Coronavirus Chronicles — The Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good

For The New York Times, Perri Klass, M.D., wrote about the current state of tension that exists around the new coronavirus and childhood obesity. As pediatrician Dr. Sandy Hassink says,

Obesity itself as a disease presents a risk for more severe Covid infection. If I substituted the word asthma for obesity, people would not be blaming people for having asthma, they would be saying, let’s make sure your environment doesn’t have allergens, let’s make sure you get the right meds, the right medical care, but not blaming the child.

Dr. Hassink, a childhood obesity expert, is affiliated with the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight. When it comes to weight issues, Dr. Michelle White, who teaches pediatrics at Duke University, emphasizes that family may be as important as either diet or exercise. She says,

Some families reporting significant impact by Covid-19 are still able to demonstrate resilience to stress and behaviors such as physical activity and healthy diet. I think we have a lot to learn from these families.

The opposite is also true. Dr. Mary Jo Messito, of the N.Y.U. School of Medicine and the venerable Bellevue Hospital, speaks of families who, because of the COVID-19 danger, can only dream of healthy exercise. In New York City, there is widespread food insecurity and stress by the ton. She describes patients as being unable to meet their goals because of unaddressed mental health needs, and frankly says, “My patients are suffering terribly.”

Dr. Elsie Taveras, pediatrician, and professor of nutrition aligned with two prestigious institutions, is adamant about the importance of realizing how much the pandemic increases the risks already inherent in obesity. She sees the need to call upon the resources of mental and behavioral health experts, and transcend “surface counseling”:

If a patient with obesity comes in for a visit and I also know the family is living in a motel or they’re food insecure, I need to adapt my plan to circumstances rather than say, “increase fruits and vegetables.”

Over at the Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, families tell Dr. Eliana Perrin and her colleagues what works, and they in turn pass suggestions along to other families. Always, getting enough sleep is recommended, along with as much physical activity as possible within limited circumstances.

For a lot of parents, at present, the whole “limit screen time” ambition is pretty much a losing battle. In many places, kids are expected to learn and do schoolwork remotely, which involves plenty of sitting in front of a screen. And in the winter, with everything closed and a pandemic raging outside, what else is there, realistically, for them to do but entertain themselves with games or movies?

A parent can try to broker a deal, like five minutes of walking briskly around the room in return for each hour of screen time. (Good luck with that.) Encouraging movement is important, and it seems as if doing a little bit every day is one key to providing an atmosphere of continuity and stability. Parents are asked to not blame themselves for less than a complete success.

They are encouraged to look for any opportunity to congratulate kids for good decisions and healthy behaviors and are reminded to always look after mind, body, heart, and spirit. Dr. Perrin says,

Forget what “needs” to get done for physical activity goals and “perfect” meal goals. As always, try to focus on behaviors, not weight.

“The perfect is the enemy of the good” means, among other things, that striving for impossible perfection can discourage parents into such a negative frame of mind that they quit trying altogether. Sometimes we need to accept “good” as the best we can do under the circumstances, and let good be good enough.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “There’s No Easy Fix for Children’s Weight Gain,” NYTimes.com, 01/25/21
Image by Pat Hartman

Coronavirus Chronicles — When Hope Is Sparse

A few years ago, childhood obesity was in the news a lot because of former First Lady Michelle Obama and the Let’s Move! campaign that inspired the nation to see that problem as something other than a joke. Now, because of the plague caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, it has become even more serious — and back then, the virus was “small potatoes” compared to now.

As this blog often points out, obesity and the virus team up and enable each other in many ways. Even in June, when the pandemic was just getting off the ground (relative to the high-flying threat that it would become), grownups were alarmed. Parents, teachers, and health professionals were upset about children losing their opportunities for physical exercise. They began to realize that the combined impact of COVID-19 and obesity is more than the sum of its parts.

Lilee Williams of Moms.com wrote then, “many of the factors that have gone in to self-quarantine and social distancing for the coronavirus have negative impacts on children.” Since then, it has only become worse. All over the world, people are observing various degrees of isolation as mandated by law or common sense. Of course, not everyone’s situation is the same, but by and large, parents are suffering from the demands of multitasking. They not only have to figure out how to keep paying the bills, but are obliged to become teachers of academic subjects. In addition, they are supposed to be Physical Education teachers with no experience, environmental support, or equipment.

U.B. studies Italy

The University of Buffalo studied the effects of last April and May on some overweight children in Italy and found that they were putting in, daily, a whopping five hours more of electronic screen time, than they had done in the same months of the previous year. Their physical activity had lessened by two hours a week, and they consumed the equivalent of an extra meal daily.

But you haven’t heard the worst part yet. These kids had already been enrolled in an anti-obesity treatment program! The only good aspect of that is, they were accustomed to filling out behavioral questionnaires, and everything about their 2019 habits had already been documented, as a basis for comparison.

After interviewing study co-author Professor Myles Faith, journalist Ryan Prior jotted down notes on role-modeling:

The most important way that families can push back together against less healthy lockdown habits is by creating a culture within the household centered on healthy living.

Don’t bring junk food home, say the experts, and don’t be afraid of experimenting with salad dressings until kids discover one they don’t mind finding carrots underneath. Prepare and eat family meals together. Try to limit the children’s sedentary screen lives to academic needs and vital social connections. Strive for the optimally healthy combination of routine and leniency. Praise children for doing well, or for at least trying.

And remember, they are watching and taking their cues from you. The most important advice for parents is to remember the words of Mahatma Gandhi and “Be the change you wish to see in the world.”

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “COVID-19 Lockdown Is Negatively Impacting Kids Struggling With Obesity,” Moms.com, 06/05/20
Source: “Sedentary lockdowns put kids at risk for obesity. Here’s how to help them stay moving,” CNN.com. 06/12/20
Image by Michael Coghlan/CC BY-SA 2.0

What the Hadza Have

Toward the end of 2017, Vox.com updated a comprehensive article titled, “Why you shouldn’t exercise to lose weight, explained with 60+ studies.” The problem is that for years, the public has been on the receiving end of this message: “As long as you get on that bike or treadmill, you can keep indulging — and still lose weight.” Is it a valid message? No. But as the old philosophers used to say, cui bono? Who benefits? Authors Julia Belluz and Javier Zarracina name several parties:

[…] fitness gurus, celebrities, food and beverage companies […] public health officials, doctors, and the first lady of the United States.

They also mention gyms, tracking device manufacturers, sports drinks peddlers, and the creators of workout videos as entities who benefit from the pervasive belief in an inaccurate concept. The lead author consulted more than 60 studies and interviewed nine researchers who specialize in nutrition, exercise, and obesity. The consensus was,

This message is not only wrong, it’s leading us astray in our fight against obesity.

In 2017, obesity researcher Kevin Hall published a study in the journal Obesity that followed up on 14 people who had lost weight via The Biggest Loser TV show. Following up on these contestants six years later, Hall found…

[T]he people who lost the most weight on the show weren’t necessarily the people who did the most exercise — instead, it was the people who ate the least.

As they continued on with their lives, however, some of the former contestants did manage to keep their weight down, and accomplished that by exercise — either 80 minutes daily of moderate exercise, or 35 minutes of more strenuous effort.

The Tanzanian mystery

Another scholar whose expertise was tapped was Herman Pontzer, an anthropologist who traveled to Tanzania to see what was going on with the Hadza, described as one of Earth’s few remaining hunter-gatherer tribes. It was a perfect fit, because, he said, “They’re on the high end of physical activity for any population that’s been looked at ever.”

On the other hand, it was a very small, preliminary study that included only 30 subjects. Still, the observations were enough to bring up an intriguing question. Namely, how were these extremely fit and constantly mobile people only burning as much energy as sedentary Westerners who spend their days staring at electronic screens? But there it was:

While the hunter-gatherers were physically active and lean, they actually burned the same amount of calories every day as the average American or European, even after the researchers controlled for body size.

But we have been raised to expect the exact opposite. Calorie burn supposedly is a function of lifestyle activity. Pontzer developed a couple of theories about this unexpected result:

[T]he Hadza were using the same amount of energy as Westerners because their bodies were conserving energy on other tasks. Or maybe the Hadza were resting more when they weren’t hunting and gathering to make up for all their physical labor, which would also lower their overall energy expenditure.

One thing was obvious — the Hadza culture did not encourage or reward overeating, which probably had a lot to do with their lack of any real need to burn off fat. For years, one researcher after another has reported that weight, once added to the body, is very difficult to banish with exercise. The absolute preferred method of maintaining a normal weight is to never gain extra weight in the first place.

The expression “hardwired” has been used, with the implication that some bodily processes are so deeply entrenched, to assume that we can “hack” them is very presumptuous. Whatever is going on with energy expenditure, and with the failure of previous energy balance theories to explain everything, it is very arrogant of us to think we can easily figure it out.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Why you shouldn’t exercise to lose weight, explained with 60+ studies,” Vox.com.10/31/17
Image by Christoph Borer/CC BY-ND 2.0

Exercise Tales

Aaron Gouveia had been heavy all his life and hated how he looked as an adult. Yet somehow, he had picked up the false impression that only parents of girls need to worry about eating disorders and body dysmorphia issues and suchlike. But his four-year-old child was a boy, Will. So, what could possibly go wrong?

As a professional writer, Gouveia appreciated the language, its uses and misuses, and even felt confident that he had a way with words. All he wanted was “to get healthy, go to the gym and live longer to enjoy life with my son.” What he got instead was a big surprise — himself doing something “stupid and potentially harmful.” It started with an ordinary, even banal conversation, transcribed here:

Me: “OK buddy, I’ve gotta go to the gym for a run.”
Will: “Dada, why do you run?”
Me: “Because I’m too fat. So I run so I can get skinny like you.”

When Gouveia returned home, Will was running around like crazy. Eventually, the little boy explained, “I’m getting fat, so I needed to run like you, Dada.” After this incident, the child’s parents noticed that he did not like to be around them with his shirt off. He would stand on the bathroom scale in imitation of his father, and seemed preoccupied with “unhealthy body issues and an obsession with weight.” Gouveia wrote,

I thought I was setting a positive example by showing him that it’s important to exercise and be fit. I never meant to scare him or make him feel bad about himself, but I also failed to realize that by talking about myself negatively, it affects him too. To the point a 4-year-old had to exercise to avoid feeling fat.

Shrouded in history

The prevalent idea is that “fight or flight” is the basic choice an animal makes when threatened. If we go along with that proposition, then strenuous exercise is a perfect combination of those two solutions. Exercise is a useful and effective displacement behavior. Take running, for instance, which is pure flight.

In the old days, running made people happy because it enabled them to escape from dangerous predators. Now, if we run, the body helps the brain endure stress because it sends the same chemical message: “We are outrunning the monster. We are leaving the threat behind and getting away. Every second, we are farther from danger and closer to safety.” Well, of course, runners get high!

When a person puts on boxing gloves and hits a bag, that exercise is pure fight, and as long as the person is conscious, the brain gets the message it loves to hear: “We are beating the stuffing out of this enemy right now.” Other forms of exercise comprise different combinations of fight and flight, with documented positive effects, including stress relief. A tennis player who powerfully returns a serve is a hero who chases a large marauding animal from the village, at least internally.

What could be more rewarding than overcoming or outrunning an enemy? Nothing! Consequently, many people love to exercise because they are in very close communication with their own reward systems, and recognize a good thing when they feel it.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “My 4 Year-Old Thinks He’s Fat,” Medium.com, 09/21/20
Image by woodleywonderworks/CC BY 2.0

March to a Different Drummer

We have already discussed Alaisdair Wilkins, who had lost 100 pounds in a year, and the team of writers who analyzed his success. As mentioned, the consensus was, “He found what worked for him.

In 2015, people were talking about a meta-study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The question was, “Which diet works best?” and the answer was, “None.” After examining the academically respectable breakdowns of 59 different dietary schemes, the meta-study authors said that “practicality reigned”:

There were no major differences between the diets, and success was completely dependent on what the individual could adhere to.

This confirms what Wilkins had also indicated: People need to find what works for them. We know that he basically lost the weight by walking an uphill treadmill for an hour a day. Writing for Vox.com, he elaborated:

I moved out of my parents’ house and away from their immaculately stocked refrigerator, and also meant the place where I worked all day was located more than a 10-foot walk from where I slept…

He also wrote,

Basically, after convincing myself that I was a failure — a belief in which I saw my weight as both cause and effect — I’ve removed the limitations that I once placed on myself, and it’s because I lost 100 pounds.

But then, having ruminated on various things in the sentences that preceded that one, he disparaged himself for having written them because…

[…] everything I’ve just written perpetuates our noxious, damaging cultural narrative on weight and obesity. Ours is a culture that simultaneously incentivizes people to gain weight and stigmatizes them when they do…

And why is that? Why, as previously mentioned, is “diet versus exercise” such an irritatingly persistent discussion? Because of emotional issues and, even more important, because of financial issues. Professionals in the fields of nutrition and physical fitness deserve to make a decent living, of course. But it is regrettably recognized by society at large that weight loss, whether via exercise, diet, or other means, is a major industry.

Where does Wilkins weigh in?

On the exercise-versus-diet question, he personally found it much easier to “hop on a treadmill” and watch a movie, than to reduce his food portions — at least in the beginning — although that changed. Wilkins ignored advice about the “best” way. He took the trouble to get to know himself, what he could tolerate, what he could live with, what he was able to commit to. He did it his way, not as an arbitrary choice made from blind contrariness, but because, when he had done the inner work, a way showed itself to him.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Exercise vs. Diet: Which Is More Important for Weight Loss,” LifeHacker.com, 01/05/15
Source: “I lost 100 pounds in a year. My ‘weight loss secret’ is really dumb,” Vox.com, 01/01/16
Image by Elvert Barnes/CC BY-SA 2.0

Diverse Opinions on Exercise

We are tracking the history of exercise advocacy through the past few years. In 2015, Indoor Extreme Sports (Long Island) was in the news. Kids could “be the game,” playing versions of laser tag or paintball that are strenuous and challenging, but with fewer consequences than previous entrepreneurs had offered. For instance, there is no messy actual paint to clean up. The picture on this page, by the way, is of a traditional indoor paintball facility.

Getting back to Indoor Extreme Sports, founder Ryan Chin told the press,

Simulating a gaming experience, Indoor Extreme Sports […] offers kids many options for active recreation… We have developed game play at our facility that mimics those of today’s most (video game) popular titles. We always try to develop adrenaline-pumping activities.

It sounds expensive, and of course, it is. All kinds of fancy costumes and equipment are involved, and special effects. The teams probably cost as much to deploy as a regular army. For customers, the financial experience is much closer to a day at a major theme park than a fast-food lunch.

Chin had worked two decades as a commodities trader, but changes in the industry phased him out. In other words, he was a businessman first, scouting for the next big thing. Did he find it?

Yes, because either he or others have started similar businesses in other locations, hosting children’s birthday blowouts and corporate events. No, because the pandemic came along. In either case, games of this genre are definitely not playable by a child at home. Although Chin’s company originally talked about “getting kids off the couch,” there is very little here for the average kid. We all need something we can do at or near home, every day.

Who needs the exercise?

Contemporaneously, The New York Times published a story with the straightforward title, “To Lose Weight, Eating Less Is Far More Important Than Exercising More.” Journalist Aaron E. Carroll mentioned these points:

A 2011 meta-analysis […] looked at the relationship between physical activity and fat mass in children, and found that being active is probably not the key determinant in whether a child is at an unhealthy weight.

From 2001 to 2009, the percentage of people who were sufficiently physically active increased. But so did the percentage of Americans who were obese. The former did not prevent the latter.

The debates about diet versus exercise, and about diet and/or exercise, in relation to obesity, might cease if only there were not so many financial issues and emotional issues involved on all sides.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Indoor Extreme Sports: Getting kids ‘off the couch’,” SILive.com, 04/23/15
Source: “To Lose Weight, Eating Less Is Far More Important Than Exercising More,” NYTimes.com, 06/15/15
Image by Markus Tacker/CC BY-ND 2.0

Genetics, Environment, Inclination, and Destiny

Astonishing as this might seem, the debate about exercise has been going on for decades. After all the years and all the studies, and all the documented personal experience, one might think that by now, consensus would have been reached on the usefulness of exercise as a weight-loss tool. But no. Some people are firmly convinced that exercise is the only savior; others believe it makes no difference, and a very large number is still thoroughly confused.

Once in a while, fate provides the perfect opportunity for research. Thanks to life’s well-known randomness and weirdness, looking at nature’s matched sets enables scholars to make interesting conclusions of various kinds.

Curious Scandinavians

For years, Finland has been collecting statistics from identical twins and compiling them in the FinnTwin16 database. When the volunteers are 16 years old, they sign up to answer a batch of questions, then periodically fill out the questionnaires again every few years.

Heredity has a lot to do with how people’s bodies respond to exercise, and the amount of endurance capacity they have, as well as how much they enjoy sweating. Some people have never in their life experienced a “runner’s high” and have no desire to.

Scientists wanted to zero in on genetically identical pairs of males in their twenties, who had grown up with similar patterns of physical exertion. For the purpose of this study, each pair needed one twin who had exercised regularly in adulthood, and one who, hampered by work or family obligations, had not done so. These were surprisingly difficult to find. Set after set of male twins, even though living apart, adhered to remarkably similar exercise patterns.

In this case, the diet was not a major concern, which is just as well, because even among the relatively few pairs who exercised differently, food choices did not vary enough to be significant. Eventually, the scholars settled on 10 sets of twin brothers, whose exercise habits had diverged mostly within the past three years. Journalist Gretchen Reynolds explained,

The scientists invited these twins into the lab and measured each young man’s endurance capacity, body composition and insulin sensitivity, to determine their fitness and metabolic health. The scientists also scanned each twin’s brain.

The sedentary twins had lower endurance capacities, higher body fat percentages, and signs of insulin resistance, signaling the onset of metabolic problems.

The twins’ brains also were unalike. The active twins had significantly more grey matter than the sedentary twins, especially in areas of the brain involved in motor control and coordination.

At the University of Jyvaskyla, research team leader Dr. Urho Kujala noticed a common thread in each pair of twins, no matter what their genes dictated, and regardless of what their early training and habituation had entailed. In the realm of individual behavior, none of the influences is guaranteed to “take.” Apparently, it is not carved in stone that either heredity or environment can rule uncontested. Genetics and environment can both foster tendencies, but neither factor inevitably signals destiny.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “One Twin Exercises, the Other Doesn’t,” NYTimes.com, 03/04/15
Image by Lily Ballard/CC BY 2.0

Bikes and the Built Environment

In 2015, hard looks were being taken at the realities of everyday life, with the intention of inducing more motion in children — preferably in ways that fit in with customary life. In many locales, transportation to and from school became a hot topic.

In Mother Earth News, F. Kaid Benfield noted that…

As recently as 1973, some 60 percent of school-age children walked or biked to school. I’m told that, today, the portion is about 13 percent. All this while we have a serious problem with childhood obesity, which has more than doubled in children and tripled in adolescents in the past 30 years, according to the National Centers for Disease Control.

A case in idyllic Saratoga Springs, NY, drew media attention. A 12-year-old boy rode his bike to school,

a) along a dedicated bike trail
b) accompanied by his mother on her bike
c) on National Bike to Work Day.

On arrival, they were greeted by the security detail and the school administrators and told in no uncertain terms that students were not allowed to ride bikes to and from school.

The journalist asked questions, and the plot thickened. This particular family was fortunate to live adjacent to a designated bike trail, but students lived all over the district, so it definitely would not be safe for them to bike to school even if they were willing to. If a student was hurt, the school might face legal liability. Everyone must be subject to the same rules, so, therefore, the only acceptable modes of transport were parental car and school bus.

Benfield added,

The problem is the school’s location, completely isolated from its community instead of placed within the community where walking and bicycling would be a much more convenient and common choice.

There are a lot of cities in the United States, and far too many of them suffer from schools being built in the wrong locales. On top of a toxic waste pit is not the only bad place for a school. Maybe schools should be where students can get to them under their own steam. Certain factions want to see this taken more extensively into consideration before future plans are made.

Insisting on car or bus transport is based on safety of course, but Benfield adds that in any given year, about a quarter of a million children were hurt in motor vehicle accidents, and for kids from two to 14 years of age, the leading cause of death was MVAs,

Just in case any reader is in a position to influence such matters, the writer also goes into a great amount of detail about the 11 things to keep in mind when a new school is being planned.

Another culture

In the same time frame, Odense, Denmark’s third-largest city, was the exact opposite. Cars were forbidden in school zones, and the very large majority of children walked or rode skateboards back and forth. Even five-year-olds rode their bikes. By the time they reached Grade 3 or 4, class groups would go on field trips by bike. Odense had well over 300 miles of bike paths, an incalculable benefit for the residents and also a tourist attraction.

The school principal gave journalist Matt McFarland answers that might surprise some. Lars Christian Eriksen said that biking affects the child’s character, and seemed more impressed by brain stimulation than by the difference this vigorous exercise made on the muscles and bones.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Getting to School Shouldn’t Be So Hard,” Mother Earth News, February 2015
Source: “This Danish City Is So Bike-Friendly Even Kindergartners Ride To School,” NDTV.com, 02/24/16
Image by DieselDemon/CC BY 2.0

Exercise and Its Weight-Loss Reputation

Over the last decade, there has been a lot of debate about the efficacy of exercise to achieve weight loss. Take 2014, for instance. Many different voices chimed in on the importance of exercise, and what should be done about making it more available to the young. (This was, needless to say, during the Obama administration, when the First Lady adopted childhood obesity as her issue.)

In mid-year, this optimistic announcement was made (courtesy of journalist Claire Moser):

Mayors from across the country unanimously passed a resolution this week supporting new public parks and outdoor recreation programs to promote healthy urban areas and combat childhood obesity. The bipartisan resolution adopted at the annual meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

Possibly some industrious reporter has followed up on how that turned out.

In Denmark, Dr. Jens Christian Holm conveyed his method to almost two thousand patients, which enabled 70% of them to maintain a normal weight. All they had to do was change their lifestyles and habits in 20 different ways — and not small ways. How did exercise fit into this? Christopher Lane wrote,

[T]he program urges a dramatic reassessment (including by family members) of what children are eating and how much physical exercise they actually are getting.

Dr. Holm charmingly refers to “activities and inactivities.” In the realm of family obesity prevention therapy, motivation has always been a problem, but the method advocated by Dr. Holm reportedly works, and is a program that “families have really embraced.” These sentences from the cached version of his webpage explain:

We know that the fat mass is defended by an ingenious hormonal regulatory system, and that the fat tissue defense can vary from person to person. This means that some people will lose weight easier and faster than others…

For some, the body can be relentlessly proficient in maintaining the fat mass, but remember, there are no alternatives or magical tricks.

A Forbes.com interview yields another worthy Dr. Holm quotation:

First you need to understand obesity as a chronic disease like asthma, diabetes, epilepsy. And then you know to make chronic treatment. Then you need to understand that weight loss is not the most important thing. The most important thing is weight maintenance.

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “Want To Tackle The Childhood Obesity Epidemic? Then We Need To Build More Parks,” ThinkProgress.org, 06/25/14
Source: “Tackling Childhood Obesity: What Works, What Doesn’t,” PsychologyToday.com 11/10/14
Source: “Has A Doctor From Denmark Solved Childhood Obesity?,” Forbes.com, 04/13/15
Image by Juliane Schultz/CC BY-SA 2.0

Coronavirus Chronicles — The Troubled History of “Move More”

In the previous post, we looked at two different situations where advisors in positions of trust could be accused of peddling false hope to the public.

Case #1: Many authorities still believe that exercise is not, in every instance, connected with weight loss, and hold other beliefs that seem contrary to both common sense and actual experience. Yet the pro-exercise faction grows daily. A lot of people exercise and never lose weight. Is it immoral and unethical to advise people to exercise, when its usefulness cannot be guaranteed?

Case #2: A popular TV personality was publicly scolded for recommending a plant extract as a weight-loss miracle cure that would work for all body types — truly a prototypical “silver bullet.” Although the doctor apparently did not directly profit from the sales, there were still grounds for criticism. People were buying the product in good faith, a.k.a. false hope.

Is one more wrong than the other? It could be argued that even if people do not lose weight from exercise, it is good for the body and brain in several ways. In other words, barring accidents, exercise can’t hurt.

But what if the plant extract doesn’t hurt, either? What if it becomes recognized as a vital health-enhancing supplement for some previously unrecognized reason? Is that enough justification to keep it on the market, as long as the manufacturer promises not to promote it as a weight-loss answer? How could the merchant be sure of the buyer’s motive? Would customers need to sign a waiver, stating that they did not believe the product to be a weight-loss product, and would not use it as such?

The changing lens of history

Close as conjoined twins, obesity and COVID-19 are always meddling in each other’s business and doing each other favors. Obese people are more likely to get the virus, and anyone who has a bad case or a long-lasting case of the virus becomes so debilitated, they can’t bring themselves to exercise, or find the strength to get their hands on fresh produce, or to prepare a healthful salad. In many cases, they literally cannot do anything useful or approaching the requirements for a normal life. If they have been convinced that neither fresh vegetables nor exercise will help, the situation worsens. What should people believe about exercise?

While the New York Post has never been accused of superior journalism, it does get into an awful lot of people’s heads, so maybe attention should be paid to what it has been saying. In mid-2014, that was a piece by Susannah Cahalan titled “America rejoice! Being fat may actually make you healthier.” It was a review of a “science-based anti-diet book” authored by cardiologist Carl J. Lavie. Such a book might be called, by some, another item that gives people false hope — for example, they might erroneously conclude that it is better to be overweight.

Dr. Lavie’s book is called The Obesity Paradox. He acknowledges that obesity is a risk factor of epidemic proportions, but cites evidence that with some disease processes, extra fat can be an advantage, depending on which part of the body it resides in, and how much time a person spends getting less than minimal exercise.

In other words, sedentary life is a short life. He makes a very convincing case against sitting, which is right up there with smoking and opiate addiction (and COVID-19) as a ruthless killer. Cahalan explained the doctor, and then quoted him:

[I]n general, when body fat increases, often so do muscle mass and strength, necessary in battling chronic disease. This leads to the essential divide between being “fat and being fat and fit.” He cites two studies, one out of Canada and one conducted by the American Cancer Society, which both say unequivocally that the more you sit, no matter your age or weight, the sooner you’ll die.

“If you have to choose between being fat or fit, go for fit, even if it means being heavier.”

Your responses and feedback are welcome!

Source: “America rejoice! Being fat may actually make you healthier,” NYPost.com, 04/05/14″
Image by Jonas Bengtsson/CC BY 2.0

FAQs and Media Requests: Click here…

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Weight

Profiles: Kids Struggling with Obesity top bottom

The Book

OVERWEIGHT: What Kids Say explores the obesity problem from the often-overlooked perspective of children struggling with being overweight.

About Dr. Robert A. Pretlow

Dr. Robert A. Pretlow is a pediatrician and childhood obesity specialist. He has been researching and spreading awareness on the childhood obesity epidemic in the US for more than a decade.
You can contact Dr. Pretlow at:

Presentations

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the American Society of Animal Science 2020 Conference
What’s Causing Obesity in Companion Animals and What Can We Do About It

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the World Obesity Federation 2019 Conference:
Food/Eating Addiction and the Displacement Mechanism

Dr. Pretlow’s Multi-Center Clinical Trial Kick-off Speech 2018:
Obesity: Tackling the Root Cause

Dr. Pretlow’s 2017 Workshop on
Treatment of Obesity Using the Addiction Model

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation for
TEC and UNC 2016

Dr. Pretlow’s invited presentation at the 2015 Obesity Summit in London, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s invited keynote at the 2014 European Childhood Obesity Group Congress in Salzburg, Austria.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2013 European Congress on Obesity in Liverpool, UK.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2011 International Conference on Childhood Obesity in Lisbon, Portugal.

Dr. Pretlow’s presentation at the 2010 Uniting Against Childhood Obesity Conference in Houston, TX.

Food & Health Resources