservations.

Okay, a couple of caveats

Go ahead and take this with many grains of salt. For one thing, a country does not necessarily have a low average Body Mass Index because the people are weight-conscious self-actualizers who eat clean and work out regularly. It might be that they are poor and hungry, in a famine-stricken area.

Also, bureaucracies create hidden variables. Statistics go through many stages before being officially tabulated, and perhaps after. Some studies actually measure and weigh people, while others use self-reported data. In the USA alone, how many people have a driver’s license that reflects their actual weight, hmmm? Still, a comparison of numbers does give a general idea of how things tend to be.

And of course, many other circumstances enter the mix. Weather, natural disasters, war, political unrest during peacetime, prosperity or lack thereof, and on and on.

Who’s who?

Researchers quoted in the previous Childhood Obesity News post used numbers from 2012-2014 to determine that the 15 happiest countries during that period were (starting with the happiest):

Switzerland, Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, Israel, Costa Rica, Austria, Mexico, United States.

They should be the 15 least obese, right? Or at least a pretty close correlation?

The Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook, as archived by the Wayback Machine, used obesity statistics gathered in 2015 and 2016 (just after the time period as mentioned above). National populations are represented by the percentage of adults considered to be obese, and ranked from most obese to least obese. So in this scheme, the higher the ranking number, the less obese.

It is kind of a confusing mess, which only goes to show that plenty of additional factors, other than a low Body Mass Index, must figure into happiness.

Let’s also throw in a few countries mentioned by other researchers (World Values Surveys) as experiencing superlative happiness. Ghana has a low obesity rate, with only 10% of adults considered obese. In Nigeria, only 8% of adults are considered obese. In those cases, low obesity does line up with high happiness. But in Colombia, 22% of adults are obese. And they are just as happy as the people of Ghana and Nigeria, where less than half as many adults are obese.

Again, it seems obvious that plenty of other factors are in play, because while happiness sometimes matches up with low obesity, in other cases it does not.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “The happiest countries in the world, according to neuroscientists, statisticians, and economists,” BusinessInsider.com, 04/23/15
Source: “Country Comparison,” The World Factbook, archived
Source: “Genes may contribute to making some nations happier than others,” ScienceDaily.com, 01/14/16
Image by Taro the Shiba Inu/CC BY 2.0

Happiness Quotient vs. Obesity

Do certain genes exert influence over a person’s likelihood of developing an addiction to food and/or eating? It does seem likely.

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) will act to suppress the benefits of anandamide (also known as the “bliss molecule“) in the body. A variant of FAAH has a feature called the A allele, which helps prevent the chemical degradation of anandamide. Consequently, about one in five people are genetically predisposed to be naturally happy, because their anandamide is not thwarted by FAAH.

People in certain countries tend to be happy, and they tend to be people with that genetic makeup. Researchers consulted data from three World Values Surveys (2000-2014) and found that “nations with the highest prevalence of the A allele are quite clearly also those who perceive themselves happiest.”

They include:

[…] Ghana and Nigeria in West Africa, and northern Latin American nations, such as Mexico and Colombia… Northern Europeans such as Swedes were found to have a much higher prevalence of the A allele — and more often rate themselves as being very happy — than their cousins from Central or Southern Europe.

In a similar collection of statistics on happiness or subjective well-being, gathered for the World Happiness Report for 2012-2014 (the most recent end of the World Values Range) we find more details. According to their chart, the 15 happiest countries in that era were (starting with the happiest):

Switzerland, Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, Israel, Costa Rica, Austria, Mexico, United States.

It is generally accepted that a lot of overeating, and therefore obesity, results from emotionally unhappy states like depression, frustration, unrequited love, etc. The question at hand is, does the general happiness level of these special people in these countries, keep them slim? Does the presence of AEA in their systems, unhindered by the restrictive efforts of FAAH, reduce their anxiety and other negative emotions enough to prevent them from becoming obese?

If emotional conflict and societal stress lead to bad eating, does happiness mean better dietary habits and thus less obesity? What are the least obese countries, and do they match up with the happiest?

(To be continued…)

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Genes may contribute to making some nations happier than others,” ScienceDaily.com, 01’14/16
Source: “The happiest countries in the world, according to neuroscientists, statisticians, and economists,” BusinessInsider.com, 04/23/15
Image by Alan/CC BY 2.0

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources